[Purpose/significance] In the network environment, network academic information resources play a more important role in scientific research. This study will research scientific researchers' behavior characteristics and rationality, the selection and evaluation of academic information during their network academic information searching process, which will build the foundations for the further research of users' information behavior.[Method/process] The study used a personalized experimental design in different network academic information search task situations. The participants were required to think aloud. Then, the content of the experimental text was extracted and analyzed by the grounded theory method. The study compared and analyzed the judgment standard and influential factors of scientific research information users' network academic information searching process from different tasks by the content analysis results. It also discussed and analyzed academic information searching behavior's rationality and its root.[Result/conclusion] It is found that:the selection and evaluation of scientific researchers' network academic information searching are the comprehensive result of multi-dimensions and multi-factors, and there are generalities and differences; the task situation is the key condition variable in the process of building the users' mental model and constructing the meaning of the network academic information; in the network environment, the academic users' network information searching behavior and searching process have bounded rationality, and the task situation is the key driving factor of the bounded rational behavior.
Liu Bing
,
Lu Qingbi
. Experimental Study on Scientific Research Information Users' Bounded Rational Searching Behavior of Network Academic Information Resources from the Perspective of the Task Situation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(19)
: 32
-40
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.19.004
[1] 郝天侠. 网络免费学术资源利用探讨[J]. 西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(1):64-66.
[2] 张新勤. 网络学术资源利用中的信息损失研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2007.
[3] LI Y L. Exploring the relationship between work task and search task in information search[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(2):275-291.
[4] BROWN M E. A general model of information-seeking behavior[C]//Proceeding of the 54th ASIS annual meeting. Washington, DC:ASIS,1992:9-14.
[5] DERVIN B. Sense-making theory and practice:an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 1998, 2(12):625-632.
[6] DERVIN B. On studying information seeking methodologically:the implications of connecting metatheory to method[J]. Information processing and management, 1999, 35(6):727-750.
[7] MARKEY K. ATHERON P. ONTAP:online training and practice manual for ERIC database searchers[M]. Syracuse:Syracuse University, 1978.
[8] WANG P, HAWK W B, TENOPIR C. Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources:an exploratory study using a holistic approach[J]. Information processing & management, 2000, 36(2):229-251.
[9] CACIOPPO J T, PETTY R E, KAO C F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition[J]. Journal of personality assessment, 1984, 48(3):306.
[10] 甘利人, 高依旻. 科技用户信息搜索行为特点研究[J]. 情报学报, 2005, 24(1):26-33.
[11] RIEH S Y. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(2):145-161.
[12] 胡磊. 互联网学术信息可信性评价判据研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2012, 48(5):712-718.
[13] 胡磊. 互联网学术信息可信性研究[M]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2013:105.
[14] MAKRI S, WARWICK C. Information for inspiration:understanding architects' information seeking and use behaviors to inform design[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2010, 61(9):1745-1770.
[15] 陈伟. 科研情境下学术用户信息搜寻行为研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2012.
[16] 孙丽, 曹锦丹. 信息搜寻行为研究中任务概念框架的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(2):47-52.
[17] VAKKARI P. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process:a summary and generalization of a longitudinal study[J]. Journal of documentation, 2001,57(1):44-60.
[18] 李月琳, 胡玲玲. 基于环境与情境的信息搜寻与搜索[J]. 情报科学, 2012(1):110-114.
[19] PHARO N., JÄRVELIN K. The SST method:a tool for analyzing web information search process[J]. Information processing and management, 2004, 40(4):633-654.
[20] TALJA S. KESO H, PIETILÄINEN T. The production of "context" in information seeking researching:a meta-theoretical view[J]. Information processing and management, 1999, 35(6):751-763.
[21] 孙建军, 成颖. 基于信息检索交互模型的相关性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2005, 31(1):41-45.
[22] 王伟, 王沙骋. 基于扎根理论的科研人员信息查寻行为影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12):64-67.
[23] TOMS E. Task-based information searching and retrieval[M]//RUTHVER I, KELLY D. Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. London:Facet Publishing, 2011:43-59.
[24] LECKIE G J, PETTIGREW K E. Modeling the Information seeking of professionals:a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professions, and lawyers[J]. Library quality, 1996, 66(2):161-193.
[25] PAYNE J W, BETTMAN J R, JOHNSON E J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making[J]. Journal of experimental psychology:learning, memory, and cognition, 1998,14(3):534-552.
[26] VAKKARI P, PENNANEN M, SEROLA S. Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal-a longitudinal case study[J]. Information processing and management, 2003, 39(3):445-463.
[27] 丁韧. 网络信息搜索行为研究:以我国高校学生为例[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2013:23.
[28] SAVOLAINEN R. Expectancy-value beliefs and information needs as motivators for task-based information seeking[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(4):492-511.
[29] WILSON T D. Information needs and uses:fifty years of progress?[M]//VICKERY B C. Fifty years of progress:a journal of documentation review. London:Aslib, 1994:15-51.
