[Purpose/significance] With the rapid development of open government data in the world, open government data assessments emerge in research and practice. Analyzing features of these assessments helps to take a more appropriate way to assess future open government data projects, which sustains the development of open government data.[Method/process] With a review of research and practice on the typical current assessment research and programs of open government data, this paper focused on different features of all kinds of assessment systems, which were characterized by different motivations, metrics and methods.[Result/conclusion] The study shows that there are limitations in the assessments which can be applicable to urban fields, specific industry fields and open data maturity assessment. Meanwhile, the study reveals that the assessment metrics and methods should be selected according to different assessment motivations. It is suggested to establish an iteration inspection mechanism.
Wei Xinling
,
An Xiaomi
,
Li Xuemei
,
Ming Xin
,
Yu Weijian
. A Review of Research and Practice on Open Government Data Assessment:Features and Patterns[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(18)
: 119
-127
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.18.016
[1] What is open data? Open data handbook[EB/OL].[2017-04-13] http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/zh_CN/what-is-open-data/.
[2] 陈涛,李明阳. 数据开放平台建设策略研究——以武汉市政府数据开放平台建设为例[J]. 电子政务,2015(7):46-52.
[3] 国务院关于印发促进大数据发展行动纲要的通知[EB/OL].[2017-04-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-09/05/content_10137.htm.
[4] 中共中央办公厅关于印发国家信息化发展战略纲要的通知[EB/OL].[2017-05-02].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5100032.htm.
[5] BERNERS-LEE T. Linked data:design issues[EB/OL].[2017-08-21].http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
[6] HÖCHTL J, REICHSTÄDTER P. Linked open data-a means for public sector information management[C]//International conference on electronic government and the information systems perspective. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011:330-343.
[7] KALAMPOKIS E, TAMBOURIS E, TARABANIS K. Open government data:a stage model[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011:235-246.
[8] KASCHESKY M, SELMI L. Fusepool R5 linked data framework:concepts, methodologies, and tools for linked data[C]//Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on digital government research. New York:ACM, 2013:156-165.
[9] VETRÒ A, CANOVA L, TORCHIANO M, et al. Open data quality measurement framework:definition and application to open government data[J]. Government information quarterly, 2016,33(2):325-337
[10] YU H, ROBINSON D G. The new ambiguity of ‘open government’[J]. 2012, 59(1):178-208
[11] SAULLES M D. Open data and open government in the UK:how closely are they related?[C]//Proceedings of the 13th European conference on e-government. Como:Academic conferences and publishing international, 2013:160-165.
[12] ALEXOPOULOS C, LOUKIS E, CHARALABIDIS Y, et al. A methodology for evaluating PSI E-infrastructures based on multiple value models[C]//Proceedings of 16th panhellenic conference on informatics. Washington:IEEE, 2012:37-43.
[13] 王今,马海群. 政府开放数据质量的用户满意度评价研究[J]. 现代情报,2016(9):4-9.
[14] Open Government Working Group. 8 principles of open government data[EB/OL].[2017-04-10].https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html.
[15] BOGDANOVI?-DINI? S, VELJKOVI? N, STOIMENOV L. How open are public government data? An assessment of seven open data portals[M]//Measuring e-government efficiency. New York:Springer, 2014:25-44.
[16] SAYOGO D S, PARDO T A, COOK M. A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts[C]//201447th Hawaii international conference onsystem sciences.Washington:IEEE,,2014:1896-1905.
[17] 徐慧娜,郑磊. 面向用户利用的开放政府数据平台:纽约与上海比较研究[J]. 电子政务,2015(7):37-45.
[18] 曹雨佳. 政府开放数据生存状态:来自我国19个地方政府的调查报告[J]. 图书情报工作,2016,60(14):94-101.
[19] 马海群,唐守利. 基于结构方程的政府开放数据网站服务质量评价研究[J]. 现代情报,2016(9):10-15,33.
[20] 邹纯龙,马海群. 基于神经网络的政府开放数据网站评价研究——以美国20个政府开放数据网站为例[J]. 现代情报,2016(9):16-21.
[21] 马海群,王今. 基于DEA的政府开放数据网站效率评价[J]. 数字图书馆论坛,2016(6):2-7.
[22] LOURENCO R P. Open government portals assessment:a transparency for accountability perspective[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013:62-74.
[23] YIU C. A right to data:fulfilling the promise of open public data in the UK[EB/OL].[2017-05-02].https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/a-right-to-data-mar-12.pdf.
[24] 郑磊,高丰. 中国开放政府数据平台研究:框架、现状与建议[J]. 电子政务,2015(7):8-16.
[25] LEE G, KWAK Y H. An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement[J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4):492-503.
[26] SOLAR M, CONCHA G, MEIJUEIRO L. A model to assess open government data in public agencies[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012:210-221.
[27] SANDOVAL-ALMAZAN R, GIL-GARCIA J R. Towards an evaluation model for open government:a preliminary proposal[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014:47-58.
[28] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M.Open data policies, their implementation and impact:a framework for comparison[J]. Government information quarterly. 2014, 31(1):17-29.
[29] 赵润娣. 国外开放政府数据政策:一个先导性研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2016(1):44-48.
[30] CHARALABIDIS Y, LOUKIS E, ALEXOPOULOS C. Evaluating second generation open government data infrastructures using value models[C]//201447th Hawaii international conference onsystem sciences. Washington:IEEE,2014:2114-2126.
[31] SUSHA I, ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M, et al. Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption usage, limitations, and lessons learned[J]. Social science computer review, 2015, 33(5):613-630.
[32] World Wide Web Foundation, The Governance Lab. Towards common methods for assessing open data:workshop report & draft framework[EB/OL].[2016-12-10]. http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Common%20Assessment%20Workshop%20Report.pdf.
[33] HJALMARSSON A, JOHANSSON N, RUDMARK D. Mind the gap:exploring stakeholders' value with open data assessment[C]//201548th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.Washington:IEEE, 2015:1314-1323.
[34] 杨孟辉,刘华. 开放政府数据评价方法研究[J]. 情报资料工作,2015(6):40-45.
[35] 夏义堃. 国际组织开放政府数据评估方法的比较与分析[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(19):75-83.
[36] 郑跃平,刘美岑. 开放数据评估的现状及存在问题——基于国外开放数据评估的对比和分析[J]. 电子政务,2016(8):84-93.
[37] 郑磊,关文雯. 开放政府数据评估框架、指标与方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2016,60(18):页码.
[38] Open Data Barometer[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/3rdEdition/ODB-3rdEdition-GlobalReport.pdf.
[39] Global Open Data Index[EB/OL].[2017-04-20].http://index.okfn.org/methodology/.
[40] Project Open Data Dashboard[EB/OL].[2017-04-18]. https://labs.data.gov/dashboard/offices/2016-02-29.
[41] United Nations e-government survey 2016[EB/OL].[2017-05-02].http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN96407.pdf.
[42] Open Data Institute[EB/OL].[2017-04-12].https://certificates.theodi.org/en/about.
[43] 2015中国开放政府数据"探显镜"[EB/OL].[2017-04-03]. http://www.haokoo.com/money/9277119.html
[44] 2017中国地方政府数据开放平台报告[EB/OL].[2017-06-01].http://www.useit.com.cn/thread-15470-1-1.html.
