[Purpose/significance] It is difficult to describe the complicated association and fuzzy semantics in narrative cultural heritage by only using images or files, because they have rich implicit knowledge and semantic information. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the effective organization and representation of narrative cultural heritage.[Method/process] This paper constructed a multi-granularity, multi-angle and semantic-fluent knowledge representation framework based on the role-link knowledge representation for the narrative cultural heritage. This representation selected the main elements of the story as knowledge factors. Aggregation and specialization were used to represent the role-link among knowledge factors. Finally, this paper formed the representation structure in a graph.[Result/conclusion] This method has the advantages of semantic nature, strong extensibility, support for diversified retrieval, and also solving problems such as the lack of context dependence, single representation perspective occurring in the existing knowledge representation method.
Li Xuhui
,
Wu Yanqiu
,
Wang Xiaoguang
. Research on Knowledge Representation of Narrative Cultural Heritage Based on Role-links[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(9)
: 116
-122
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.015
[1] TAN G, HAO T, ZHONG Z. A knowledge modeling framework for intangible cultural heritage based on ontology[EB/OL].[2016-11-10]. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5362170/.
[2] CHATEAU S, BOULANGER D. Managing the domain knowledge:application to cultural patrimony[J]. Knowledge management research & practice, 2012, 10(4):312-325.
[3] KAKALI C, LOURD I, STASINOPOULOU T, et al. Integrating dublin core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies[EB/OL].[2016-12-13]. http://www.ics.forth.gr/_publications/871-871-1-PB-1.pdf.
[4] 郝挺雷. 传统节日知识本体的构建及表示方法研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2011.
[5] 孙传明. 民俗舞蹈类非物质文化遗产数字化技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2013.
[6] MANN C J H. The description logic handbook-theory, implementation and applications[J]. Kybernetes, 2003, 32(9/10):359-381.
[7] HIDDERS J. Typing graph-manipulation operations[EB/OL].[2016-12-06]. http://win.ua.ac.be/~adrem/bibrem/pubs/hidders.3.pdf.
[8] PECKHAM J, MARYANSKI F. Semantic data models[J]. ACM computing surveys, 1988, 20(3):153-189.
[9] URBAN S D, DELCAMBRE L.M.L. An analysis of the structural, dynamic, and temporal aspects of semantic data models[EB/OL].[2016-12-20]. http://omega.sp.susu.ru/books/acm_sigmod/vol2/is6/ICDE86/P382.pdf.
[10] CHENP S. The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data[J]. Readings in artificial intelligence & databases, 1989, 1(1):98-111.
[11] KERSCHBERG L, PACHECO J E S. A functional database model[EB/OL].[2016-12-20]. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/280624223_A_Functional_Database_Model.
[12] HAMMER M, MC LEOD D. Database description with SDM:a semantic database model[J]. ACM transactions on database systems, 1981, 6(3):351-386.
[13] HULL R, KING R. Semantic database modeling:survey, applications, and research issues[J]. ACM computing surveys, 1987, 19(3):201-260.
[14] BERLER M, EASTMAN J, JORDAN D, et al. The object data standard:ODMG 3.0[EB/OL].[2016-12-20]. http://globis.ethz.ch/files/2015/02/ODMG.pdf.
[15] GOTTLOB G, SCHREFL M, ROCK B. Extending object-oriented systems with roles[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 1995, 14(3):268-296.
[16] SCIORE E. Object specialization[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 1989, 7(2):103-122.
[17] DAHCHOUR M, PIROTTE A, ZIMANYI E. A role model and its metaclass implementation[J]. Information systems, 2004, 29(3):235-270.
[18] DAHCHOUR M, PIROTTE A, ZIMANYI E. A generic role model for dynamic objects[EB/OL].[2016-12-23]. http://helios.mm.di.uoa.gr/~rouvas/ssi/caise2002/23480643.pdf.
[19] BERTINO E, GUERRINI G. Objects with multiple most specific classes[EB/OL].[2016-12-27]. http://www. researchgate.net/publication/221496209_Objects_with_Multiple_Most_Specific_Classes.
[20] 胡婕. 面向复杂关系和上下文语境信息的模型研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2010.
[21] 王知津.知识组织理论与方法[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2009:18-19.
