[Purpose/significance]This paper aims to study how to find the relative paper from large numbers of papers and study on the topic innovation of the paper. It may help researcher to read and use those papers. [Method/process]First, the paper defined the concept of the topic innovation and the self-citation network. And then the paper brought out the research idea, the tools and the method. At last the paper studied the Indiana University's innovation in the library and information science. [Result/conclusion]The result shows that the main path method can help to find these papers according to citation relationship from the self-citation network and analyze the topic innovation based on the result.
Wei Ruibin
. Empirical Research on the Topic Innovation of the Paper Based on Self-citation Network and Main Path Analysis[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(3)
: 64
-70
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.03.008
[1] 韩宇,赵学文,李正风.基础研究创新概念辨析及对相关问题的思考[J].中国基础科学,2001(3):35-40.
[2] 胡英奎,罗敏,王秀玲.学术期刊编辑初审论文创新性的方法[J].编辑学报,2012(4):353-355.
[3] 盛杰.期刊编辑对科技论文创新性的把握[J].编辑学报,2011(3):215-217.
[4] 朱大明.科技期刊论文创新性鉴审的四个基本要素[J].科技管理研究,2011(9):199-201.
[5] 曹妍,朱瑞芳,韩世范.应用德尔菲法构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系[J].护理研究,2017(17):2101-2103.
[6] AMJAD T, DING Y, DAUD A, et al. Topic-based heterogeneous rank[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1):1-22.
[7] HELLSTEN I, LAMBIOTTE R, SCHARNHORST A, et al. Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: a new approach to scientists’ field mobility?[J].Scientometrics,2007,72(3):469-486.
[8] LEE J Y. Exploring a researcher’s personal research history through self-citation network and citation identity[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,2012,29(1):157-174.
[9] 魏瑞斌.基于自引网络和内容分析的学者研究主题挖掘[J].情报学报,2015,34(6):635-645.
[10] HUMMON N, DEREIAN P. Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory [J].Social networks, 1989, 11(1):39-63.
[11] GOFFMAN W. Mathematical approach to the spread of scientific ideas++the history of mast cell research[J]. Nature, 1966, 212(5061):449-452.
[12] JAHN M. Changes with growth of the scientific literature of two biomedical specialties[D].Philadephia: Drexel University, 1972.
[13] 诺伊,巴塔盖尔吉.蜘蛛:社会网络分析技术[M]. 林枫,译.北京:世界图书出版公司,2012:328-331.
[14] 韩毅,金碧辉.基于连通性的引文网络结构分析新视角:主路径分析[J].科学学研究,2012(11):1634-1640.
[15] 隗玲,方曙.引文网络主路径研究进展评述及展望[J].情报理论与实践,2016(9):128-133.
[16] 宋歌.学术创新的扩散过程研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(1):62-75.
[17] 韩毅,童迎,夏慧.领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(3):11-16.
[18] 祝清松,冷伏海.基于引文主路径文献共被引的主题演化分析[J].情报学报,2014,33(5):498-506.
[19] DENNIS A R, WIXOM B H, VANDENBERG R J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001, 25(2):167-193.
[20] BROWN S A. Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2010, 27(2):9-54.
[21] DENNIS A R, FULLER R M, VALACICH J S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity[J]. MIS quarterly, 2008, 32(3):575-600.
[22] CRONIN B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis[J]. Journal of information science, 2001, 27(1):1-7.
[23] CRONIN B, SHAW D. Banking on different forms of symbolic capital[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2010, 53(14):1267-1270.
[24] VAUGHAN L, SHAW D. Web citation data for impact assessment: a comparison of four science disciplines[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2005, 56(10):1075-1087.
[25] 邱均平,余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):5-12.
[26] LARIVIERE V, GINGRAS Y, SUGIMOTO C R, et al. Team size matters: collaboration and scientific impact since 1900[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2015,66(7):1323-1332.
[27] PRATT J A, HAUSER K, SUGIMOTO C R. Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2012,93(2):279-304.
[28] SUGIMOTO C R, CRONIN B. Biobibliometric profiling: an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014,63(3):450-468.
[29] SUGIMOTO C R, SUGIMOTO T J, TSOU A, et al. Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: a study of social sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,109(2):997-1016.
[30] CRONIN B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis[J]. Journal of information science,2001,27(1):1-7.
