Library and Information Service >
The Time-space Diversion of Classical Bibliography in the Modern Times
Received date: 2016-05-20
Revised date: 2016-06-10
Online published: 2016-06-20
[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of time-space diversion, it will help to reveal the modern situation of classical bibliography and provide an explanation and description for the analysis of modern transformation of traditional culture.[Method/process] From the angle of the mutual construction of books, academics and catalogues, the author systematically combed the modernization process of classical bibliography in the context of the shift of Chinese and Western bibliography.[Result/conclusion] The classical bibliography at all times and in all over the world only recorded "China" and "ancient" books ultimately; while the Western bibliography has grown to be a universal system which is unparalleled in China and the West and beyond time and space. It also provides the theoretical foundation of the bibliography system for the alienation of regional and temporized Western civilization to be the universal truth. Accordingly, subverting the bibliography monism voice of the Western center is an important part to push the world civilization into a healthy ecology of the complementary relation between China and the Western world.
Key words： classical bibliography; literature; culture; modern times; time and space diversion
Fu Rongxian . The Time-space Diversion of Classical Bibliography in the Modern Times[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(12) : 50 -56 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.007
[1] 许纪霖,宋宏.现代中国思想的核心观念[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2011.
[2] 姚名达.中国目录学史[M].上海:上海书店,1984.
[3] 李致忠.三目类序释评[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2002.
[4] 陈祖武,朱彤窗.乾嘉学术编年[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,2005:225.
[5] 邱睿.访求遗书疏[M]//袁咏秋,曾季光.中国历代图书著录文选.北京:北京大学出版社,1997:241.
[6] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1985:1853.
[7] 来新夏.清代目录提要[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1997.
[8] 昌彼得,潘美月.中国目录学[M].台北:文史哲出版社,1991.
[9] 梁启超.清代学术概论[M].朱维铮,校订.北京:中华书局,2011.
[10] 蔡元培.《东西学书录》序[M]//蔡元培全集:第1卷.杭州:浙江教育出版社,1997:224.
[11] 郭嵩焘.条陈海防事宜[M]//中国史学会.洋务运动:第3册.上海:上海人民出版社,2000:143.
[12] 赵惟熙.西学书目答问[M]//熊月之.晚清新学书目提要.上海:上海书店出版社,2014:569.
[13] 熊月之.西学东渐与晚清社会[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:288.
[14] 傅荣贤.中西学术之争与晚清书目分类的历史演进[J].中国学术年刊,2015,37(2):1-21.
[15] 刘简.中文古籍整理分类研究[M].台北:文史哲出版社,1981.
[16] 王国维.论政学疏稿[M]//王国维全集:第14卷.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2009:212.
[17] 严复.严复集:第3册[M].北京:中华书局,1986:558-559.
[18] 俞君立.中国文献分类法百年发展与展望[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002:20-21.
[19] 罗志田.近代"道出于二"语境下学科认同的困惑[J].天津社会科学,2015(1):175-183
[20] 刘大鹏.退想斋日记[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1990:72.
[21] 滕尼斯.广学会大有造于中国说[M]//中国史学会.戊戌变法:第1册.上海:上海人民出版社,2000:214.
[22] 冯自由.政治学[M].上海:广智书局,1902:序言.
[23] 李双璧.从经世到启蒙——近代变革思想演进的历史考察[M].北京:中国展望出版社,1992:218.
[24] 梁启超.新民说[M]//梁启超选集:上.北京:中国文联出版社,2006:211.
[25] MATEER A H.Hand book of new terms and newspaper chinese[M].Shanghai:Presbyterian Mission Press,1917:80
[26] 王先明.近代新学——中国传统学术文化的嬗变与重构[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:18.
[27] 陈天华.劝同乡父老遣子弟航洋游学书[M]//张枬,王忍之.辛亥革命前十年间时论选集:第1卷上册.北京:三联书店,1960:381.
[28] 郝润华,侯富芳.二十世纪以来中国古籍目录提要[Z].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2012:13.
[29] 杜定友.校雠新义:上[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1984.
[30] 霍克海默.批判理论[M].李小兵,译.重庆:重庆出版社,1989:221.
[31] 吴兴明."审美意识形态"与批判理论的学科化[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2):5-11.
[32] 北京大学图书馆学系,武汉大学图书馆学系.图书馆古籍编目[M].北京:中华书局,1985:2.
[33] 傅振伦.编制中文书目之管见[J].北大图书部月刊,1930(1/2):1-18.
[34] 冯桂芬. 采西学议[M]//校邠庐抗议.戴扬本,评注.郑州:中州古籍出版社,1998:221.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
