[Purpose/significance] To form a more objective evaluation of scientific research, stimulate China's research innovation, and curb academic misconduct, from the perspective of following the law of scientific development, this paper thinks that the dimensions of research evaluation should be diversified and try to extract three dimensions of innovation, influence and transmission.[Method/process] First of all, this paper discussed the three dimensions of the generation mechanism, importance, evaluation predicament and progress, and mutual relations.Secondly, the paper chose indices to represent the three dimensions to analyze their correlation, index of different dimensions associated evaluation type and probability, the role of fusion evaluation of dimension and diffusion stage.[Result/conclusion] The conclusions are as follows: different evaluation dimensions should be established in the index system of scientific research evaluation, and each dimension has rich indexes; the dimension of each index should be clear; multiple indicators should be used in the evaluation, value fusion evaluation.Finally, the evaluation dimensions of "Creativity- Influence- Transmission", as well as the prospect of multidimensional evaluation in a broader sense, were discussed, including enhancing the flexibility, pertinence, objectivity and explanatory power of scientific evaluation; the discovery of potential talents and innovation, providing broad space for evaluation indexes jumping based on network structure from based on the number; avoiding the "evaluation trap"; encouraging deep research and innovation and eradicating academic atmosphere, guiding academic publishing and writing norms; enhancing peer insight.
Song Ge
. Building and Demonstrating“Creativity- Influence- Transmission” Research Evaluation Dimensions[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(10)
: 5
-13
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.10.001
[1] 楚宾,哈克特.难有同行的科学[M].谭文华,曾国屏,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011:126.
[2] BARBER B.Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery[J].Science, 1961, 134(347):596-602.
[3] ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.Technology in retrospect and critical events in science[R].Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute, 1969.
[4] COLE S.Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries[J].American journal of sociology, 1970, 76(2): 286-306.
[5] STENT G S.Prematurity and uniquenessin scientific discovery[J].Scientific American, 1972, 227(6):84-93.
[6] RAAN A F J V.Sleeping beauties in science[J].Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
[7] 李江.零被引论文都是垃圾吗?[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1792012-994641.html.
[8] 罗杰斯.创新的扩散[M].辛欣,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2002:86-90.
[9] 苏畅.丁肇中东大趣谈科学是少数人推翻多数人观念[EB/OL].[2016-09-11].http://js.people.com.cn/html/2012/06/03/114111.html.
[10] 陈超美.转折点:创造性的本质[M].陈悦,王贤文,胡志刚,等译.北京:科学出版社,2015:62.
[11] KOSMULSKIM.Successful papers: anew idea in evaluation of scientific output[J].Journal of informetrics, 2011,5(3):481-485.
[12] 钱玲飞,杨建林,邓三鸿.人文社会科学学科创新力单指标评价[J].图书与情报,2013(2):93-98.
[13] CHEN C.CiteSpace Ⅱ: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[14] 宋歌.网络结构视域下的创新潜力指标研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(3):64-71.
[15] 宋歌.科研成果创新力指标S指数的设计与实证[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):77-86, 124.
[16] PIROLLI P.Information foraging theory: adaptive interaction with information[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 14-16.
[17] GLANZEL W, GARFIELD E.The myth of delayed recognition[J].Scientist, 2004, 18(11): 8-9.
[18] 孙学军.好论文同样会被拒稿[EB/OL].[2016-10-11].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-853652.html.
[19] HOLTON G.Scientific research and scholarship: notes toward the design of proper scales[J].Daedalus, 1962, 91(2):362-399.
[20] 克兰.无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M].刘珺珺,顾昕,王德禄,译.北京:华夏出版社,1988: 26,63.
[21] GARFIELD E, SHER I H, TORPIE R J.The use of citation datain writing the history of science[R].Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 1964:3.
[22] 红枫.论文淘汰率再引关注研究论文越老越吃香[EB/OL].[2016-11-11].http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2014/11/306886.shtm.
[23] 宋歌.学术创新的扩散过程研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(1):62-75.
[24] NOOY W, MRVAR A, BATAGELJ V.Exploratory social network analysis with pajek: revised and expanded second edition[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,2011:244-246.
[25] GARFIELD E, WELLJAMSDOROF A.Of Nobel class- a citation perspective on high-impact research authors[J].Theoretical medicine, 1992, 13(2): 117-135.
