Library and Information Service >
Deep Explorations and Practical Activities of Embedded Information literacy Education Based on Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education by ACRL: A Case study of Nankai University Library
Received date: 2016-11-01
Revised date: 2016-12-20
Online published: 2017-01-05
[Purpose/significance] The Association of College and Research Libraries(ACRL)published Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (Framework) in 2015, and how to implement it according to local conditions is the focus of the academic libraries and information literacy librarians.[Method/process] By using case study method, this paper analyses the embedded information literacy teaching activities carried by the Nankai University Library based on Framework.This paper tracks and displays the practical path of the whole activities from macro to micro, including the interpretation of the contents of the document, the feasibility analysis and the implementation and sharing with the collaborators.[Result/conclusion] According to the experiences of Nankai University Library, this article points out that to implement the Framework must combine with the actual situation of colleges and universities, and summarizes some key points during the concrete practical process, such as to determine the appropriate teaching content and mode, pay attention to cooperate with the departmental partners, and to introduce the "threshold concept" by analyzing the academic context in on-site teaching situation.
Zhang Di . Deep Explorations and Practical Activities of Embedded Information literacy Education Based on Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education by ACRL: A Case study of Nankai University Library[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(1) : 47 -55 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.01.006
[1] ACRL.Informationliteracy competency standards for higher education[EB/OL].[2016-02-20].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
[2] ACRL.Framework for information literacy for higher education[EB/OL].[2016-02-20].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
[3] ACRL.Framework for information literacy for higher education(Chinese translation)[EB/OL].[2016-02-20].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/framework-chinese.pdf.
[4] 韩丽风,王茜,李津,等.高等教育信息素养框架[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(6):111-113.
[5] 杨鹤林.元素养:美国高等教育信息素养新标准前瞻[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2014(3):5-9.
[6] 杨鹤林.阈值概念:构建美国《高等教育信息素养框架》[J]. 图书馆杂志,2016(5):68-74.
[7] 刘彩娥,冯素洁.ACRL的《高等教育信息素养框架》解读与启示[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(5):143-147.
[8] 秦小燕.美国高校信息素养标准的改进与启示——ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》解读[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(10):139-144.
[9] 桂罗敏.从技术到价值:《美国高等教育信息素养框架》的文化阐释[J]. 图书情报知识,2016(2):14-20,68.
[10] FOASBERG N M.From standards to frameworks for IL:how the ACRL framework addresses critiques of the standards[J]. Portal:libraries and the academy,2015,15(4):699-717.
[11] 李瞳,叶志锋.基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的我国高校信息素养教材质量评价与编写建议[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(8):54-59.
[12] 符绍宏,高冉.《高等教育信息素养框架》指导下的信息素养教育改革[J]. 图书情报知识,2016(3):26-32.
[13] REED K L.Squarepeg in a round hole?theframework for information literacy in the community college environment[J]. Journal of library administration, 2015,55(3):235-248.
[14] OAKLEAF M. A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2014 (5):510-514.
[15] 南开大学图书馆.2016-2017第一学期南开大学图书馆讲坛系列讲座[EB/OL].[2016-02-20].http://www.lib.nankai.edu.cn/news/tzgg/844.html.
[16] 南开大学图书馆.南开大学学科服务团队:学科馆员.[EB/OL] [2016-09-30].http://www.lib.nankai.edu.cn/libservice/xkfwtd.
[17] 孙坦,初景利. 图书馆嵌入式学科服务的理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2015.
[18] 张蒂.学科馆员服务从联络到嵌入的转变——南开大学图书馆的实践与思考[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(7):90-97.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
