[Purpose/significance] The individual user is an important source of the document sharing platform. Analyzing the copyright awareness in the use of professional academic literature from the users' point of view may provide advice for the balance of copyright and sharing.[Method/process] Through the questionnaire survey, the authors obtained ten kinds of subdivision behavior characteristics and copyright consciousness in the process of using Baidu Wenku by domestic 309 college teachers and graduate students. This paper summarized the individual user's attitudes and perceptions about sharing academic literature from the aspects of the ownership of copyright, whether to pay, document source and copyright rules.[Result/conclusion] The results show that the frequency of the sample users to upload their proprietary literature is the lowest in all the behavior. However, once their documents are uploaded, they show a high awareness of copyright. There is a big difference between users' views on uploading and downloading the documents. It is considered that there is a higher possibility of copyright infringement. It is worth noting that there are more than 2/3 of the sample users rarely paying attention to the copyright rules of the platform.
Luo Xiaolan
,
Chen Qun
. The Users' Awareness of Copyright Protection and Behavior of the Professional Academic Literature Usage in the Online Document Sharing Platform[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(17)
: 67
-75
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.17.009
[1] 周庆山,罗戎. 我国数字文化产业发展趋势、挑战与规制策略[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(10):6-10,18.
[2] 张驰. 论我国网络版权保护法律制度的完善[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2012:21-22.
[3] 沈菲. 我国UGC版权侵权治理机制之优化——以美国UGC规则为样本的考察[J]. 编辑之友,2017(3):77-80.
[4] 意大利为打击盗版封杀46家文档分享网站[J]. 信息与电脑(理论版),2014(1):119.
[5] 李彦,叶文芳. 互联网版权纠纷与传统媒体转型——基于"中青文诉百度文库侵权"等四个案件的分析[J]. 科技与出版,2014(12):74-78.
[6] 蔡丽萍. 从百度文库纠纷探讨数字信息分享平台版权解决方案[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2011(15):99-100.
[7] 王亮,刘阳,张丽. 构建移动互联网环境下的版权生态链[J]. 科技与出版,2015(9):66-69.
[8] 刘一鸣,任诗然. 网络文库商业模式探究[J]. 中国出版,2013(18):50-53.
[9] JAGLOM A R. Liability online:copyright and tort risks of providing content, or who's in charge here?-part I[J]. The computer & internet lawyer,2016,33(1):8-30.
[10] 罗晓兰,李明. 网络免费学术资源分享及使用行为初探——以百度文库为例[J]. 现代情报,2017(1):100-105.
[11] 百度文库协议[EB/OL].[2017-04-17].https://wenku.baidu.com/portal/browse/help#help/20.
[12] 史志伟.从版权纠纷刊互联网版权保护——以百度文库为例[J].青年记者,2013(3):63-64.
[13] 狄志龙. 网络服务商侵权责任认定及其侵权防范[D]. 桂林:广西师范大学, 2012:5-9.
[14] 李广欣. 网络文档分享平台中的学术论文数字版权保护[J].科技与出版,2016(12):84-89.
[15] 方圆. 探讨文档分享平台侵权责任界定[N]. 中国新闻出版报,2014-09-25(2).
[16] 姚平. 我国网络文库运营模式研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2015.
[17] 张丹, 龚晓林. 大学图书馆参与MOOC版权服务的实践及启示——以杜克大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(10):90-93.
[18] 白娟. MOOC发展中的版权管理分析与数字版权保护[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(S1):37-40.
[19] 刘钟美, 张新鹤. 开放获取环境下我国科研人员对知识产权制度的认知与态度[J].图书情报工作, 2016,60(16):50-60.
[20] 朱娜娜. 社会化媒体中的信息版权保护机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(S2):42-45.
[21] 李婵, 张文德, 蓝以信. 基于可拓理论的网络信息资源著作权侵权风险评估[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(13):22-30.
[22] LEISTNER M. Copyright law on the internet in need of reform:hyperlinks, online platforms and aggregators[J]. Journal of intellectual property law & practice, 2017, 12(2):136-149.
