Analysis on Design Factors of Online Class with Internet Thinking:Taking the Course "Data Analysis" for Example

  • Liu Lu ,
  • Yuan Xilin ,
  • Liu Li
Expand
  • 1. Institution of Information Science & Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096;
    2. Southeast University Library, Nanjing 210096

Received date: 2015-08-21

  Revised date: 2015-09-17

  Online published: 2015-10-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper intends to investigate how to fit online class teaching and course design methods of "Netsters'" self-inquiry learning mode.[Method/process] Two types of representative online classes, TED-Ed and Chinese university video open classes, have been selected and compared, with "data analysis" course for example.[Result/conclusion] It has been discovered that internet thinking has had a deep influence on online classes in the investigation. Online class design should focus on students' needs and take students' study as the main part, revolve around knowledge units and subjects, and organize educational resources in the flat form, to create interactive online education environment and improve the teaching effective of online class.

Cite this article

Liu Lu , Yuan Xilin , Liu Li . Analysis on Design Factors of Online Class with Internet Thinking:Taking the Course "Data Analysis" for Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(19) : 55 -61 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.007

References

[1] 构建利用信息化手段扩大优质教育资源覆盖面有效机制的实施方案[EB/OL].[2015-08-02].http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3342/201412/179124.html.
[2] 沈敏."在线"教育改变大学[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://jjckb.xinhuanet.com/2013-07/26/content_457832.htm.
[3] Penn GSE study shows MOOCs have relatively few active users,with only a few persisting to course end[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pressroom/press-releases/2013/12/penn-gse-study-shows-moocs-have-relatively-few-active-users-only-few-persisti.
[4] Allen I E,Seaman J.Changing course:Ten years of tracking online education in the United States[EB/OL].[2015-08-02].http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.
[5] Leep online learning[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://www.lis.illinois.edu/future-students/leep.
[6] Driscoll A,Thompson G.Can online courses deliver in-class results?:A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course[J].Teaching Sociology,2012,40(4):312-331.
[7] Yang Yan,Cho Y J,Mathew S,et al.College student effort expenditure in online versus face-to-face courses the role of gender,team learning orientation,and sense of classroom community[J].Journal of Advanced Academics,2011,22(4):619-638.
[8] Knott J L.Online teaching and faculty learning:The role of hypermedia in online course design[D].East Lansing:Michigan State University,2015.
[9] 邹自德,李文斐,王学珍.开放教育"在校课堂"与"在线课堂"的实践探索[J].中国远程教育,2014(23):55-59.
[10] 孙大雷.在线课程设计评价体系探究[J].价值工程,2013(3):211-212.
[11] 赵大伟.互联网思维之"独孤九剑"[J].科学之友(上半月),2014(5):13-15.
[12] 泰普斯科特.数字化成长3.0[M].云帆,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:69-72.
[13] Peet L.Pew:Millennials and libraries report examines millennial engagement,reading[J].Library Journal,2014,139(17):19-20.
[14] visualizing-data[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://ed.ted.com/series/visualizing-data.
[15] 开启智慧的大数据[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://open.163.com/special/cuvocw/kaiqizhihuidedashuju.html.
[16] 顾明远.教育大辞典[M].增订合编本上.上海:上海教育出版社,1998:1697.
[17] TED-Ed Tour[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://ed.ted.com/tour.
[18] 王妍,马弋飞.网络社区传播:美国TED品牌推广策略的启示[J].记者摇篮,2012(4):73-74.

Outlines

/

〈 〉