Library and Information Service >
Research on the Matthew Effect Between Fairness and Efficiency of Regional Public Libraries in China
Received date: 2016-11-18
Revised date: 2016-12-23
Online published: 2017-01-20
[Purpose/significance] The design of coordinated development path of fairness and efficiency is of great significance for our public libraries to maintain the coordinated development of equalization and efficiency in the "13th Five-Year".[Method/process] The paper firstly measures the efficiency of the public libraries of all provinces in our country by using the super efficiency DEA model,and uses the financial subsidy income to measure the fairness of regional public libraries in China, then examines the "Matthew effect" of fairness and efficiency with the Markov chain model. Exploring who should get priority of government, finally the implementation path of the coordinated development of fairness and efficiency is designed based on two dimensional matrix.[Result/conclusion] There is a serious Matthew effect in the fairness of public libraries in our country while the efficiency is weak.The government should focus on solving the problems of "long-term unfair" in the public library of our country.Specifically, the government should support those regions that "have high efficiency but low financial subsidy income" accurately.
Key words： public library; fairness; efficiency; Matthew effect; Markov chain
Zhou Di . Research on the Matthew Effect Between Fairness and Efficiency of Regional Public Libraries in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(2) : 67 -73 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.02.008
[1] 周文杰.公益性信息服务能够促进信息公平吗?——公共图书馆对信息贫富分化的干预效果考察[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(4):40-54.
[2] 吴正荆,刘秉宇,袁艺.社会信息公平评价指标体系及实证调查研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(2):22-26.
[3] 葛霞.公共图书馆资源配置的地区差异比较与分析——以浙江、湖北、青海三省为例[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32(7):104-107.
[4] 鞠树成,马运来.我国公共图书馆资源的区域差异分析[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(11):84-87.
[5] 陆浩东.从"马太效应"看图书馆公共信息服务均等化推进[J].图书馆论坛,2011,31(2):18-21.
[6] 郭海明.信息公平视域下的公共图书馆普遍均等服务[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(5):71-74,94.
[7] 洪凯.公共图书馆基本服务均等化:目标、途径与保障条件——基于公共政策分析视角[J].图书馆论坛,2010,30(1):104-107.
[8] 胡弢.我国公共图书馆服务均等化测度及空间格局分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(7):83-90.
[9] 郭军华.区域公共图书馆效率测度及环境影响因素分析——基于DEA-Tobit两步法的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(13):87-90.
[10] 朱相宇.我国省际公共图书馆效率的国际评价与分析[J].图书馆论坛,2014,34(6):32-37.
[11] 陈英,洪源.考虑环境因素的我国省域公共图书馆效率测度及优化治理——基于三阶段DEA方法[J].图书馆学研究,2015(11):17-25.
[12] 王惠,钱旦敏,李小聪.基于DEA和SFA方法的公共图书馆效率测评研究[J].国家图书馆学刊,2014(2):19-25.
[13] 王惠.我国公共图书馆静态和动态效率测评分析[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(1):30-36.
[14] 陈琳.公共图书馆制度的公平与效率问题研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(7):26-29.
[15] 郭正武.公平与效率视角下的图书馆服务全民共享[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(13):54-57.
[16] 徐享王.基于"效率"与"公平"共生的图书馆服务能力提升战略取向[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(7):108-110.
[17] ANDERSEN P, PETERSEN N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis[J].Management science, 1993, 39(10):1261-1264.
[18] 周迪,程慧平.中国农业现代化发展水平时空格局及趋同演变[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(1):25-35.
[19] 张虎,周迪.我国高等教育公平与效率"马太效应"比较及协调发展实施路径——基于1995-2012年分省份数据的实证研究[J].教育发展研究,2015(Z1):12-18,28.
[20] LE GALLO J. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: a Markov chains approach[J]. International regional science review, 2004, 27(2): 138-163.
[21] 储节旺,储伊力.我国省域公共图书馆效率测评及影响因素分析——基于Super-SBM与Tobit模型的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(22):33-38,55.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
