Library and Information Service >
The Study of Information Visibility on Internet
Received date: 2016-09-22
Revised date: 2017-01-04
Online published: 2017-01-20
[Purpose/significance] The development and application of the Internet put forward new requirements for information and library science theory research.This study discusses about the significance and implementation of the information visibility. Theoretical discussion can make a better understanding and using of the information on Internet.[Method/process] The paper does the study using literature analysis method, comparison method and phenomenological method. By the analysis about the information behavior practitioners on Internet, we discuss their existence and its information visibility, and the idea behind their behaviors. [Result/conclusion] We get a conclusion that information visibility has four different dimensions of meanings, depth visibility, shadow visibility, aesthetics visibility, and symbol visibility. They are a unified whole, indispensable. Comprehensive information visibility can make us thinking about the value and meaning of the communicative action, and adjusting our strategies and behaviors. It can promote understanding and coordination, avoid loss and damage. Love and wisdom is the culture and values of information visibility, of which the Other is the main topic.
Key words： Internet; information visibility; man and information; significance; idea
Zhu Aiju . The Study of Information Visibility on Internet[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(2) : 50 -56 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.02.006
[1] 波斯特.第二媒介时代[M].范静晔,译.南京:南京大学出版社,1995.
[2] DAYAN D.Conquering visibility, conferring visibility: visibility seekers and media performance[J]. International journal of communication,2013,7(1):137-153.
[3] OCHOLLA D, MOSTERT J, ROTICH D C. Visibility of University of Zululand and Moi University researchers in Web of Science and Scopus from 2003 to 2013[J]. African journal of library archives and information science,2016,26(1):3-15.
[4] HOLLIDAY I. Building e-Government in East and Southeast Asia: regional rhetoric and national action[J]. Public administration and development,2010,22(4):323-335.
[5] FONS T. Making libraries visible on the web[J]. Library journal, 2016,141(13):44-46.
[6] MON L,LEE J. Influence, reciprocity, participation, and visibility: assessing the social library on Twitter[J]. Canadian journal of information and library science,2015,39(3/4):279-294.
[7] LEONARDI P M. Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: toward a theory of communication visibility[J]. Information systems research,2014,25(4):196-816.
[8] 孙玮,李梦颖."可见性":社会化媒体与公共领域——以占海特"异地中考"事件为例[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2014(2):37-44.
[9] 杨学山.论信息[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2016.
[10] MERLEAU-PONTY M. The visible and the invisible[M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press,1968.
[11] 梅洛-庞蒂.符号[M].姜志辉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
[12] 胡塞尔.欧洲科学的危机与超越论的现象学[M].王炳文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[13] 梅洛-庞蒂.知觉现象学[M].姜志辉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[14] 哈贝马斯.后形而上学思想[M].曹卫东,付德根,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
[15] 许茨.现象学哲学研究[M].霍桂桓,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2012.
[16] 芬克.胡塞尔现象学的操作概念.黄文宏,译[C]//倪梁康.面对事实本身——现象学经典文学.北京:东方出版社,2000:588-605.
[17] 曲维芝.信息社会:概念、经验与选择[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.
[18] 拉什.信息批判[M].杨德睿,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
[19] 列维纳斯.总体与无限:论外在性[M].朱刚,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2016.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
