[Purpose/significance] Taking University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(UESTC)Library as an example, this paper carries out case studies of the digital resource evaluation in the user data dimension in order to change the current digital resource evaluation status which stresses theories and pay little attention to practice. It also provides the thought and reference for academic libraries.[Method/process] According to the user data classification, digital resource evaluation methods of user information behavior data, user teaching research activity data and user social activity data were summarized. The data analysis process such as the evaluation purpose, the evaluation method and index, user data extraction, collation, analysis and conclusion was carried out. With library resources evaluation examples, the digital resource evaluation methods of user data including the horizontal comparison method, the vertical comparison method, the zero click-through rate analysis method, the synthetic evaluation method, the match method, the register analysis method, the citation analysis method and the subject librarian embedding method were systematically studied in this paper.[Result/conclusion] The digital resource evaluation in the user data dimension is more scientific and objective. The evaluation work in UESTC library takes user data research as the breakthrough point. They use different evaluation methods and construct different evaluation index systems for different user data, which makes the evaluation system efficient and operable. The methods and experience can provide useful reference for the digital resources evaluation in academic libraries.
Bi Yanfang
,
Li Taifeng
. Methods and Examples of the Digital Resource Evaluation in the User Data Dimension——Taking the Library of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(22)
: 82
-88
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.22.011
[1] 向远媛,温国强. 大学图书馆成效评估及其指标体系构建探索[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2011(3):11-16.
[2] MILLER R, SCHMIDT S. E-Metrics:measures for electronic resources[M]//SCHMEHL HINES S. Advances in library administration and organization. Bingley:Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2002, 203-212.
[3] 唐淑艳.大学图书馆电子资源绩效评价研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2008.
[4] 王琼,吴娱,吴英梅. 国外学术图书馆服务能力评价体系研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2009(2):85-90.
[5] 徐革. 我国大学图书馆电子资源绩效评价方法及其应用研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2002.
[6] 汤罡辉,程焕文. Wiley期刊库使用统计报告分析——以中山大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2007,51(4):136-138.
[7] 刘佳音.高校图书馆电子资源使用与用户检索行为统计分析——以ScienceDirect数据库为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2012(2):81-86.
[8] 李玉海. 基于读者行为数据的馆藏资源配置与利用评估模型[R]. 西安:中国图书馆学会高等学校图书馆分会,2014.
[9] 秦鸿. 决策支持视角下的数字资源使用统计分析实例研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2013(6):61-66.
[10] 罗文森. 常用中文电子资源访问日志功能分析及研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2011(2):93-95.
[11] 卞丽芳. 网络环境下文献荐购模式及其应用实证研究[J]. 图书馆论坛,2012,32(6):82-86.
[12] 金洁琴.高校数字资源采访馆员的素养和能力研究[J]. 图书馆学研究,2013(5):62-64.
[13] 刘磊,郭诗云,林小娟.基于社会网络理论的用户参与的图书馆数字资源建设研究述评[J]. 高校图书馆工作,2014,34(1):36-41.
[14] 张广钦. 图书馆评估概念与模型、发展史及方法研究述评[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2011(3):5-10.
[15] 曾照云,张永杰,杨兰芝. 数字资源服务绩效评估研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作,2008,52(8):54-57.
[16] 夏勍, 白似雪. 基于Web荐购的图书采访决策支持系统设计[J]. 图书馆学研究,2012(1):21-25.
[17] 王洁,黄晓琴. 基于层次分析与边际效益计算的高校图书馆中文图书荐购模型[J]. 情报理论与实践,2016,39(4):108-113.
[18] 刘佳音. 国内高校数字资源利用效能综合评价研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2013.
[19] 张宇娥,李泰峰,嵇灵. 协同创新"大科研"模式下学科服务嵌入路径研究-电子科技大学图书馆学科服务实践与创新[J]. 图书情报工作,2013,57(22):77-80.
[20] 邱葵.美国高校图书馆的学科馆员与学科服务[J]. 图书馆论坛,2016,36(12):13-23.