Library and Information Service >
Study on the Frameworks,Indices and Methods of Open Government Data
Received date: 2016-06-26
Revised date: 2016-09-05
Online published: 2016-09-20
[Purpose/significance] With the development of open government data practices around the world, assessments on open data practices increasingly emerge. Comparing and analyzing those assessment projects and further building up frameworks accordingly could provide meaningful references for future assessment projects, and thus foster open government data practices. [Method/process] The paper examined 11 representative assessment projects by analyzing their frameworks, indices and methods and further built up a comprehensive assessment framework. The paper identified five key dimensions in current assessment frameworks including Readiness, Platform, Data, Use and Effect. [Result/conclusion] The study finds that most current assessment projects focus on Data and Readiness, emphasizing assessments on the format, standard and quality of data, the organizational and managerial competence of the government and the legal framework in fostering open data. The assessment on Platform, Use and Effect, however, varies based on the particular development stage of open data practices. Most assessments adopt both qualitative and quantitative methods, and collect subjective and objective data through questionnaires, observation, interviews, and expert review.
Key words： open government data; assessment; framework; index; method
Zheng Lei , Guan Wenwen . Study on the Frameworks,Indices and Methods of Open Government Data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(18) : 43 -55 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.18.006
[1] Open Knowledge. What is open data? open data handbook[EB/OL].[2016-01-10].http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/zh_CN/what-is-open-data/.
[2] Open Data Partnership. What is the open government partnership?[EB/OL].[2016-01-10].http://www.opengovpartnership.org/.
[3] VELJKOVIC' N, BOGDANOVIC'-DINIC' S, STOIMENOV L. Benchmarking open government:an open data perspective[J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(2):278-290.
[4] SAYOGO D S, PARDO T A, COOK M. A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts[C]//Proceedings of the 201447th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Piscataway,NJ:IEEE,2014:1896-1905.
[5] VISCUSI G, SPAHIU B, MAURINO A, et al. Compliance with open government data policies:an empirical assessment of Italian local public administrations[J]. Information polity, 2014, 19(3,4):263-275.
[6] OVIEDO E, MAZON J N, ZUBCOFF J J. Towards a data quality model for open data portals[C]//Computing conference (CLEI), 2013 XXXIX Latin American. Piscataway,NJ:IEEE, 2013:1-8.
[7] SOLAR M, CONCHA G, MEIJUEIRO L.A model to assess open government data in public agencies[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2012:210-221.
[8] HARRISON T M, PARDO T A, COOK M. Creating open government ecosystems:a research and development agenda[J]. Future Internet, 2012, 4(7-8):900-928.
[9] GARCI' A A A, CRIADO M O D U, HEREDERO C D P. Meloda, métrica para evaluar la reutilización de datos abiertos[J]. El profesional de la informacion, 2014, 23(6):582-588.
[10] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M. Open data policies, their implementation and impact:a framework for comparison[J]. Government information quarterly,2014,31(1), 17-29.
[11] ALEXOPOULOS C, LOUKIS E, CHARALABIDIS Y, et al. A methodology for evaluating PSI e-infrastructures based on multiple value models[C]//201216th Panhellenic conference on informatics. Piscataway,NJ:IEEE, 2012:37-43.
[12] SUSHA I, ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M, et al. Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption:usage, limitations, and lessons learned[J]. Social science computer review, 2015, 33(5):613-630.
[13] World Wide Web Foundation and The Governance Lab at NYU.Towards common methods for assessing open data:workshop report & draft framework[EB/OL].[2016-01-10].http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Common%20Assessment%20Workshop%20Report.pdf.
[14] 夏义堃. 国际组织开放政府数据评估方法的比较与分析[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(19):75-83.
[15] HJALMARSSON A, JOHANSSON N, RUDMARK D. Mind the gap:exploring stakeholders' value with open data assessment[C]//48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Piscataway,NJ:IEEE,2015:1314-1323.
[16] World Wide Web Foundation. Open data barometer-global report second edition[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://opendatabarometer.org/assets/downloads/Open%20Data%20Barometer%20-%20Global%20Report%20-%202nd%20Edition%20-%20PRINT.pdf.
[17] Open Knowledge. Open data index[EB/OL].[2016-01-10].http://index.okfn.org.
[18] Division for Public Administration and Developmen Tmanagement (DPADM),UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs(UNDESA).How can we benchmark open government/open government data?[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan050405.pdf.
[19] OECD.Governmentat a glance 2015[EB/OL].Paris:OECD Publishing.[2016-01-10]. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2015_gov_glance-2015-en.
[20] ePSIplatform. The PSI scoreboard[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://www.epsiplatform.eu/content/european-psi-scoreboard.
[21] Open Data Monitor. Methodology of open data monitor[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://opendatamonitor.eu/frontend/web/index.php?r=site%2Fmethodology.
[22] Web Foundation. Open government data feasibility studies[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://webfoundation.org/our-work/projects/open-government-data-feasibility-studies/.
[23] 郑磊, 高丰. 中国开放政府数据平台研究:框架、现状与建议[J]. 电子政务, 2015(7):8-16.
[24] The World Bank's Open Government Data Working Group. Open data readiness assessment users. Part B:methodology[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/odra.html.
[25] Open Data Institute. Open data maturity model[EB/OL].[2016-01-10]. https://theodi.org/guides/maturity-model作者贡献说明:郑磊:制定研究框架与方法,深度数据分析,确立研究发现; 关文雯:搜集文献与资料,初步数据整理与分析。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
