Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 7: 5 - 11

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.07.001

An Evaluation Framework of Think Tanks Influence from the Information Transmission Perspective

  • Wang Xin
Expand
  • 1. College of Crime Investigation and Counter terrorism, Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100038;
    2. Public Security Intelligence Rearch Center, Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100038

Received date: 2017-11-20

  Revised date: 2018-01-21

  Online published: 2018-04-05

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Information is the carrier of influence transmission, compared with the fuzziness and concealment of influence, the process of information transmission is more clear and visible. Therefore, according to the framework of influence transmission between think tanks and governments, this paper proposes an evaluation framework of think tanks influence. [Method/process] After analyzing the key steps of influence transmission between think tanks and governments, this paper developed a framework of influence transmission. Then, though structured interviews with some cadres that from related departments of Chinese ministry, it enriched the framework's information transmission details. [Result/conclusion] System constraints have great effects on the capacities of communication link and information demand matching. The public communication capacity of think tank has greater influence on the adjustment capacity of information filtering. Data collection capacity, scientific and objective data analysis capacity and expert insight constitute the capacities of think tanks to collect and produce information.

Key words： evaluation of think tank; government decision consulting; think tank influence; information communication

Cite this article

Wang Xin . An Evaluation Framework of Think Tanks Influence from the Information Transmission Perspective[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(7) : 5 -11 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.07.001

References

[1] 陈媛媛,李刚,关琳. 中外智库影响力评价研究述评[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015,137(4):35-45.
[2] 傅广宛,张凌. 政府决策咨询机构:重复建设与治理对策[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2016(2):51-57.
[3] 任晓. 第五种权力——美国思想库的成长、功能与运作机制[J]. 现代国际关系,2000(7):18-22, 48.
[4] 帕瑞克·克勒纳,韩万渠. 智库概念界定和评价排名:亟待探求的命题[J]. 中国行政管理, 2014,(5):25-28, 33.
[5] 戴安娜·斯通,唐磊. 政策分析机构的三大神话——回收箱、垃圾桶还是智库?[J]. 国外社会科学, 2014(3):4-16.
[6] RICH A. Think Tanks,Public Policy,and the Politics of Expertise[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2004:152.
[7] 朱旭峰.中国思想库——政策过程中的影响力研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2009:22-23.
[8] 王丽莉. 旋转门:美国思想库研究[M]. 北京:国家行政学院出版社, 2010.
[9] 朱旭峰. 智库影响力测量的多维性[N/OL]. 学习时报, 2017-04-10(006).
[10] 朱旭峰,苏钰. 西方思想库对公共政策的影响力——基于社会结构的影响力分析框架构建[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2004,(12):4-5, 21-26.
[11] 上海社会科学院智库研究中心项目组,李凌. 中国智库影响力的实证研究与政策建议[J]. 社会科学, 2014(4):4-21.
[12] 傅广宛. 政府决策咨询机构的"中国特色"内涵研究——以中西方比较为研究视角[J]. 中国行政管理, 2010(12):57-60.
[13] 李超平,戴言. 政务信息传递及其控制[J]. 情报资料工作, 2001(1):21-23.
[14] 夏义堃. 非对称信息环境下政府决策行为分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005(6):840-844.
[15] 朱旭峰. 构建中国特色新型智库研究的理论框架[J]. 中国行政管理, 2014(5):29-33.
[16] 苗绿. 中国社会智库的政策影响机制分析——以中国与全球化智库(CCG)推动国际人才相关政策为例[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2016, 1(5):75-81.
[17] 朱旭峰. 中国社会政策变迁中的专家参与模式研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2011(2):1-27, 243.
[18] 唐磊. 中国民间智库30年的初步考察[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2016(4):99-112, 129.
[19] 朱旭峰,王倩茹. 政府决策者能力与专家咨询选择:基于天津市政府官员的实证研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2010(4):47-67, 203.
[20] 丁炫凯,徐致远. 我国互联网企业智库成果量化分析——以百度、阿里巴巴、腾讯(BAT)为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016(5):17-24.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.