Study on the NIMBY in Scientific Data Sharing

  • Zhou Shanshan ,
  • Weng Suxiang ,
  • Bi Qiang ,
  • Xu Kun
Expand
  • 1. School of Public Health, Jilin Medical University, Jilin 132013;
    2. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022

Received date: 2015-08-06

  Revised date: 2015-08-17

  Online published: 2015-09-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]To understand the data sharing attitude and willingness of researchers, explore the reasons of data sharing, find an effective method to promote data sharing in a wider range and multiplexed, and maximize its value. [Method/process]Usedliterature analysis, interviews and other research methods to build scientific data sharing factors.Used intervention research staff training methods to intervene the researchers and compared before and after the intervention of scientific data sharing attitude,to identify effective methods ofscientific data sharing promotion and provide how to enhance the researchers’ willingness of scientific data sharing.[Result/conclusion]Through the survey wefound thatthe NIMBY phenomenon existsin scientific research personnel data sharing wishes. Considering the NIMBY phenomenonsolutions in environment facilities to conduct interventions to researchers, after comparing before and after the intervention data, we found that thescientific data shared awareness risk is reduced, and theshared willingness is improved.The NIMBY facilities solutions have important reference value in scientific data sharing.

Cite this article

Zhou Shanshan , Weng Suxiang , Bi Qiang , Xu Kun . Study on the NIMBY in Scientific Data Sharing[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(17) : 84 -88 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.17.013

References

[1] 傅天珍,郑江平. 国外面向科研人员的科学数据共享探析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2015(2):76-81.
[2] Das T K, Teng Bingsheng. The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2004, 19 (1):85-116.
[3] Yakovleva M, Reilly R R, Werko R.Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95 (1):79-91.
[4] 李小敏,胡象明. 邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J]. 中国行政管理,2015(3):131-135.
[5] 姚德超,刘筱红. 邻避现象及其治理[J]. 城市问题,2014(4):2-8.
[6] 张向和,彭绪亚,彭莉. 基于人性公平视角的垃圾处理场邻避现象及其机制设计研究[J]. 求实,2011(S1):173-174.
[7] Mulligan A. The effect of the Internet on researcher motivations behavior and attitudes [J]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011, 67(2):290-311.
[8] Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions [J]. PLoS ONE. 2011(6):1-21.
[9] 张静蓓,吕俊生,田野. 国外数据共享行为影响因素研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(4):136-142.
[10] 何琳,常颖聪. 科研人员数据共享意愿研究[J]. 图书与情报,2014(5):125-131.
[11] 张晋朝. 我国高校科研人员科学数据共享意愿研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013(10):25-30.
[12] Piwowar H A. Who shares who doesn’t factors associated with openly archiving raw research data[J]. PLoS ONE,2011,(7):25-33.
[13] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等. 社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(1):74-79.
[14] 项英,赖剑菲,丁宁. 高校图书馆科学数据管理服务实践探索——以武汉大学社会科学数据管理为例[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013(12):89-93.

Outlines

/