[Purpose/significance] China's boundary and ocean study is typically problem-oriented interdisciplinary study. This paper aims to summarize the characteristics of literature demand and discuss interdisciplinary literature guarantee strategy of boundary and ocean studies. [Method/process] Using citation analysis and interview method, the paper analyzes the citations document types, disciplines, languages and cited year intervals of all papers of Wuhan University China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies (CIBOS) from 2007, and the results of subjective literature demand of researchers. [Result/conclusion] The literature demand of China's boundary and ocean studies is more complex and diverse on overall. Researchers have high reliance on journals, books and network resources. There are long time spans in journals and books whose political science and legal characteristics are prominent. Besides, Chinese and English literatures account for nearly 90%. Therefore, the library should focus on users' literature demands, pay attention to the construction of special resources, refine the literature resources construction strategy, and optimize its discipline services.
Fan Huiting
,
Xie Xin
. Research on Interdisciplinary Literature Demand and Guarantee Strategy: A Case Study of China's Boundary and Ocean Studies[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(5)
: 23
-29
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.003
[1] STOPAR K, DROBNE D, ELER K, et al. Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology:identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2):563-581.
[2] HAMMARFELT B. Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies:citation analysis of highly cited monographs[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3):705-725.
[3] 国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心. 中心介绍[EB/OL].[2017-06-16]. http://cictsmr.whu.edu.cn/index.php?id=1471.
[4] 马凌云, 王宗亮. 高校教师文献需求及图书馆馆藏保障情况实证分析——以上海师范大学数学学科为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2012(1):42-47.
[5] ABEYRATHNE D K. Citation analysis of dissertations for collection development[J]. Collection building, 2015, 34(2):30-40.
[6] 王海宁. 中国边界与海洋研究院文献保障研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2016.
[7] 孙辉. 基于引文分析的当代中国史学科文献需求与特色资源建设研究[J]. 情报探索, 2016, 1(9):1-6.
[8] 莫建华. 基于引文分析的科研人员文献需求透视——以浙江工业大学人文社科省级重点学科为例[J]. 情报探索, 2013(11):31-33.
[9] 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3):108-117.
[10] 钓鱼岛主权属于中国的历史依据[EB/OL].[2017-11-30]. http://www.diaoyudao.org.cn/node_7217572.htm.
[11] 刘艳苏, 桂秀梅. 二八定律与长尾理论在现代图书馆的共生应用[J]. 现代情报, 2009, 29(8):40-42.
[12] 李祖超, 梁春晓. 协同创新运行机制探析——基于高校创新主体的视角[J]. 中国高教研究, 2012(7):81-84.
[13] 崔琼. 武汉大学引进文科图书中心书库文献保障策略[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2007, 25(6):36-38.
[14] 李力. 国外研究型图书馆学科服务的发展态势及启示——以康奈尔大学为例[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2013(14):82-85.
[15] BIDDISCOMBE R. Learning support professionals:the changing role of subject specialists in UK academic libraries[J]. Program, 2002, 36(4):228-235.
