[Purpose/significance] Data centers are key stakeholders in the openly sharing scientific data. This study analyzes the current status and the basic policies of the data centers, and then provides some policy recommendations.[Method/process] Using re3data.org, this paper analyzes the distributions of data center, including content types, data access, data access restrictions, data licenses, metadata standards, permanent identifier systems, quality management, and certificates.[Result/conclusion] Based on the analysis of scientific data centers' policies, the study provides some recommendations, including promoting the openness of scientific data, reasonable allocation of administrative costs, effectively assessing the quality of scientific data and other contents.
Cui Yan
. Policy Analysis and Recommendations on Data Center in the Process of Openly Sharing Scientific Data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016
, 60(8)
: 73
-78
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.08.008
[1] European Commission. Recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information[EB/OL].[2016-03-20].http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf.
[2] MARCIAL L H, HEMMINGER B M. Scientific data repositories on the Web:an initial survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(10):2029-2048.
[3] SUBER P. Open access[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press, 2012.
[4] PAMPEL H, VLERKANT P, SCHOLZE F, et al. Making research data repositories visible:the re3data.org registry[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078080.
[5] CHOUDHURY G S. Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University[J]. Library trends, 2008, 57(2):211-220.
[6] WITT M. Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment[J]. Library trends, 2008, 57(2):191-201.
[7] 林业科学数据中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.cfsdc.org/.
[8] 地球系统科学数据共享平台[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.geodata.cn/.
[9] 人口与健康科学数据共享平台[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.ncmi.cn/1.
[10] 农业科学数据共享中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.agridata.cn/.
[11] 地震科学数据共享中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://data.earthquake.cn/.
[12] 中国气象数据网[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://data.cma.cn/.
[13] 聂华,韦成府,崔海媛. CALIS机构知识库:建设与推广、反思与展望[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2013,39(2):46-52.
[14] 张冬荣,祝忠明,李麟,等. 中国科学院机构知识库建设推广与服务[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(1):20-25.
[15] re3data.org[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://service.re3data.org/.
[16] WDS Certification[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.icsu-wds.org/services/certification.
[17] Data seal of approval[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.datasealofapproval.org.
[18] DDI Alliance[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.ddialliance.org/.
[19] BEAGRIE N, LAVOIE B, WOOLLARD W. Keeping data safe(phase 2)[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.aspx#downloads.
[20] DALLMEIER-TIESSEN S, DARBY R, GITMANS K, et al. Compilation of results on drivers and barriers and new opportunities[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/08/ODE-CompilationResultsDriversBarriersNewOpportunities1.pdf.
[21] RDNL. A federated data infrastructure for the Netherlands:the front-office-back-office model[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.researchdata.nl/fileadmin/content/RDNL_algemeen/Documenten/RDNL_FOBOmodel-UK-web.pdf.
[22] NOORMAN M, KALAITZI V, ANGELAKI M, et al. Institutional barriers and good practice solutions, RECODE D4.1[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://recodeproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/RECODE-D4.1-Institutional-barriers-FINAL.pdf.
[23] DOBRATZ S, RODIG P, BORGHOFF U M, et al. The use of quality management standards in trustworthy digital archives[J].The international journal of digital curation, 2010, 1(5):46-63.
[24] Digital Curation Centre[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/.
