Library and Information Service >
Research on Distribution of Similarity of Research Interests Between Coauthors
Received date: 2016-11-21
Revised date: 2017-01-04
Online published: 2017-03-20
[Purpose/significance] Coauthorship is an important research topic in scientrometrics, so exploring the preferences among authors when choosing the partners from the perspective of the research interest has important theory significance.[Method/process] By analyzing and dividing the case of coauthors and calculating the similarity, we visualize the distribution of similarity of research interests between coauthors.[Result/conclusion] The result show that authors in different disciplines show similar tendency when choosing their partner, and more productive authors tend to choose those having similar study interests.
Key words: study interest; coauthors; comparative analysis; similarity; distribution
Li Gang , Xu Jian , Mao Jin , Zhou Liqin . Research on Distribution of Similarity of Research Interests Between Coauthors[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(6) : 92 -98 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.06.015
[1] 丛杭青,王华平,沈琪.合作研究及其认识论评价[J].科学学研究,2004,22(5):455-459.
[2] 谢彩霞,刘则渊.科研合作及其科研生产力功能[J].科学技术哲学研究,2006,23(1):99-102.
[3] 卢东.图书情报学领域作者合著方式对科研质量的影响分析——基于SciVal对中国高产机构的样本分析[J].现代情报,2015,35(9):111-115.
[4] 孟微,庞景安.我国情报学科研合著网络研究及其特征参数分析[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32(8):12-15.
[5] 樊霞,陈丽明,杨小婉.985高校SCIE论文中的校企合著现象——规模、强度与国际影响力变迁[J].高等工程教育研究,2015(6):67-71.
[6] 金炬,马峥,梁战平.从中美合著论文状况看中美科技合作[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(5):41-47.
[7] 吕娜.合著成果中"伪合作"关系的表现及成因分析[J].情报杂志,2014(10):101-103.
[8] 贡金涛,戚音,魏莉,等.基于指导关系的合著者荣誉分配研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(1):76-81.
[9] 赵蓉英,温芳芳.科研合作与知识交流[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(20):6-10.
[10] 贾茜,李亚婷,张斌.科学合作的形成及其影响因素[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(6):40-45.
[11] 苗蕊,刘鲁.科学家合作网络中的社区发现[J].情报学报,2011,30(12):1312-1318.
[12] 李树青,孙颖.一种基于Web请求访问模式和时间片震荡算法的便携式个性化服务框架[J].情报学报,2014,33(3):228-238.
[13] 邱均平,刘国徽,董克.基于合作分析的知识聚合与学科知识结构研究——以国内知识管理领域为例[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(8):6-11.
[14] GHOSH R,DEKHIL M. Mashups for semantic user profiles[C]//International conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM,2008:1229-1230.
[15] CHEN T, HAN W L, WANG H D, et al. Content recommendation system based on private dynamic user profile[C]//International conference on machine learning and cybernetics. Hong Kong:IEEE,2007:2112-2118.
[16] STEYVERS M, SMYTH P, ROSEN M, et al. Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery[C]//Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. New York:ACM, 2004:306-315.
[17] 李纲,李岚凤,毛进,等.作者合著网络中研究兴趣相似性实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2015(2):75-81.
[18] 巴志超,李纲,朱世伟.基于语义网络的研究兴趣相似性度量方法[J].现代图书情报技术,2016, 32(4):81-90.
[19] 刘萍,郭月培,郭怡婷.利用作者关键词网络探测作者相似性[J].现代图书情报技术,2013(12):62-69.
[20] KIMS Y. A study on author co-citation of Korean literature[J]. Journal of information management, 1988, 19(1):73-94.
[21] ZHAO D,STROTMANN A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005:introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(13):2070-2086.
[22] 刘志辉,张志强.作者关键词耦合分析方法及实证研究[J].情报学报,2010,29(2):268-275.
[23] 孙海生.作者关键词共现网络及实证研究[J].情报杂志,2012(9):63-67.
[24] PORTER M F. An algorithm for suffix stripping[J]. Program, 1980, 14(3):130-137.
[25] 丁学东.文献计量学基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992:204-209,220-232.
/
〈 | 〉 |