Practice and Construction of Evaluation System of library and Information Projects Based on the Whole Process Management Theory: A Case Study of Group Platforms Project

  • Liu Yu ,
  • Yang Zhiping ,
  • Wang Chunming ,
  • Chen Yihong ,
  • Lu Ying
Expand
  • Chengdu Document and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041

Received date: 2016-08-04

  Revised date: 2016-12-08

  Online published: 2016-12-20

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] In this paper, theory and method of the whole process management were integrated into the evaluation of library and information project. As a consequence, a complete set of the whole process management system of library and information project evaluation was constructed, and it was verified by an empirical research of Group Platforms Project. This work provided a referable theoretical model and practical experience for the evaluation of other projects in the field of library and information science. [Method/process] This paper analyzed the influential factors and management features of the evaluation of library and information project under the whole process management concept. Then, it built an evaluation system of library and information projects based on the whole process management concept via four dimensions. Afterwards, a case study of Group Platforms Project was carried out, and an evaluation system of Group Platforms Project based on the whole process management concept was established to implement the project evaluation. [Result/conclusion] This paper analyzed comprehensively the influential factors and management characteristics of the evaluation of library and information project via the four aspects of structural dimension, index dimension, time dimension and strategy dimension. And it designed a set of project evaluation index system covering seven attributes of preliminary basis, team building, construction route, content construction, effectiveness building, management mechanism and sustainable development. Moreover, it formulated five dynamic project evaluation index schemes for the different periods, according to the five time periods of project plan evaluation, project declaration evaluation, project implementation evaluation, project acceptance evaluation and project post-construction evaluation in the whole process of project evaluation management. Besides, it developed a number of implementation strategies to enhance the management effectiveness of project evaluation. Therefore, the construction of evaluation system of Group Platforms Project based on the whole process management concept effectively made the project evaluation more orderly, reasonable and systematic.

Cite this article

Liu Yu , Yang Zhiping , Wang Chunming , Chen Yihong , Lu Ying . Practice and Construction of Evaluation System of library and Information Projects Based on the Whole Process Management Theory: A Case Study of Group Platforms Project[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(24) : 76 -85 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.24.011

References

[1] STEPHEN M, WILLIAM C. Health program evaluation[M]. St. Louis:The C.V. Mosby Company, 1978.
[2] CATHY L. Health program evaluation[J]. Health services research, 1980, 15(1):69-71.
[3] WEISS C H. Evaluation:methods for studying programs and policies[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall, 1998.
[4] 戚安邦.项目管理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[5] 席相霖.解析项目管理[J].中国经济和信息化,2002(11):33.
[6] ROGER A. Project management:cost, time and quality two best guesses and a phenomenon, it's time to accept other success criteria[J].International journal of project management, 1999, 17(6):337-342.
[7] LAND R. Assessing project worth at budget time[C]//Proceedings of the American power conference:moving ahead while protecting the environment. Chicago:Illinois Institute of Technology, 1992:906-917.
[8] SAAD M, CICMIL S, GREENWOOD M. Technology transfer projects in developing countries-furthering the project management perspectives[J]. International journal of project management, 2002, 20(8):617-625.
[9] ZIDANE Y, JOHANSEN A, EKAMBARAM A. Project evaluation holistic framework-application on megaproject case[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015,64:409-416.
[10] 郝小云,党晓峰.石油企业科研项目管理与评价模式的研究与应用[J].石油化工应用,2008,27(2):10-13.
[11] LI M, YANG N. Research on the evaluation system of IT project[EB/OL].[2017-01-07] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=5362636.
[12] 武倩文.科研院所科研项目全过程绩效评价指标体系研究[J].经济师,2016(3):71-72.
[13] 张翼,白莹.林业信息化项目建设中的全过程评价研究[J].产业与科技论坛,2014,13(22):229-230.
[14] 肖人毅.面向过程的科研项目评价方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.
[15] 杨志萍.群组集成知识平台可持续发展能力建设应用实践.[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(7/8):1-5.
[16] 杨志萍,吴鸣.中国科学院文献情报系统学科馆员服务发展能力建设[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):12-16.
[17] 黄铭瑞,王化,张清,等.CEODE-CAS群组集成知识平台应用实践[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(10):72-76.
[18] LIU Y, FU J, ZHENG H, et al. Development and application of knowledge-based subject group integration platforms:a case study of Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, CAS[J]. Chinese journal of library and information science, 2014, 7(2):1-14.

Outlines

/