Multi-level Author Analysis Model for Scientific Research Service and Empirical Study

  • Huang Yue
Expand
  • School of Information Science, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083

Received date: 2017-11-16

  Revised date: 2018-01-24

  Online published: 2018-05-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Based on the analysis of subject service needs of researchers, this paper constructs a multi-level author analysis model for scientific research service and empirical study, this can provide references for deep-level scientific research service. [Method/process] By investigating the needs of researchers that from the same discipline but with different research levels, this paper found that researchers with different levels have different requirements for specific analysis. Then, by taking the author analysis as an example, this paper proposed a demand model for author analysis corresponding to entry researchers, preoccupied researchers and managed researchers. Finally, in order to illustrate the model, this paper took the core journal papers of Chinese language and characters from 2001 to 2015 as an example, and used different bibliometric methods and softwares to answer the needs of analysis requirements for authors with different research levels. [Result/conclusion] Experimental results show that this model can identify some facts about Chinese language and characters during these 15 years, including core author groups, representative scholars, research groups and cooperation status, as well as recent representative scholars and continuing representative scholars. The presented model is universal and can enhance the integration of librarians in scientific research service.

Cite this article

Huang Yue . Multi-level Author Analysis Model for Scientific Research Service and Empirical Study[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(9) : 112 -122 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.09.014

References

[1] 初景利. 学科馆员对嵌入式学科服务的认知与解析[J]. 图书情报研究,2012,5(3):1-8.
[2] 初景利,张冬荣. 第二代学科馆员与学科化服务[J]. 图书情报工作,2008,52(2):6-10.
[3] 邵敏. 清华大学图书馆学科服务架构与学科馆员队伍建设[J]. 图书情报工作,2008,52(2):11-14.
[4] 刘颖,黄传惠. 嵌入用户环境:图书馆学科服务新方向[J]. 图书情报知识,2010(1):52-59.
[5] 张翔. 基于SERVICE的嵌入式学科服务营销——武汉大学图书馆学科服务探索[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2011(5):73-76.
[6] 陈全松. 高校图书馆嵌入式学科服务模式的实践与思考——以厦门大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2012,56(7):83-87.
[7] 万文娟. "985工程"大学图书馆学科服务实践及不足分析[J]. 图书馆学研究,2012(3):82-87.
[8] 陆莉. "211工程"高校图书馆学科服务现状调查与分析[J]. 图书馆学研究,2013(4):59-63.
[9] 楚存坤,孙思琴,韩丰谈. 基于层次分析法的高校图书馆学科服务评价模式[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2014(6):86-90.
[10] 韩丽风,徐璐. 高校图书馆面向学科服务中的关键问题探索. 图书馆杂志,2010,29(12):45-48.
[11] 陈晶晶,郭晶,徐璟. "拜访教授"服务机制构建与信息需求分析. 图书馆理论与实践, 2013(8):9-10.
[12] 唐吉深. 学科服务精确定位:学科用户需求挖掘方法研究. 图书馆研究,2015,45(6):97-100.
[13] 李晓东,刘素清,肖珑. 高校研究人员学术信息资源利用及信息查寻行为的调查与分析——以北京大学图书馆用户调查为例. 数字图书馆论坛,2009(1):25-42.
[14] 任妮,黄钢强,刘强. 军队院校图书馆"嵌入式馆员"服务需求分析与模式机制设计. 现代情报,2013,33(3):123-128.
[15] 江珊. 一种基于WoS的工科专业学科服务整体方案探讨与实施——以测绘专业为例. 情报理论与实践,2016,39(5):115-119.
[16] 王玉玫,吴淑娟,芦姗. 研究生学科服务需求分析及服务策略探究——以中央财经大学为例. 图书情报工作,2016,60(14):102-108.
[17] 陈欣,贾哲,石萍,等. 特色数据库与学科服务——以西南交通大学图书馆土木工程特色数据库的完善为例. 图书情报工作,2013(S2):83-85.
[18] 张计龙,殷沈琴,陈铁. 基于ERU的图书馆用户信息行为数据采集方法研究——以复旦大学图书馆为例. 图书馆杂志,2014,33(12):10-16.
[19] 侯筱蓉. 基于知识演进的学科战略情报可视化研究. 情报探索,2012(7):28-29.
[20] 李晶,师俏梅. 基于SCIE、ESI的学科信息分析工具的设计与实现. 情报杂志, 2012,31(10):117-121.
[21] 李远明,余慈爱,王文兵. 高校领军人才发现与评价——图书馆学科服务实践探索. 现代情报,2012,32(11):34-38.
[22] 张琳,董颖,毕德强,等. 基于动态数据整合的学者影响力h指数趋势监测与分析. 图书情报工作,2017,61(17):116-121.
[23] 程惠兰,胡小华. 嵌入科研过程的学科服务实践研究. 现代情报,2017,37(12):102-109.
[24] 宋海艳,郭晶,潘卫. 面向科研团队的嵌入式学科服务实践探索. 图书情报工作, 2012,56(1):27-30.
[25] Price D J S. Little science, big science[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1963:33-61.
[26] 丁学东. 文献计量学基础[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1992:204-209,220-232.
[27] CHENC. CiteSpace Ⅱ:Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377.
[28] VAN ECK N J, WALTMAN L. Software survey:VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2):523-538.
Outlines

/