Library and Information Service >
The Study of H-index Scholars' Role in Scientific Community:Take Chinese Library and Information Science for Example
Received date: 2015-10-15
Revised date: 2015-11-23
Online published: 2015-12-05
[Purpose/significance] In order to study authoritative scholars' status and roles in scientific community, this paper takes co-author network structure analysis as a viewpoint, combines network analysis with high h-index scholars' roles, explores the influence of scholars in the location from the author nodes of the network structure, and provides a new way to study scientific community. [Method/process] Taking Chinese library and information science for example, this paper selects 33 high h-index scholars as the research objects and builds a co-author network, and then the nodes centricity, aggregation and hole-structure characteristics are analyzed using network analysis technology. [Result/conclusion] The analysis of the data indicates that most of the high h-index scholars have a core position in the network and closely tie together; those scholars play important roles in scientific community, such as leading the discipline development direction, establishing and maintaining discipline standard, strengthening the scientific communication and knowledge transmission, and the cultivation of the talent.
Key words： scientific community; h-index; co-author network; role
Yuan Siben , Zhu Yunxia . The Study of H-index Scholars' Role in Scientific Community:Take Chinese Library and Information Science for Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(23) : 72 -79 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.23.011
[1] 龚耘.从思维的视角看库恩的范式[J].科学技术与辩证法,1996(4):27-30.
[2] 吴海江.文化视野中的科学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2008:73-103.
[3] 沈铭贤.科学共同体及其规范[J].科学,2013,65(2):29-32.
[4] 朱惠,邓三鸿,杨建林.我国图书情报学领域博士生导师H指数分析[J].图书与情报,2013(5):57-66.
[5] 李醒民.科学共同体的功能[N].光明日报,2010-11-23(11).
[6] 莫少群."科学家的社会责任"问题的由来与发展[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,19(6):50-53.
[7] 陈萍.当代科学共同体的社会责任研究——一种风险社会的分析视角[D].福州:福州大学,2011:14-31.
[8] 梁飞.科学共同体概念、运行及其社会责任初探[J].法制与社会,2010(12):163-164.
[9] 李黎,孙文彬,汤书昆.科学共同体在科普产业发展过程中的角色与作用[J].科普研究,2013(8):17-26.
[10] 李科.中西科学家社会责任之比较——兼论我国科技伦理的特点[J].科学学研究,2010,28(11):1606-1610.
[11] 丁楠,周英博,叶鹰.h指数和h型指数研究进展[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):72-77.
[12] 金碧辉, Ronald R. R指数、AR指数:h指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8.
[13] 宋振世,周健,吴士蓉.h指数科研评价实践中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(1):117-135.
[14] 张学梅.用h指数对我国图书情报学界作者进行评价[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(8):48-50,79.
[15] 许新军.h指数在人才评价中的应用——以经济学领域高被引学者为例[J].情报杂志,2008(10):22-24,30.
[16] 谢彩霞.国际科学合作研究状况综述[J].科研管理,2008,29(3):179-186.
[17] 库恩.科学革命的结构(第四版)[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:149.
[18] 伊斯利,克莱因伯格. 网络、群体与市场——揭示高度互联世界的行为原理与效应机制[M].李晓明,王卫红,杨韫利,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2011:32-42.
[19] 伯特.结构洞:竞争的社会结构[M].任敏,李璐,林虹,译.上海:格致出版社,2008:18-31.
[20] 尚智从.科学社会学——方法与理论基础[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:167-195.
[21] 孙定建.论科学权威的作用[J].江西社会科学,2002(4):61-63.
[22] 米哈依洛夫.科学交流与情报学[M].徐新民,译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1983:47-71.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
