Analysis and Comparison of Four Evaluation Index Systems of Think Tanks' Influence

  • Luan Ruiying ,
  • Chu Jingli
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2017-07-20

  Revised date: 2017-09-04

  Online published: 2017-11-20

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper takes the evaluation index system of think tanks' influence as its research object, and compares domestic and foreign evaluation index systems of think tanks' influence to provide references for the construction of the influence evaluation system of new types of think tanks with Chinese characteristics.[Method/process] This paper adopted the comparison method and the case study method, compared and analyzed four evaluation index systems of think tanks' influence at home and abroad. It summarized their advantages and disadvantages, and analyzed their theoretical bases.[Result/conclusion] Each evaluation index system has its strength and weakness. It is necessary to construct the comprehensive influence evaluation system of new types of think tanks with Chinese characteristics by understanding the theories underlying the evaluation system and the features of different categories of think tanks.

Cite this article

Luan Ruiying , Chu Jingli . Analysis and Comparison of Four Evaluation Index Systems of Think Tanks' Influence[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(22) : 27 -35 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.22.004

References

[1] 《关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见》全文[EB/OL].[2017-06-27]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2015-01/21/c_133934292_2.htm.
[2] DICKSON P. Think tanks[M]. New York:Atheneum, 1971:1-3, 26-35.
[3] 里奇. 智库、公共政策和专家治策的政治学[M]. 潘羽辉,等译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2011:10, 78-91.
[4] 薛澜, 朱旭峰. "中国思想库":涵义、分类与研究展望[J]. 科学学研究, 2006(6):321-327.
[5] 朱旭峰.中国思想库:政策过程中的影响力研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2009:692.
[6] WEAVER R K. The changing world of think tanks[J]. Political science and politics, 1989(22):563-578.
[7] 金芳, 孙震海, 国峰,等. 西方学者论智库[M]. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2010:13-27, 89-93.
[8] TRIMBATH S. Think tanks:who's hot and who's not[J]. The international economy, 2000,14(5):10-47.
[9] STONE D. Capturing the political imagination:think tanks and the policy process[M]. London:Frank Cass, 2005:5-6.
[10] 埃布尔森.智库能发挥作用吗[M]. 扈喜林,译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2010:62-71.
[11] 孙志茹, 张志强. 思想库影响力测度方法综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010,54(12):78-81.
[12] 朱旭峰, 苏钰. 西方思想库对公共政策的影响力——基于社会结构的影响力分析框架构建[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2004(12):4-5, 21-26.
[13] 王桂侠, 万劲波, 赵兰香. 科技智库与影响对象的界面关系研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(12):50-55.
[14] 王桂侠, 万劲波. 科技智库影响力基本要素模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016,54(8):146-152.
[15] Global go to think tank index[EB/OL].[2017-07-03]. http://gotothinktank.com/index/.
[16] 2016 Global go to think tank index report[EB/OL].[2017-07-31]. http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12/.
[17] 2015中国智库报告[EB/OL].[2017-07-03]. http://www.sass.stc.sh.cn/eWebEditor/UploadFile/00n/ull/20160128161350250.pdf.
[18] GALTUNG J. A structural theory of imperialism[J]. Journal of peace research, 1971, 8(2):81-117.
[19] CTTI来源智库MRPA测评指标体系介绍(2015-2016)[EB/OL].[2017-08-23]. http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2016-12/21/nw.D110000gmrb_20161221_3-16.htm?div=-1.
[20] 2016中国智库大数据报告[EB/OL].[2017-07-02]. http://www.cadss.org.cn/index.php/storeroom/zjgd/561-2016.
[21] MILLS C W. The power elite[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1959:269-297.
[22] 古贝,林肯. 第四代评估[M]. 秦霖,蒋燕玲,等译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:24-43.
Outlines

/