Library and Information Service >
Comparison Research on Local Legislation of National Reading in China
Received date: 2016-07-28
Revised date: 2016-10-20
Online published: 2016-11-05
[Purpose/significance] Legislation of national reading has been the focus of social attention. It is necessary to analyze the local legislation of national reading in Jiangsu, Hubei, Liaoning, Shenzhen and Sichuan to resolve the basic spirit and essence of national reading legislation.[Method/process] The paper analyzes the characteristics and problems of legislation purpose, organization and management, Funds, team construction, service facilities, the social resources integration, the duties of a public library, service key crowd, reading characteristics and brand projects, supervision and evaluation and legal liability in five local regulations etc. [Result/conclusion] This paper presents that our national reading legislation should highlight the prospectiveness and pertinence, take protection of citizen right to read and encouragement of people's participation in the national reading as a key point, achieve national reading resources benefit maximization and optimization, and enhance the enforceability and operability of reading regulations.
Luo Jinzeng . Comparison Research on Local Legislation of National Reading in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(21) : 68 -73 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.21.009
[1] 中国新闻出版研究院.国外全民阅读法律政策译介[M].北京:译林出版社,2015.
[2] 璩静,王帅.全民阅读立法已列入国家立法计划[EB/OL].[2016-09-19].http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2013-08/04/c_116804105.htm.
[3] 付莹."文化权利"视域下深圳阅读立法的价值分析[J].特区理论与实践,2015(1):102-105.
[4] 黄欣,吴遵民.中国终身教育法为何难以制定[J].开放教育研究,2014(6):36-41.
[5] 王宏.我国地方终身教育立法比较及对国家立法的启示[J].开放教育研究,2014(1):74-80.
[6] 太原市终身教育促进条例[J].终身教育,2012(6):42-44.
[7] 洪文梅.公共图书馆在全民阅读活动中的作用与对策[J].图书馆理论与实践,2009(7):85-88.
[8] 王宇,张艳伟.全民阅读从创新发展中走来[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016.
[9] 蒋芳.地方立法如何保障全民阅读[J].瞭望新闻周刊,2016(18):54-55.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |