[Purpose/significance] With the rapid development of information technology, the trend of cross-integration between disciplines isbecoming more and more obvious. It is of great significance to explore the interdisciplinary knowledge exchange activities and clear the structure of disciplines. This paper takes the library and information science(LIS) as an example to observe the inflow and outflow of knowledge, including the disciplines and directions of knowledge inflow and outflow.[Method/process] We selected twelve core journals in the field of LIS as the data sources, anddivided the disciplines according to CNKI's discipline classification. Finally, we used Gephi(a visualization software tool),to explore the intercross between LIS and other disciplines from the perspective of reference and citation. [Result/conclusion] This paper reveals that:LIS is closely related to the disciplines of computer science, basic science synthesis,economic managementand so on, and the disciplinary structure tends to be stable; the total reference volume of LIS is far less than that of citation; the self-citing rate of LIS has been declining year by year, and the exchangeof LIS with external disciplines is frequent.
Yang Ruixian
,
Jiang Xiaohan
. The Knowledge Structure and Evolution of Interdisciplinary Subjects from the Citation Perspective of Discipline and Journals: A Case Study of Library and Information Science[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(5)
: 30
-39
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.004
[1] WHITEHOWARD D, MCCAIN KW.Visualizing a discipline:an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1998,49(4):327-355.
[2] LEYDESDORFF L. Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(5):601-613.
[3] AGARWAL R.On the intellectual structure and evolution of ISR[J].Information systems research,2016,27(3):471-477.
[4] DOREIAN P.Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1985,36(6):411-417.
[5] COCCIA M, BOZEMAN B.Allometricmodels to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration[J]. Scientometrics,2016,108(3):1065-1084.
[6] LEYDESDORFF L.Betweennesscentrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(9):1303-1309.
[7] BOYACK K W,KLAVANS R,BÖRNER K. Mapping the backbone of science[J]. Scientometrics,2005,64(3):351-374.
[8] MARTI'NEZ M A, COBO M J, HERRERA M, et al.Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping[J]. Research on social work practice,2014,25(2):257-277.
[9] 汪雅喜.基于共词网络的学科主题结构与演化研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2013.
[10] 马瑞敏,倪超群.作者耦合分析:一种新学科知识结构发现方法的探索性研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(3):4-11.
[11] 宋歌,叶继元.基于SNA的图书情报学期刊互引网络结构分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2009,35(3):27-34.
[12] 周秋菊,杨立英,岳婷,等.基于期刊同被引和互引网络的学科结构和知识流动研究[J].情报杂志,2014,33(8):84-91.
[13] 曾倩,杨思洛. 国内外图书情报学科知识交流的比较研究——以期刊引证分析为视角[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013,10(36):114-119,108.
[14] 孟祥保.图书情报学交叉融合与发展——基于国外35种核心期刊的引文分析[J]. 图书情报知识,2012,149(5):50-58.
[15] 侯海燕,赵楠楠,胡志刚,等.国际知识产权研究的学科交叉特征分析——基于期刊学科分类的视角[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(3):416-426.
[16] 王连喜,曹树金.学科交叉视角下的网络舆情研究主题比较分析——以国内图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J].情报学报,2017,36(2):159-169.
[17] 柯青,朱婷婷.图书情报学跨学科期刊引用及知识贡献推进效应[J].情报资料工作,2017(2):12-21.
[18] 邱均平.文献计量学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1988:289.
[19] 邓君,马晓君,毕强.社会网络分析工具Ucinet和Gephi的比较研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2014,37(8):133-138.
[20] 关迎晖,向勇,陈康.基于Gephi的可视分析方法研究与应用[J].电信科学,2013(S1):112-119.
[21] 张建修.浅议新时期档案工作的基本属性[J].办公自动化,2009(2):19-21.
[22] 杨良斌.科学计量学理论与实例[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2014(5):97-99.
