Library and Information Service >
Comparison of the Domestic and Overseas Legal Norms of Personal Data Collection and Transmission by Network Operators
Received date: 2015-12-21
Revised date: 2016-02-07
Online published: 2016-02-20
[Purpose/significance] This paper contrasts and analyzes the domestic and overseas legal norms of network operators collecting and transmitting personal data behavior. It aims to find out the specific problems in China's legal norms and make some suggestions by drawing lessons from the advanced legal norms for solving the increasingly fierce issues of network operators collecting and transmitting personal data behavior in China. [Method/process] Using the comparative approach,we sort out and compare the commons and differences among international organizations and current national legal norms from the aspects of legislation principles,legal obligations,accountabilities and special users(children users). [Result/conclusion] Through the comparative analysis above, it points out that China's currentrelative legal norms have main issues. Legal norms are too general, and it is difficult to protect the legal rights and legal norms lackthe specialized regulatory agencies, and learning lessons from foreign advanced experience to make recommendations for improvement. It's meaningful for the China's relevant legal studies and improvement.
Key words： network operator; collection and transmission; personal data
Xiang Liling , Wang Jinghui . Comparison of the Domestic and Overseas Legal Norms of Personal Data Collection and Transmission by Network Operators[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(4) : 21 -28 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.04.003
[1] 朱力宇.法理学原理与案例教程[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:47-58.
[2] 王忠. 大数据时代个人数据隐私规制[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014:101-116.
[3] 齐爱民. 个人资料保护法原理及其跨国流通法律问题研究[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:145-148.
[4] 2011 Web economic forum the report: personal data, the emergence of a new asset class[EB/OL].[2015-09-20]. http://www.weforum.org/reports/personal-data-emergence-new-asset-class.
[5] MIKKONEN T. Perceptions of controllers on EU data protection reform: a Finnish perspective[J]. Computer law & security review, 2014, 30(2):190-195.
[6] EU COMMISSION. First report on the implementation of the data protection directive (95/46/EC)[EB/OL].[2015-10-25]. http://aei.pitt.edu/45392/.
[7] CATE F H.美国的隐私保护[M] //周汉华.个人信息保护前沿问题研究.北京:法律出版社,2006:73-104.
[8] 蒋坡. 个人数据信息的法律保护[M]. 北京:中国政府大学出版社,2008:352-361.
[9] 牟凡.中美电子商务消费者信息隐私权保护制度比较研究[D].南京:南京大学,2012.
[10] 张鸿霞,郑宁. 网络环境下隐私权的法律保护研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:160-162. 作者贡献说明: 相丽玲:提出研究思路,设计研究方案,负责最终版本修正; 王景辉:负责文献资料的获取、提供与分析,起草论文。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
