Library and Information Service >
Research on Authorship Contribution for the Singular Scientific Research Achievement in Multiple Scenarios
Received date: 2015-08-15
Revised date: 2015-09-19
Online published: 2015-10-05
[Purpose/significance] A practical and systematic guideline about authorship contribution in research groups is designed in order to solve the increasing problem about distributing the authorship credit for each member in a research team. [Method/process] This paper firstly defined the precondition and connotation of authorship contribution for singular scientific research achievement and concluded four authorship scenarios:equal authorship, sequence authorship, dumbbell authorship and proportional authorship. Secondly, the six-step fundamental standard and supplementary specifications were made based on the comparative analysis among well-known foreign standards. Finally, the integrated procedure of calculating authorship contribution was concluded including the corresponding procedure and formula mode in each one of those four scenarios.[Result/conclusion] This guideline integrates the early stage of the authorship standard when submitting research papers into the later stage of the authorship contribution after publishing research papers. This way provides a useful reference for distributing authorship credits of the singular scientific research achievement in a research group when considering both the quantitative method and the negotiation among members in a research team.
Xu Chen . Research on Authorship Contribution for the Singular Scientific Research Achievement in Multiple Scenarios[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(19) : 93 -99 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.012
[1] Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 5827(316):1036-1039.
[2] Greence M.The demise of the lone author[J].Nature,2007,7173(450):1165.
[3] Ossenblok T L B,Verleysen F T, Engels T C E.Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities(2000-2010)[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(5):882-897.
[4] Huang Muhsuan,Wu Lingling, Wu Yichen. A study of research collaboration in the pre-web and post-web stages:A coauthorship analysis of the information systems discipline[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015,66(4):778-797.
[5] 刘新梅,李玉曼.科研合作制度的进化解释——一个基于利益分配的合作进化模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001(4):96-99.
[6] Afifi M M. Authorship. credit and disputes[J].Saudi Medical Journal, 2004, 25(11):1742-1743.
[7] Hoen W P, Walvoort H C, Overbeke A J. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names?[J].The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998, 280(3):217-218.
[8] Teixeira da Silva J A. The ethics of collaborative authorship[J].EMBO Reports, 2011, 12(9):889-893.
[9] 陈希宁,冯远景. 科技期刊合著论文作者署名及排序[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2001,13(5):405-407.
[10] 杨雪,余磊,王开云.科技论文不同署名作者的贡献及责任[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2011,33(6):113-116.
[11] 张峻. 关于共同第一作者与作者贡献的署名问题[J].编辑学报,2010,22(5):397-399.
[12] 刘祥荣. 对科研成果报奖和科研论文作者名次排序问题的探讨[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,1994,7(3):43-45.
[13] Ivaniš A, Hren D, Sambunjak D, et al. Quantification of authors' contributions and eligibility for authorship:Randomized study in a general medical journal?[J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2008,23(9):1303-1310.
[14] Hagen N T. Harmonic publication and citation counting:Sharing authorship credit equitably——not equally, geometrically or arithmetically[J]. Scientometrics,2010,84(3):785-793.
[15] Tol R S J. Credit where credit's due:Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts[J]. Scientometrics,2010, 89(1):291-299.
[16] Tscharntke T, Hochberg M E, Rand T A, et al.Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. PLOS Biology,2007,5(1):13-14.
[17] Xu Jian, Ding Ying, Song Ming, et al. Author credit-assignment schemas:A comparison and analysis[J/OL].[2015-01-20].http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23495/epdf.
[18] Kim J. Rethinking the comparison of coauthorship credit allocation schemes[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015,9(3):667-673.
[19] Kim J, Diesner J. Coauthorship networks:A directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors[J/OL].[2015-01-20].http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00361.
[20] Xu Jian,Ding Ying,Malic V. Author credit for transdisciplinary collaboration[J]. PLOS ONE,2015,10(9).
[21] Kosmulski M. The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2012, 6(4):639-644.
[22] 吕海洋. 合著网络中作者的合作模式分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009:37-60.
[23] 邱均平,温芳芳. 作者合作程度与科研产出的相关性分析——基于"图书情报档案学"高产作者的计量分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(5):1-5.
[24] 杜建,张玢.作者合作视角下的h 指数计量方法:比较与归纳[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011,55(24):52-55.
[25] 朱丽娟,于建荣. 基于作者贡献的合著网络加权模式研究[J].图书馆杂志, 2011, 30(5):16-20.
[26] Davidoff F. Who's the author? Problems with biomedical authorship, and some possible solutions[EB/OL].[2015-01-20].http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/files/public/v23n4p111-119.pdf. 2014-1-18.
[27] Akhabue E, Lautenbach E."Equal" contributions and credit:An emerging trend in the characterization of authorship[J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2010, 20(11):868-871.
[28] 吴祝华,葛华忠,周贤军,等.我国并列第一作者发文情况调查与分析[J].编辑学报,2009,21(6):1.
[29] Verhagen J V, Wallace K J, Collins S C, et al.QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors[J]. Nature, 426(11):602.
[30] Price D D S. Multiple authorship[J]. Science,1981, 212(4498):986.
[31] Abbas A M. Polynomial weights or generalized geometric weights:Yet another scheme for assigning credits to multiple authors[EB/OL].[2015-01-20].http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2848.2011-3-15.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
