[Purpose/significance] With the increasing demand for self-check system in domestic libraries, its function and cost are becoming more and more concerned. This article compares and analyzes the functions of Barcode mode, RFID model and Barcode+RFID mode, and provides reference for the purchase of domestic libraries.[Method/process] Based on the full investigation, the functions and characteristics of various models were summarized, and the cost price, borrowing and returning speed and safety of the three models were compared and analyzed.[Result/conclusion] The D self-check system in Barcode mode is cheaper and has better functions than similar products. It is recommended that small and medium-sized libraries in China should give priority to buying Barcode mode when they choose to purchase self-check system.
[1] 毛兴武,张根彬.RFID技术在高校图书馆书库管理中的应用实践与探索[J]. 图书情报工作,2008,52(7):106-109.
[2] 黄敏聪.图书馆分布式借还书系统分析[J]. 图书情报工作,2012,56(1):102-106.
[3] 余波,王颖纯,刘蕊松.无线电射频技术与美国高校图书馆[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(12):12-16.
[4] 唐立芳,姜国平.浅谈高校图书馆应用RFID技术后对服务管理的影响[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2017(4):167-168.