[Purpose/significance] Under the perspective of multi-attribute evaluation, the timeline of academic periodical's influence index is not unified, and has the temporal heterogeneity. The evaluation objects involve in all the cited papers since periodicals started, the cited papers in the past five years, the cited papers in the past two years, the cited paper in the current year and so on.[Method/process] To solve this problem, this paper takes the S&T management journals included in CSSCI for example, and puts forward two new indexes of impact factor of every other year and the h index of every other year. Then based on grey relational analysis and the cited periodical's data statistics, the rationality of two indexes is verified.[Result/conclusion] Research shows that the design of journal's citation index must respect the principles of timeliness, robustness, annual evaluation and so on; the evaluation of journal's citation index must ensure the timeline consistent as possible when carrying out the multi-attribute evaluation; source index and citation indexes data ofevery other year both come from the papers published in that year, and multi-attribute evaluation timeline has only one essentially.
Yu Liping
. Research on Temporal Heterogeneity and Reconstruction of Journal's Influence Index: Based on the Perspective of Multi-attribute Evaluation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016
, 60(12)
: 109
-114
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.016
[1] BRADFORD B C. Source of information on specific subjects[J]. Engineering,1934(137):85-86.
[2] MARKPIN T, BOONRADSAMEE B, RUKSINSUT K,et al. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database[J]. Scientometrics,2008,75(2), 251-261.
[3] MOED H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of informetrics,2010,4(3):265-277.
[4] KOSMULSKI M. Successful Papers:a New Idea in Evaluation of Scientific Output[J]. Journal of informetrics,2011,5(3):481-485.
[5] FRANCESCHET M. The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences:A bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics,2010(4) 55-63.
[6] SHOTTON D. The five stars of online journal articles-a framework for article evaluation[EB/OL].[2015-09-15].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january12/shotton/01shotton.html.
[7] SOMBATSOMPOP N,KOSITCHAIYONG A,MARKPIN T,et al. Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI database:Thailand case study[J]. Scientomtrics,2006,66(3):521-535.
[8] HAUSTEINA S,SIEBENLIST T. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage[J]. Journal of informetrics,2011,5(3):446-457.
[9] MARK J M,CHRISTOPHER M S. A model of academic journal quality with applications to open access journals[EB/OL].[2015-09-15].HTTP://www.lib.utk.edu/news/scholcomm/archives/2004/11.
[10] MAYR P. Constructing experimental indicators for open Access documents[J]. Research evaluation, 2006,15(2):127-132.
[11] 苏新宁. 构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系[J]. 东岳论丛,2008(1):35-42.
[12] DORTA-GONZALEZ P,DORTA-GONZALEZ M I. Impact maturity times and citation time windows:the 2-year maximum journal impact factor[J]. Journal of informetrics,2013,7(3):593-602.
[13] SEGLEN P O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research[J]. British medical journal,1997,314(7079):498-502.
[14] GARFIELD E. Long-term vs short-term journal impact:does it matter?[J]. Scientist,1998,12(3):11-12.
[15] GARFIELD E. Long-term vs short-term impact:part Ⅱ:the second 100 highest-impact journals[J].Scientist,1998,12(14):12-13.
[16] 刘雪立,盖双双,张诗乐,等. 不同引证时间窗口影响因子的比较研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2014(12):1509-1512.
[17] HIRSCH J.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[A].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[18] BRAUN T, GLANZEL W, ACHUBERT A. A Hirsch-type index for journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2006,69(1):169-173.
[19] CRONIN B, Meho L. Using the h-Index to rank influential information scientists[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 2006,57(9):1275-1278.
[20] 俞立平. 学术期刊h指数的时间演变规律研究[J]. 情报杂志,2015(1):96-99.
[21] 李晓红,于善清. 慎重使用"影响因子"评价科技期刊[J]. 情报科学,2005(1):75-77.
[22] 俞立平. 从时间周期看总被引频次与即年指标评价误区[J]. 中国出版,2014(6):8-11.
