Study on the Acquisition Decision Assessment of Electronic Resources: A Case Study of the Group Purchasing of the National Science Library of CAS

  • Luo Qishan ,
  • Zhai Shuang ,
  • Zhang Jing
Expand
  • National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2017-09-04

  Revised date: 2017-12-04

  Online published: 2018-02-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]Taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquisition work into consideration, this paper establishes a framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment and builds the application guidelines for its use in order to provide support for making a scientific and reasonable acquisition decision. [Method/process]Based on the theory and experience of the acquisition decision assessment of electronic resources carried out by the main information institutions, taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquired by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Consortium for instance,this paper analyzed the assessment principles, assessment concepts and indicators. [Result/conclusion]This paper establishes the framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment which contains five assessment concepts and eighteen indicators, and builds the application guidelines-demand first, quality guarantee, cost optimization and overall consideration. It also puts forward three application models which are the vertical comparison, horizontal comparison and sorting comparison.

Cite this article

Luo Qishan , Zhai Shuang , Zhang Jing . Study on the Acquisition Decision Assessment of Electronic Resources: A Case Study of the Group Purchasing of the National Science Library of CAS[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(3) : 39 -44 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.03.005

References

[1] 中国科学院知识资源组织与服务的新需求、新模式、新思路暨第八届电子资源培训[EB/OL]. [2017-04-18]. http://etraining2017.csp.escience.cn/.
[2] CONCERT台湾学术电子资讯资源共享联盟[EB/OL]. [2017-04-25]. http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/page/index_1.
[3] 香港大学图书馆[EB/OL]. [2017-04-25]. http://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/erp.html#Sect3a.
[4] The Center of Research Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-17]. https://www.crl.edu/collections/cooperative-collection-building.
[5] FOX D, LAM V T. Canadian National Site Licensing Project[J]. The serials librarian, 2003,43(3): 39-57.
[6] University of Maryland Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-18]. https://www.lib.umd.edu/collections/policies/electronic-resources.
[7] FAU Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-10]. http://www.library.fau.edu/policies/cd_e-resources.htm.
[8] 高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟(DRAA)[EB/OL]. [2017-05-06]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/Spage/view.action?pagecode=pjzxjs.
[9] Über nationale Lizenzen[EB/OL]. [2017-05-10]. http://www.nationallizenzen.de/ueber-nationallizenzen.
[10] 肖珑, 李浩凌, 徐成. CALIS数字资源评估指标体系及其应用指南[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2008(3):2-8,17.
[11] 汤罡辉.国际学术期刊库绩效评价方法应用现状[J]. 图书馆建设,2011(3):5-10.
[12] 吕旭霞.电子资源利用绩效评估指标体系的构建[J]. 图书馆学研究,2009(12):51-53,31.
Outlines

/

〈 〉