Library and Information Service >
Benchmarking Research and Application Within Information Literacy Education: A Case Study in Nantong University Library
Received date: 2015-10-19
Revised date: 2015-11-24
Online published: 2015-12-20
[Purpose/significance] The article reviewed benchmarking research and application of both domestic and oversea libraries to apply benchmarking to improve KPI of information literacy education in libraries.[Method/process] Six main indexes including 22 sub-indexes are created to collect benchmarking data of Tsinghua University Library, Shanghai Jiaotong University Library and Wuhan University Library. The article set up benchmarking scheme and work plan by analyzing the gap between benchmarking libraries and Nantong University Library including instruments for freshmen, library courses, resources and service lectures, online training, special projects, etc.[Result/conclusion] Benchmarking system supports setting clear learning target and complete indexes and collecting accurate data to make and process learning plan easily. Finally, the article summarized keynotes, advantages, disadvantages and limitation of benchmarking and foresee the further research.
Key words： benchmarking; library; information literacy
Huang Danyu . Benchmarking Research and Application Within Information Literacy Education: A Case Study in Nantong University Library[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(24) : 65 -71 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.24.010
[1] 欧明臣,凌文辁. 标杆分析法在图书馆绩效评估上的应用[J].情报资料工作,2003(6):47-49.
[2] 哈里顿.标杆管理——瞄准并超越一流企业[M].欧阳袖,张海蓉,译.北京:中信出版社,2003
[3] Henczel S. Benchmarking-measuring and comparing for continuous improvement[J].Information Outlook, 2002,6(7):12-20.
[4] White L S. The University of Virginia Library's experiment with benchmarking[J].Va Libraries, 2002, 48(4):17-25.
[5] Tripathi M. A report on the 30th Annual Conference of the International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries (IATUL) [J].Program, 2010, 44 (2): 158-165.
[6] 罗军. 当代图书馆管理中的市场化工具[J].中国图书馆学报,2009(3):85-95.
[7] Voorbij H, Academic library benchmarking in The Netherlands: A comparative study[J].Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2009,10(1):59-72.
[8] Wimmer U, What do higher education management and administration expect of library benchmarking?[J].Performance Measurement and Metrics,2009,10(2):116-121.
[9] 陶翔,金晓明,芮琦. 国际大都市图书馆评估研究[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(5):10-13.
[10] 王彩杰,叶素萍,廉立军. 定标比超分析法在高校图书馆中的应用研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2008(5):65-66,101.
[11] 叶素萍,廉立军. 定标比超法在高校图书馆信息资源优化中的应用研究[J].情报杂志,2008(4):29-30.
[12] 龚德昱,邱晓琳. 定标比超:图书馆管理的有效工具——对弗吉尼亚大学图书馆的案例研究[J].图书馆建设,2008(9):75-78.
[13] 蔡屏. 对高校图书馆实施标杆管理的思考——对昆士兰科技大学图书馆案例研究[J].图书馆建设,2010(11):85-89.
[14] 谢新洲,吴淑燕. 竞争情报分析方法——定标比超[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(2):137-151.
[15] 沈固朝.竞争情报的理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
