Library and Information Service >
Changes and Development of Intelligence Studies in China: “Aggression” Thinking, Paradigm Evolution and System Construction
Received date: 2016-07-20
Revised date: 2016-11-08
Online published: 2016-11-20
[Purpose/significance] The arrival of the era of big data pushes the changes and development of intelligence studies. However, the historical legacy and development idea of intelligence studies in China have not got unanimous results or been solved. Discussing the core issues in theory and practice of intelligence studies can help to clarify the development grain of intelligence studies, and grasp the concept orientation and future trend of the discipline. [Method/process] The paper retrospects the debate between "information" and "intelligence" in the field of intelligence studies (information science) in China. On the basis of this, the paper discusses the problem from three aspects of discipline orientation, paradigm evolution and system construction. [Result/conclusion] In conclusion, the intelligence research pattern has achieved remarkable achievements which is upgrading from the fragmented and formalized "information providing" to the collaborative and specialized "intelligence throughput". At the same time, the intelligence work has developed from self-sealing intelligence exploration to the socialized and opening construction of large intelligence system. Hence, under this background, the intelligence studies should break through the traditional thinking set, and devote more attention to research on decision-making level by taking intelligence as the core, specifically carrying out the related theory research and practical application under the intelligence engineering thinking. Only then did we get the chance to realize the dream of intelligence.
Li Yang , Li Gang . Changes and Development of Intelligence Studies in China: “Aggression” Thinking, Paradigm Evolution and System Construction[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(22) : 5 -11 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.22.001
[1] 刘植惠.新情报观[J].情报理论与实践,1999,22(6):389-393.
[2] 包昌火.让中国情报学回归本来面目[J].情报杂志,2011,30(7):1.
[3] 赵冰峰.中国情报学派的兴起与历史使命[J].情报杂志,2016,35(4):1-4.
[4] 谢晓专.情报学"名不副实"的尴尬及其解决之道[J].情报资料工作,2010(3):14-19.
[5] 包昌火.这里的黎明静悄悄——再谈Intelligence与中国情报学[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(8):5-6.
[6] 沈固朝. 两种情报观:Information还是Intelligence?——在情报学和情报工作中引入Intelligence的思考[J]. 情报学报, 2005, 24(3):259-267.
[7] JOHNSON L K. Handbook of intelligence studies[M].London:Routledge, 2006:1-2,58.
[8] 陈峰.中国情报学的宣传推介策略[J].情报杂志,2016,35(3):1-6.
[9] 沈固朝."耳目、尖兵、参谋"——在情报服务和情报研究中引入Intelligence studies的一些思考[J].医学信息学杂志,2009,30(4):1-5.
[10] 王知津,宋正凯.论情报学发展的后现代主义趋势[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(2):145-148.
[11] 李纲,李阳.情报视角下的智库建设研究[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(11):36-41, 61.
[12] 沈固朝.情报与信息:一船两夫——读《隐秘与公开:情报服务与信息科学的追忆与联系》[J].情报探索,2010(2):3-5.
[13] BATTY D. Intelligence work and information science:two men in a boat[M]//WILLIAMS R V, LIPETZ B A. Covert and overt:recollecting and connecting intelligence service and information science. Medford, NJ:Information Today, 2005:25-32.
[14] 包昌火.中国情报研究发展纪实[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(1):1-3.
[15] KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago press, 1962:554-555.
[16] 吴晨生,李辉,付宏,等.情报服务迈向3.0时代[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(9):1-7.
[17] 王飞跃.情报5.0:平行时代的平行情报体系[J].情报学报,2015,34(6):563-574.
[18] 张蕾华.大数据视阈下公安情报研究范式的转变[J].情报杂志,2015,34(7):9-12,28.
[19] HEY T,TANSLEY S,TOLLE K.第四范式:数据密集型科学发现[M].潘教峰,张晓林,等译.北京:科学出版社,2012.
[20] 朱礼军.主编寄语[J].情报工程,2015,1(2):2-3.
[21] 潘云涛,田瑞强.工程化视角下的情报服务——国外情报工程实践的典型案例研究[J].情报学报,2014, 33(12):1242-1254.
[22] 沈固朝.智库热中的一点冷思考[J].智库理论与实践,2016,1(2):137-139.
[23] 苏新宁,朱晓峰.面向突发事件应急决策的快速响应情报体系构建[J].情报学报,2014,33(12):1264-1276.
[24] 李纲,李阳.智慧城市应急决策情报体系构建研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(3):39-54.
[25] Office of Justice Program.Fusion center guidelines[EB/OL].[2016-06-03].https://it.ojp.gov/documents/fusion_center_guidelines_law_enforcement.pdf.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
