The Driving Factors,Advantages and Obstacles of the Open Science Development

  • Chen Xiujuan ,
  • Zhang Zhiqiang
Expand
  • 1. Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2017-09-26

  Revised date: 2017-11-14

  Online published: 2018-03-20

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]Under the environment of new technology, open science has got more and more attention, and the focus on international development of open science can provide support and reference for the promotion of open science in China.[Method/process]Through the internet survey and literature research, this paper reviews the open science and introduces the meaning of open science and the current driving factors, advantages and obstacles of the open science development.[Result/conclusion]The concept of open science presents multiformity and the scientific development needs, open science policy and practice projects of different institutions and countries are the main driving factors for the development of open science. The advantages of open science are gradually highlighted, such as increasing the speed and efficiency of scientific research, promoting the discovery of new problems, enhancing visibility and scope for engagement, promoting academic rigor and scientific research quality and enhancing collaboration and community-building. Besides the advantages, there are some factors hindering its development, such as lack of academicrewards and other incentives, culture of independent research and competitiveness, lack of knowledge, skills, intellectual property rights and other legal protection for open science.

Cite this article

Chen Xiujuan , Zhang Zhiqiang . The Driving Factors,Advantages and Obstacles of the Open Science Development[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(6) : 77 -84 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.06.010

References

[1] DAVID P A.Common agency contracting and the emergence of open science institutions[J].American economic review, 1998, 88(2):15-21.
[2] MERTON R K. The sociology of science:theoretical and empirical investigations[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1973.
[3] POLANYI M. The republic of science:its political and economic theory[J]. Minerva, 2000, 38(1):1-21.
[4] POPPER K. The logic of scientific discovery[M].London, New York:Routledge, 2005.
[5] 唐义,肖希明.开放科学发展历程及存在的问题与对策[J].情报资料工作, 2013(5):20-24.
[6] 顾立平.开放科学中的学术交流研究综述[J].知识管理论坛, 2013(2):9-15.
[7] 武学超.开放科学的内涵、特质及发展模式[J].科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(20):7-12.
[8] 赵艳枝,龚晓林.从开放获取到开放科学:概念、关系、壁垒及对策[J].图书馆学研究, 2016(5):2-6.
[9] 张学文.面向创新型国家的开放科学技术政策——理论内涵及建构逻辑与社会效应[J].科学学研究, 2013, 31(10):1488-1494.
[10] MBABAALI M. Open science and academic libraries[C/OL].[2017-07-25].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304624519_Open_Science_and_Academic_Libraries.
[11] Open science[EB/OL].[2017-06-25].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science.
[12] Open science[EB/OL].[2017-07-25]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/open-science.
[13] Directorate-general for research and innovation (European Commission). Open innovation, open science, open to the world[M].Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union, 2016.
[14] OECD. Making open science a reality[R].Paris:OECD Publishing, 2015.
[15] What is open science?[EB/OL].[2017-07-01].http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2010/09/13/what-is-open-science/.
[16] BARTLING S, FRIESIKE S. Opening science:the evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing[M]. Cham:Springer, 2014.
[17] PICARRA M. Discussion paper:researchers and open science[J/OL].[2017-07-25].http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51858.
[18] BURGELMAN J C, OSIMO D, BOGDANOWICZ M. Science 2.0(change will happen…)[J]. First monday, 2010, 15(7):1-18.
[19] LIBER statement on enabling open science[EB/OL].[2017-07-01]. http://libereurope.eu/blog/2014/09/30/liber-statement-on-enabling-open-science/.
[20] Open science and research initiative[EB/OL].[2017-07-01]. http://openscience.fi/about.
[21] The open science and research roadmap 2014-2017[EB/OL].[2017-07-01]. http://openscience.fi/open-science-and-research-roadmap-2014-2017.
[22] Amsterdam call for action on open science[EB/OL].[2017-07-01]. https://wiki.surfnet.nl/display/OSCFA/Amsterdam+Call+for+Action+on+Open+Science.
[23] National plan open science[EB/OL].[2017-07-01]. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:9e9fa82e-06c1-4d0d-9e20-5620259a6c65?collection=research.
[24] FOSTER[EB/OL].[2017-07-10]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/project.
[25] PONTIKA N, KNOTH P, CANCELLIERI M, et al. Fostering open science to research using a taxonomy and an eLearning portal[C]//International conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business.New York:ACM, 2015:11.
[26] Open science monitor[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=home§ion=monitor.
[27] Explore the indicators related to open scholarly communication[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=scholarlycomm§ion=monitor.
[28] Journal policies on open peer review[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=scholarlycomm§ion=monitor#viz1489074460155.
[29] European open science cloud[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-cloud.
Outlines

/

〈 〉