Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 20: 33 - 42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.20.004

Research on Sustainability of Government Information Service Evaluation System

  • Dong Yu ,
  • An Xiaomi
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102600;
    2. School of Information Resources Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    3. Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100872;
    4. Smart City Research Center of Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Received date: 2018-04-07

  Revised date: 2018-07-04

  Online published: 2018-10-20

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] At present, a normalization mechanism for evaluation activities has become an effective management strategy for governments at all levels to improve their information services.However, the complexity, diversity, and developmental nature of today's society have continually impacted the application of existing evaluation systems, which requires urgent research on the sustainability of the evaluation system.[Method/process] A sustainability evaluation system model S-PPF (Space-Past Present Futuremodel) is proposed in this paper. At the theoretical level, the model embodies the differences in the set of evaluation indicators, the relevance of the evaluation objectives, and the developmental nature based on the criteria of past, present and future, and at the application level,the operability is achieved by proposing the concept of evaluation continuum and related practical principles.[Result/conclusion] The study found that the S-PPF model can simultaneously solve the the problems of pertinence, relevance, and timeliness of the evaluation system, which can be used as an effective solution to the sustainability of the evaluation system.

Key words： government information service; evaluation system; sustainability; S-PPF model; evaluation continuum

Cite this article

Dong Yu , An Xiaomi . Research on Sustainability of Government Information Service Evaluation System[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(20) : 33 -42 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.20.004

References

[1] 侯合银. 复杂适应系统的特征及其可持续发展问题研究[J]. 系统科学学报,2008(4):81-85.
[2] 马费成,夏义堃. 我国政府信息服务的现状与创新[J]. 图书情报工作,2003,47(12):19-23.
[3] 李静. 论我国公共图书馆开展政府信息服务的理论与实践[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(13):135-138.
[4] 张锐昕,董丽. 公共服务质量:特质属性和评估策略[J].北京行政学院学报, 2014(6):8-14.
[5] 吴建南. 公共部门绩效评估:理论与实践[J]. 中国科学基金,2009,23(3):149-154.
[6] WORD J, STREAM C, LUKASIAK K. What cannot be counted:ethics, innovation, and evaluation in the delivery of public services[J].Innovation journal, 2011,16(2):1-17.
[7] MERKYS G, BRAZIENE R. Evaluation of public services provided by municipalities in Lithuania:an experience of applying a standardized survey inventory[J].Social sciences, 2009,4(66):50-61.
[8] RIEPER O, MAYNE J. Evaluation and public service quality[J]. International journal of social welfare, 1998, 7(2):118-125.
[9] 赵莉晓. 创新政策评估理论方法研究——基于公共政策评估逻辑框架的视角[J]. 科学学研究,2014,32(2):195-202.
[10] 冯琳,高波. 美国公共图书馆绩效评估理论研究[J]. 图书馆建设,2012(3):22-26.
[11] BOYNE G, DAY P, WALKER R. The evaluation of public service inspection:a theoretical framework[J]. Urban studies, 2002, 39(7):1197-1212.
[12] 胡秀梅,贾哲. 基于差异显著性检验的图书馆服务质量评估方法探析[J]. 图书情报工作,2012,56(1):78-81.
[13] 罗哲,张宇豪. 基本公共教育服务均等化绩效评估理论框架研究——基于平衡计分卡[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2):132-138.
[14] 盛明科. 政府绩效评估的主观评议与多指标综合评价的比较——兼论服务型政府绩效评估方法的科学选择[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,33(1):14-18.
[15] 王荣祥. 基于QFD的图书馆服务质量评估方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2011,55(5):23-27.
[16] 王嵘. 高校图书馆服务质量评估方法的研究[J]. 图书馆建设,2008(6):77-80.
[17] 董丽,吴冬曼,周虹,等. 基于LibQUAL+TM的图书馆服务质量评估方法研究和实践分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2006(3):76-81.
[18] KEAST R, WATERHOUSE J. Participatory evaluation:a missing component in the sustainable social change equation for public services[J]. Strategic change, 2010, 15(1):23-35.
[19] BROWN T. Coercion versus choice:citizen evaluations of public service quality across methods of consumption[J]. Public administration review, 2007, 67(3):559-572.
[20] 邹凯,左珊,陈旸,等. 基于网络舆情的政府信息服务公众满意度评价研究[J]. 情报科学,2016,34(2):45-49.
[21] 李友芝,谭貌. 政府信息服务绩效评估指标体系的构建[J]. 情报科学,2013,31(12):33-37.
[22] 雷勇. 公共图书馆政府信息服务绩效评价指标体系的构建[J]. 图书馆,2012(5):121-123.
[23] 周伟,叶常林,韩家勤. 政府信息服务绩效评估指标体系的科学构建[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(13):139-142.
[24] 姚若松,江平,梁英士. 动态绩效评估概念、范式及其影响因素[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,14(7):67-72.
[25] 王璐,庞皓,何平. 一种新的动态综合评价模型及应用[J]. 统计与决策,2006(24):28-30.
[26] 周建伦,刘飞. 我国区域经济发展水平的动态综合评价[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008(5):9-15.
[27] 吴价宝,张勤虎. 创新型城市动态评价研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2013,32(3):113-120.
[28] 李建霞. 高校图书馆二阶段绩效动态评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(7):61-68.
[29] 曹志梅. 基于动态模糊集的图书馆动态模糊综合评价[J]. 图书情报工作,2005(10):52-54.
[30] 周青奎,杨益民. 评价指标体系动态修正的可拓方法初探[J]. 统计与决策,2008(24):7-9.
[31] 孟华. 推进以公共服务为主要内容的政府绩效评估——从机构绩效评估向公共服务绩效评估的转变[J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(2):16-20.
[32] 吴加琪,徐祥丰. 构建发展性档案工作评价机制的思考[J].档案与建设, 2014(4):25-28.
[33] 朱启贵. 可持续发展评估[M]. 上海:上海财经大学出版社, 1999.
[34] 王旭. 系统、系统规律与系统方法[J].哲学研究, 1984(7):43-49.
[35] DAVIS P, WEST K. What do public values mean for public action? Putting public values in their plural place[J]. The American review of public administration, 2009, 39(6):602-618.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.