User Roles and Behaviors in Learning Groups' Online Knowledge Collaboration

  • Wang Zhe ,
  • Zhang Pengyi
Expand
  • Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2017-09-28

  Revised date: 2018-01-09

  Online published: 2018-04-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explore user roles and behaviors in the learning groups' online knowledge collaboration and their collaborative features and distributions. This study will help people better understand behavioral features and distributions of collaborative user roles in the learning groups' collaboration. It will also help information service providers to provide more useful information to different users.[Method/process] By the methods of social network analysis (SNA) and cluster analysis, we collected 1096 collaborative log edits from an online course collaboration platform and analyzed them. [Result/conclusion] In learning groups' online knowledge collaboration, leaders play a significant leading role,substantial content providers focus on providing contentand have little communications with other users despite some micro-collaboration among themselves. Maintainer corrects the editing vulnerabilities and misbehavior of other roles in the collaboration, and also maintain close relationships with key users in the group. The contribution of social connectors is not quite obvious in learning groups.

Cite this article

Wang Zhe , Zhang Pengyi . User Roles and Behaviors in Learning Groups' Online Knowledge Collaboration[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(7) : 77 -87 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.07.009

References

[1] FARAJ S, JARVENPAA S, MAJCHRZAK A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities[J]. Organization science, 2011, 22(5):1224-1239.
[2] BENBUNAN-FICH R, ARBAUGH J. Separating the effects of knowledge construction and group collaboration in learning outcomes of web-based courses[J]. Information & management, 2006, 43(6):778-793.
[3] ROVAI A. Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks[J]. Internet & higher education, 2002, 5(4):319-332.
[4] MEANS B, TOYAMA Y, MURPHYR, et al. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning:a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies[EB/OL].[2018-02-09] https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824.
[5] RAITMAN R, AUGAR N, ZHOU W. Employing wikis for online collaboration in the e-learning environment:case study[C]//International conference on information technology and applications. Washington, DC:IEEE, 2005:142-146.
[6] 李瑞, 刘金龙, 尹俊文. Wiki在教学中的协作学习与教学管理作用[J]. 人力资源管理, 2012(5):163-163.
[7] MURRAY F, O'MAHONY S. Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation:implications for organization science[J]. Organization science, 2007, 18(6):1006-1021.
[8] GLEAVE E, WELSER H, Lento T, et al. A conceptual and operational definition of ‘social role’ in online community[C]//Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Washington,DC:IEEE, 2009:1-11.
[9] KIM A. Community building on the web:secret strategies for successful online communities[M].Berkeley:Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, 2000.
[10] KOZINETS R. E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption[J]. European management journal, 1999, 17(3):252-264.
[11] WELSER H, COSLEY D, KOSSINETS G, et al. Finding social roles in Wikipedia[C]//I-conference. New York:ACM, 2011:122-129.
[12] GAZAN R. Seekers, sloths and social reference:homework questions submitted to a question-answering community[J]. New review of hypermedia and multimedia, 2007, 13(2):239-248.
[13] GAZAN R. Social annotations in digital library collections[J/OL]. D-lib magazine, 2008, 14(11/12).[2018-02-09].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/gazan/11gazan.html.
[14] PREECE J. Online communities:designing usability, supporting sociability[M]. New York:Wiley,2000.
[15] PREECE J, MALONEY-KRICHMAR D,ABRAS C. History of online communities[M]//CHRISTENSENK, LEVINSON D. Encyclopedia of community:from village to virtual world. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, 2003:1023-1027.
[16] TURNERT, SMITH M, Fisher D, et al. Picturing Usenet:mapping computer-mediated collective action[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2005, 10(4):JCMC1048.
[17] WELSER H, GLEAVE E, FISHER D, et al. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups[J]. Journal of social structure, 2007, 8(2):1-31.
[18] DE WEVER B, KEER H, SCHELLENS T, et al. Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups:the differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2010, 26(4):516-523.
[19] HAYTHORNTHWAITE C, HAGAR C. The social worlds of the web[J]. Annual review of information science & technology, 2005, 39(1):311-346.
[20] FULLER J,JAWECKI G,MUHLBACHER H. Innovation creation by online basketballcommunities[J]. Journal of business research, 2007, 60(1):60-71.
[21] KOCH S, SCHNEIDER G. Effort, cooperation, and coordination in an open source software project[J]. Information systems journal, 2002, 12(1):27-42.
[22] NONNECKE B, PREECE J. Lurker demographics:counting the silent[C]//CHI 2000 conference on human factors in computing systems.New York:ACM, 2000:73-80.
[23] ARAZY O, NOVO. Determinants of Wikipedia quality:the roles of global and local contribution inequality[C]//ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. New York:ACM, 2010:233-236.
[24] YE Y, KISHIDA K. Toward an understanding of the motivation open source software developers[C]//International conference on software engineering. Washington, DC:IEEE, 2003:419-429.
[25] VIEGAS F, SMITH M. Newsgroup crowds and authorlines:visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces[C]//Hawaii international conference on system sciences.Washington, DC:IEEE, 2004.
[26] CHAN J, HAYES C, DALY E. Decomposing discussion forums and boards using user roles[C]//ICWSM. Palo Alto:AAAI, 2010(10):215-218.
[27] CHI E, SUH B, KITTUR A, et al. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd:Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie[J]. Physical review B:condensed matter, 2007, 47(47):6470-6479.
[28] ADLER B, DE ALFARO L. A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia[C]//International conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM, 2007:261-270.
[29] WANG Z, ZHANG P. Examining user roles in social Q&A:the case of health topics in Zhihu.com[C]//ASIS&T meeting:creating knowledge, enhancing lives through information & technology.New York:Wiley, 2016:103.
[30] TWEET P. Brokerage and closure:an introduction to social capital[J]. Contemporary sociology, 2006, 35(5):488-489.
[31] HAUTZ J, HUTTER K, FÜLLER J, et al. How to establish an online innovation community? The role of users and their innovative content[C]//Hawaii international conference on systems science. Washington, DC:IEEE,2010:1-11.
[32] FVLLER J, HUTTER K, HAUTZ J, et al. User roles and contributions in innovation-contest communities[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2014, 31(1):273-308.
[33] TORAL S, MARTINEZ-TORRES M, BARRERO F. Analysis of virtual communities supporting OSS projects using social network analysis[J]. Information and software technology, 2010, 52(3):296-303.
[34] CROSS R, LASETER T, PARKER A,et al. Using social network analysis toimprove communities of practice[J]. California management review, 2006,49(1):32-60.
[35] NOLKER R, ZHOU L. Social computing and weighting to identify member roles inonline communities[C]//IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence 2005. Washington, DC:IEEE, 2005:87-93.
[36] FISHER D, SMITH M, WELSER H. You are who you talk to:detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups[C]//Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Washington, DC:IEEE, 2006:59b.
[37] 斯科特, 刘军. 社会网络分析法[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2007.
Outlines

/