Empirical Analysis on Literature Guarantee of the 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center at Universities: A Case Study of Wuhan University

  • Ai Nanzhu ,
  • Wang Xincai
Expand
  • 1. Center for the Studies of Information Resources of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2. Wuhan University Library, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2017-10-09

  Revised date: 2017-12-04

  Online published: 2018-03-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] By investigating the situation of university libraries' literature guarantee to the 2011 Collaborative Innovation Centers, this paper provides some suggestions to improve the libraries' guarantee work, which can be benefit for the development of Collaborative Innovation Centers. [Method/process] Taking Wuhan University as an example, we counted the citation information of Chinese journal articles published by the three 2011 Collaborative Innovation Centers, which are initiated or built by Wuhan University. Then, we generalized the citations' characteristics though data analysis, and compared the citations with Wuhan University library's collection resources. Finally, based on the above work, we figured out the literature guarantee situation of Wuhan University library for those three centers. [Result/conclusion] In order to improve the effectiveness of literature guarantee for Collaborative Innovation Center, university libraries should explore collaborative guarantee mechanism, value the construction of special resources, enhance the discoverability of libraries' collection resources, and take use of open access resources and so on.

Cite this article

Ai Nanzhu , Wang Xincai . Empirical Analysis on Literature Guarantee of the 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center at Universities: A Case Study of Wuhan University[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(5) : 15 -22 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.002

References

[1] 教育部. 普通高等学校图书馆规程[EB/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_736/s3886/201601/t20160120_228487.html.
[2] 教育部. 教育部财政部关于实施高等学校创新能力提升计划的意见[EB/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6578/201408/xxgk_172765.html.
[3] 王会丽. "2011计划"对高校图书馆协同创新的影响分析[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2013(9):32-35.
[4] 张秀. 复杂系统视角下面向多学科协同创新的高校数字图书资源共享服务研究[J]. 图书馆学研究,2013(18):20-23.
[5] 程波,张玲. 协同创新中心的服务需求分析[J]. 图书馆学研究,2014(3):77-79,101.
[6] 谢姝琳. 协同创新背景下地方高校图书馆服务匹配及实证分析[J]. 农业图书情报学刊,2016,28(02):25-28.
[7] 中国南海协同创新中心. 特色数据库[EB/OL].[2017-12-01].https://nanhai.nju.edu.cn/5809/list.htm.
[8] 梁春慧. 基于"图书馆-环境-用户"三螺旋理论的图书馆服务——以面向协同创新中心的专利信息服务为例[J]. 新世纪图书馆,2015(4):31-34.
[9] 邱均平. 信息计量学(九)第九讲文献信息引证规律和引文分析法[J]. 情报理论与实践,2001(3):236-240.
[10] NISONGER T E. A Test of Two Citation Checking Techniques for Evaluating Political Science Collections in University Libraries[J]. Library resources & technical services, 1982, 27(2):163-176.
[11] HEIDENWOLF T. Evaluating an interdisciplinary research collection[J]. Collection Management, 1994, 18(3-4):33-48.
[12] CHING J T Y, CHENNUPATI K R. Collection evaluation through citation analysis techniques:A case study of the Ministry of Education, Singapore[J]. Library Review, 2002, 51(8):398-405.
[13] LEIDING R. Using citation checking of undergraduate honors thesis bibliographies to evaluate library collections[J]. College & Research Libraries, 2005, 66(5):417-429.
[14] 马建华. 引文分析在图书馆文献采集中的作用——北京大学有机化学专业博士论文的文献计量研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2003(3):70-73.
[15] 李峰. 使用引文分析法考察图书馆文献保障情况[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2011(5):104-108.
[16] 张桂清. 汕头大学研究生学位论文引文分析与研究[J]. 大学图书情报学刊,2005(2):84-86.
[17] 王惠翔,高凡. 我国情报学主要期刊引文定量分析[J]. 图书馆,2004(1):66-68.
[18] 刘晓霞. 基于引文分析的核心书目测定研究[J]. 图书馆建设,2013(9):47-50,57.
[19] 王新才,王海宁. 高校图书馆期刊文献保障实证研究——以武汉大学为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2015(5):4-15.
[20] 钟建法. 高校人文社科外文图书保障体系建设存在的问题与对策[J]. 图书情报工作,2010,54(11):10-13.
[21] CHESBROUGH H, VANHAVERBEKE W, WEST J. Open innovation:Researching a new paradigm[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2006.
[22] 周和玉. 高校图书馆特种文献的收藏与管理[J]. 图书情报知识,1991(4):41-42.
[23] 欧阳剑. 数字图书馆信息资源的可发现性研究[J]. 图书馆论坛,2013(1):32-37.
[24] 黄如花. 利用开放存取资源提升馆藏质量[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2008(5):26-32.
Outlines

/