[Purpose/significance] Science and technology innovation is an important strategic support for modern economic system. After the reform and opening up, in order to promote China's economic development, China government introduced and implemented a series of science and technology policy aims to promote the development of science and technology. However, how is the founding effect of these science and technology and policies, how the changes in founding effects in the historical cycle of science and technology policy have caused wide spread concern.[Method/process] This paper conducted an empirical research of the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars Earth Science Project that has been in operation for 20 years(JieQing fund) as an example. In order to overcome the endogeneity problem caused by sample selection bias,the study used DID model to assess the effect of fund for distinguished young on the research papers output efficiency of scientists, and put forward the "environment-motivation-behavior" model to explain the research result.[Result/conclusion] The empirical results show that between 1994 to 2008, the significant funding effect of JieQing fund reached 12 years, with a significant proportion 80%. Scientists who have received JieQing fund(JieQing Scientists) were able to published more 0.412 to 3.234 papers per year than those who have not received JieQing fund. After data conversion,compared with other scientists who in the same period(Same period Scientists) of JieQing Scientists, JieQing scientists can published more 0.426-3.277 papers per year. The largest funded effect of JieQing fund was in 2002, but the funding effect was not significant in 2007 and 2008. When evaluating the effect of science and technology policy support, the control group can be constructed by this method in this paper to achieve the research purpose of causal effect inference.
Tian Renhe
,
Zhang Zhiqiang
,
Yu Jie
,
Wang Ping
. Empirical Research on the Funding Effect of Science and Technology Policy Based on DID Model: Take the 20 Years of Implementation of Distinguished Young Scientists' Fund in Earth Science Projects as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(18)
: 110
-121
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.18.012
[1] 中国科技统计[EB/OL].[2017-09-10]. http://www.sts.org.cn/.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家统计局[EB/OL].[2017-09-11]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/.
[3] Web of Science所有数据库主页[EB/OL].[2017-10-05]. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/UA_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=7E8jY66tkUVtDwOl2Yd&preferencesSaved=.
[4] 基础研究经费:"5%之谜",抑或中国特色的"规律"?[EB/OL].[2017-10-09]. http://www.sohu.com/a/197079231_753093.
[5] WEI Y. Policy:boost basic research in China[J]. Nature, 2016, 534:467-469.
[6] SUN Y T, CAO C. China:standardize R&D costing[J]. Nature, 2016, 536(4):30-31.
[7] NOORDEN R V. China by the numbers[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(1):452-453.
[8] XIN H. Five-year plan boosts basic research funding[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6280):1382-1382.
[9] 彭科峰. 基础研究经费:学界一片"涨声"[EB/OL].[2017-12-15]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2014/4/291179.shtm.
[10] 唐婷, 刘园园, 王春. 迈向科技强国,基础研究如何发力[EB/OL].[2017-12-15]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/9/389420.shtm.
[11] 张先恩, 刘云, 周程, 等. 基础研究内涵及投入统计的国际比较[J]. 中国软科学, 2017, 5(1):131-138.
[12] 程瑶. 我国基础研究投入的现状分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 20(5):62-66.
[13] 杨爱华. 我国基础研究投入的现状比较与分析(2001-2010)[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 27(3):34-38.
[14] 王利政. 我国基础研究经费来源分析及政策建议[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(12):26-31.
[15] 姚常乐, 高昌林. 我国基础研究经费投入现状分析与政策建议[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2011(3):5-9.
[16] BENAVENTE J M, CRESPI G, GARONE L F, et al. The impact of national research funds:a regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT[J]. Research policy, 2012, 41(8):1461-1475.
[17] ASHISH A, ALFONSO G. The impact of NSF support for basic research in economics[R]. Econ papers, 2005(79/80):1-28.
[18] POPP D. Using Scientific publications to evaluate govemment R&D spending:the case of energy[R]. Cambridge:Cesifo working paper, 2015:8-13.
[19] AZOULAY P, GRAFF ZIVIN J S, LI D, et al. Public R&D investments and private-sector patening:evidence from NIH funding rules[R]. Cambridg:NBER working paper, 2015:1-30.
[20] 史晓敏,彭杰,官建成. 国家自然科学基金重点项目和杰出青年科学基金项目产出绩效比较[J]. 科技与管理, 2004, 6(1):128-130.
[21] 胡平,吴善超,李聪, 等. 我国杰出青年科技人才资助成果的评价研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, 3(1):190-194.
[22] 周萍,张旭,周冬梅. 中国主要基金的中文论文产出绩效比较[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012(19):43-48..
[23] 国家自然科学基金委员会. 国家杰出青年科学基金在线[EB/OL].[2017-09-10]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab313/.
[24] CAO C, Suttmeier R P. China's new scientific elite:distinguished young scientists, the research environment and hopes for Chinese science[J/OL].[2018-02-25]. https://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~chinaus/publications/China's%20new%20scientific%20elite.pdf.
[25] 赵雷,金盛华,孙丽, 等. 青年创新人才创造力发展的影响因素——基于对25位"杰青"获得者访谈的质性分析[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2011, 30(3):68-73.
[26] 高祀会. 哈尔滨工程大学"杰青"培养模式研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2011.
[27] 万懿. 个体成长与科研环境对杰青科研产出的影响-以国家杰出青年科学基金生命科学领域受资助者为例[D]. 北京:中国科学院心理学研究所, 2014.
[28] 张烨. 文献计量视角下高层次人才学术成长特征研究——以管理学部杰青基金获得者为例[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2016.
[29] 张瑜. 我国一流青年生物医学科学家科技产出研究——以国家杰出青年科学基金获得者和长江学者特聘教授为例[D]. 太原:山西医科大学, 2016.
[30] CRESPI G A, GEUNA. An empirical study of scientific production:a cross country analysis, 1981-2002[J]. Research policy, 2008, 37(4):565-579.
[31] GUSH J, JAFFE A, LARSEN V, et.al. The effect of public funding on research output:the New Zealand Marsden Fund[R]. NBER WORKING PAPER No. 216522015, (3):1-43.
[32] MOED H F. Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 53(3):281-296.
[33] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[34] Web of Science核心合集帮助检索"授权号"字段[EB/OL].[2017-09-10]. http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS521R5/help/zh_CN/WOS/hs_grant_number.html.
[35] 赵西亮. 基本有用的计量经济学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2017:161-162.
[36] ANGRIST, J D. Mostly harmless econometrics:an empiricist's companion[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2010:165-169.
[37] JACOB B A, LEFGREN L. The Impact of research grant funding on scientific producrivity[J]. Journal of public economics, 2011, 95(9):1168-1177.
