[Purpose/significance]This paperanalyzed the background, policy, subject, content, service, access, technical supports based on re3data metadata entries. This research revealed the interdisciplinary differences in research data repositories and explored the landscape of the research data repositories in multiple dimensions.[Method/process] 14 metadata entries of the 1 848 research data repositories in the re3data database were selected to conduct a quantitative data analysis. Independent samples T-test was used to analyze the differences of the content, service, data access and upload among different disciplines.[Result/conclusion] Most of the research data repositories are funded by non-profit organizations. Most repositories are operated by institutions that are responsible in general, technical and funding terms. At present, the institutions are mainly from USA, European and international organizations. The majority of the registered repositories are disciplinary, Life sciences and natural sciences have the largest number of repositories. The data content types, service types, data openness and API of research data repositories have significant differences among different disciplines.
Wang Hui
,
Michael Witt
. Panoramic Analysis of Research Data Repositories Based on Re3data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(22)
: 69
-76
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.22.009
[1] PAMPEL H, DALLMEIER-TIESSEN S.Opening science:the evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research[M].Heidelberg:Springer, 2014:213-224.
[2] SIMONS N, RICHARDSON J. New content in digital repositories[M]. Oxford:Chandos publishing, 2013:11-28.
[3] Office of Science and Technology Policy. Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf.
[4] HM Government. Seizing the dataopportunity:a strategy for UK data capability[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254136/bis-13-1250-strategy-for-uk-data-capability-v4. pdf.
[5] 洪京一. 从G8开放数据宪章看国外开放政府数据的新进展[J]. 世界电信, 2014(S1):55-60.
[6] NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm.
[7] NSF data management plan requirements[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.
[8] Data management plans for NEH office of digital humanities proposals and awards[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.neh.gov/files/grants/data_management_plans_2014.pdf.
[9] RCUK common principles on data policy[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy/.
[10] Proposal preparation instructions. DFG form 54.01[EB/OL].[2017-04-16].http://www.dfg.de/formulare/54_01/54_01_en.pdf.
[11] Nature. Availability of data and materials[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.
[12] Policy on the management of research data and records[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://blogs.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/126/2014/01/Policy_on_the_Management_of_Research_Data_and_Records.Pdf.
[13] Research data management policy[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/about/policies-and-regulations/research-data-policy.
[14] Inter-university consortium for political and social research[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/landing.Jsp.
[15] UK data archive[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/.
[16] Data oberservation network for earth[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://www.dataone.org/.
[17] Dryad digital repository[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. http://datadryad.org/.
[18] 科学数据共享调研组.科学数据共享工程的总体框架[J]. 中国基础科学, 2003(1):65-70.
[19] 黎建辉,周园春,胡良霖,等.中国科学院科学数据云建设与服务[J]. 大数据, 2016(6):3-13.
[20] 朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(4):44-51.
[21] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等.社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015(1):74-79.
[22] 项英,赖剑菲,丁宁.高校图书馆科学数据管理服务实践探索——以武汉大学社会科学数据管理为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013(12):89-93.
[23] PAMPEL H, VIERKANT P, SCHOLZE F, et al. 呈现科研数据知识库:re3data. org注册机制[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(3):26-34.
[24] MARCIAL L H, HEMMINGER B M. Scientific data repositories on the Web:an initial survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(10):2029-2048.
[25] KINDLING M, PAMPEL H, VAN DE SANDT S, et al. The landscape of research data repositories in 2015:a re3data analysis[J/OL]. D-lib magazine, 2017, 23(3/4)[2017-06-27].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march17/kindling/03kindling.html.
[26] BOLGER L. ReShare:Re-shaping the landscape of research data repositories[EB/OL].[2017-04-16]. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/455421/iassist-reshare.Pdf.
[27] 邹丽雪,欧阳峥峥,王辉,等. 生命科学领域科研数据仓储特点及服务分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(7):59-66.
[28] 余文婷.开放科学数据仓储资源开发模式比较分析——以SRDA、eCrystals和Dryad为例[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2014(11):58-62,92.
[29] 黄永文,张建勇,黄金霞,等.国外开放科学数据研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013(5):21-27.
[30] 赵慧勤.网络信息资源组织——Dublin Core元数据[J]. 情报科学, 2001(4):439-442.
[31] 胡芳.国外典型科学数据仓储实施的元数据方案及启示[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(1):117-121.
[32] 杨波,胡立耘. 用于社会科学信息组织的元数据标准——DDI[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005(8):7-11.
[33] 鄂栋臣,马飞虎,孙翠羽. 中国极地测绘空间数据元数据管理系统的设计与实现[J]. 极地研究, 2006(1):39-45.
[34] 宋春桥,游松财,柯灵红. 面向发生的地学数据分类方案及其元数据扩展研究[J]. 地理信息世界, 2010(4):22-28.
[35] 王利松,陈彬,纪力强,等. 生物多样性信息学研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2010(5):429-443.
