Library and Information Service >
Talent Assessment Services: the Implementation Strategy of University Library Service Transformation
Received date: 2016-12-29
Revised date: 2017-02-16
Online published: 2017-03-05
[Purpose/significance] Talent evaluation service based on academic achievements could be a new direction of the university library service transformation and development. Through the discussion of the methods and achievements of the auxiliary talents evaluation of the university library, the paper could promotethe popularization and development of the service, and could provide method reference for the university library to carry out similar service. [Method/process] In this paper, we use the case analysis method, analyze Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library's service practice, and focus on the propulsion locus, transformation of index system, the key problems, thought process and solutions. [Result/conclusion] It summarizes the general fitness problems which need to be continue thinking:how to combine the demand driven and demand traction, and promote the sustainable development of the service; step by step, promote the service scope according to the staffing and process control; follow up the new ideas and progress of science and technology evaluation, and persistent thinking about the best combination of theory and practice constantly.
Yang Mei , Fan Xiufeng , Pan Wei , Dong Wenjun , Dong Jue , Tang Lihua . Talent Assessment Services: the Implementation Strategy of University Library Service Transformation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(5) : 29 -34 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.05.004
[1] 陈传夫, 冯吕扬, 陈一.面向全面小康的图书馆常态化转型发展模式探索[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016,42(1):4-20.
[2] 宋振世, 周健, 吴士蓉. h指数科研评价实践中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(1):117-121.
[3] 清华大学图书馆.文献计量分析服务[EB/OL].[2016-12-19]. http://lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/service/docqua.html.
[4] 同济大学图书馆. 学者科研绩效评价报告[EB/OL].[2016-12-19]. http://www.lib.tongji.edu.cn/ia/?cat=24.
[5] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[6] EGGHE L. Theory and practise of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1):131-152.
[7] JIN B, LIANG L, ROUSSEAU R, et al. The R-and AR-indices:complementing the h-index[J].Chinese science bulletin, 2007, 52(6):855-863.
[8] 叶鹰.一种学术排序新指数——f指数探析[J]. 情报学报, 2009, 28(1):142-149.
[9] 陈福佑, 杨立英, 丁洁兰. 不同学科期刊学术影响力比较的方法与实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(23):85-89, 94.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
