Survey and Analysis on Health Scientific Data Lifecycle Management in China

  • Yang Lin ,
  • Li Jiao ,
  • Yang Xiaolin ,
  • Wu Sizhu ,
  • Ma Hetong ,
  • Qian Qing
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020;
    2. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005

Received date: 2017-06-15

  Revised date: 2017-08-29

  Online published: 2017-11-20

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] For adapting to the requirements of national "13th Five-Year Plan" on sharing and efficient use of science and technology resources in the realm of health, this paper helps us understand the situation of health scientific data management in China, in order to better manage the data lifecycle.[Method/process] This paper selected representative data centers and special service platforms from the National Scientific Data Sharing Platform for Population and Health as survey objects. Investigated data were gathered based on the questionnaire and other methods. Then, the study analyzed the workflow of data management, the use of tools and the construction of systems.[Result/conclusion] We can strengthen the health scientific data lifecycle management from the following aspects:increasing the awareness of data lifecycle management, enhancing the technical ability of data management, paying attention to the construction of the data management team.

Cite this article

Yang Lin , Li Jiao , Yang Xiaolin , Wu Sizhu , Ma Hetong , Qian Qing . Survey and Analysis on Health Scientific Data Lifecycle Management in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017 , 61(22) : 117 -126 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.22.015

References

[1] 关于印发《"十三五"卫生与健康科技创新专项规划》的通知[EB/OL].[2017-06-14].http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201706/t20170613_133484.htm.
[2] BOULTON R, CAMPBELL P, COLLINS B, et al. Science as an open enterprise[R]. London:Royal Society, 2012.
[3] Science 2.0 consultation:royal society response[EB/OL].[2017-06-14].https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2014/science-2-0-consultation-response-290914.pdf.
[4] 叶玉江. 加强科技平台工作推进科技资源管理[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2015(2):1-6.
[5] GARMIRE L X, GLISKE S, NGUYEN Q C, et al. The training of next generation data scientists in biomedicine.[C]//ALMAN B R, DUNKER K A, HUNTER L. Pacific symposium on biocomputing 2017.Singapore:World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2017:640-645.
[6] 司莉, 邢文明. 科学数据管理与共享的理论与实践[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2017:51-84.
[7] 胡永生, 刘颖. 基于用户调查的高校科学数据管理需求分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(6):28-32.
[8] 宋海艳, 邵承瑾, 顾立平,等. 我国科研人员对机构知识库认知与使用的现状调查与分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(2):8-16.
[9] 姚晓霞, 聂华, 顾立平,等. 我国教育科研机构知识库建设现状调查与分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(5):1-9.
[10] 邢文明, 吴方枝, 司莉. 高校图书馆开展科研数据管理与共享服务调查分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2013, 33(6):19-25.
[11] 黄如花, 王春迎. 英美政府数据开放平台数据管理功能的调查与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(19):24-30.
[12] 赵莉娜, 徐春艳. 国内外机构知识库建设情况调查研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2011(12):38-43.
[13] 李姣, 郭海红, 郭珉江,等. 美英政府开放健康医疗数据的主题分布与开放程度量化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(20):132-137.
[14] LI H, NI M, WANG P, et al. A survey of the current situation of clinical biobanks in China[J]. Biopreservation and biobanking, 2017, 15(3):248-252.
[15] 葛爱华, 魏永越, 李瑛,等. 大型流行病学调查资料的数据管理和质量控制[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2011(4):544-548.
[16] HIRSCHMAN L, BURNS G A, KRALLINGER M, et al. Text mining for the biocuration workflow[J]. Database, 2012, 2012(4):3446-3456.
[17] Data life cycle models and concepts CEOS version 1.2[EB/OL].[2017-06-14].https://my.usgs.gov/confluence/download/attachments/82935852/Data%20Lifecycle%20Models%20and%20Concepts%20v13.docx?api=v2.
[18] DCC curation lifecycle model[EB/OL].[2017-08-26].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model.
[19] UK·data archive research data lifecycle[EB/OL].[2017-08-14].http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/create-manage/life-cycle.
[20] Why use DDI[EB/OL].[2017-06-14].http://www.ddialliance.org/training/why-use-ddi.
[21] 杨林, 钱庆, 吴思竹. 科学数据管理生命周期模型比较[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2016, 25(11):1-6.
[22] JOHNSTON L. A workflow model for curating research data in the University of Minnesota Libraries:report from the 2013 Data Curation Pilot[R]. Minneapolis:University Digital of Minnesota Conservancy, 2014.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉