[Purpose/significance] With the fourth paradigm of data-intensive scientific discovery emerging, research data management has been an important prerequisite for data-intensive scientific discovery. By the survey of Keeping Research Data Safe model, this paper aims to provide a reference for the research data management in China.[Method/process] This paper analyzed the JISC-funded Keeping Research Data Safe (KRDS) and the KRDS-based practice of overseas universities by literature research and Web-based survey, then analyzed the characteristics, steps and experiences and lessons learned of research data management cost analysis based on KRDS. Finally, it proposed specific measures for research data management cost analysis in China.[Result/conclusion] KRDS model is a universal and systematical framework. It can fully involve and predict the key cost of each activity. KRDS could provide a direction, standardize the management process, and refine management costs and benefits in China.
Wei Junchao
,
Li Sixue
,
Liu Panpan
. Investigation and Analysis on KRDS Model of Cost and Benefits for Research Data Management[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(24)
: 93
-103
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.24.013
[1] Managing and sharing data[EB/OL].[2018-04-13]. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/media/2894/managingsharing.pdf.
[2] PALAIOLOGK A S, ECONOMIDES A A, TJALSMA H D, et al. An activity-based costing model for long-term preservation and dissemination of digital research data:the case of DANS[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2012, 12(4):195-214.
[3] CONSORTIUM OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA ARCHIVES. CESSDA SaW[EB/OL].[2018-04-13]. https://www.cessda.eu/Projects/All-projects/CESSDA-SaW.
[4] KEJSER U B, NIELSEN A B, THIRIFAYS A. Cost model for digital preservation:cost of digital migration[J]. The international journal of digital curation, 2011, 6(1):225-267.
[5] NASA.CET V2p4 tech description 080915[EB/OL].[2018-04-14]. http://opensource.gsfc.nasa.gov/projects/CET/index.php.
[6] LIFE. An introduction to the third phase of the LIFE project[EB/OL].[2018-04-14]. http://www.life.ac.uk/3/docs/life3_report.pdf.
[7] BEAGRIE C. Keeping research data safe:cost-benefit studies, tools, and methodologies focusing on long-lived data[EB/OL].[2018-04-15]. https://www.beagrie.com/krds.php.
[8] 苏小波, 常娥. 数字资源长期保存的成本影响因素分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2011(1):20-24, 44.
[9] 肖英. 数字信息保存成本研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2004(11):14-17.
[10] 杨鹤林. 数据监护:美国高校图书馆的新探索[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011(2):18-21, 41.
[11] 臧国全, 李思思. 数字保存项目的投资决策研究——基于项目投资成本不确定性的分析[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2014(8):36-41.
[12] 孙超, 吴振新. 国外数字资源长期保存成熟度模型及其分析与评价[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(1):32-39.
[13] 肖秋会, 许晓彤, 卞君妍. 数字保存成本模型LIFE和CDL-TCP比较与评价[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18):12-18.
[14] 李海涛. 会计成本视角下的公共图书馆数字保存成本模型[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2017, 37(2):75-82.
[15] Keeping research data safe1[EB/OL].[2018-04-23]. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615221657/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/keepingresearchdatasafe0408.pdf.
[16] Keeping research data safe2[EB/OL].[2018-04-28]. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615221405/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.pdf.
[17] I2S2 idealised scientific research activity lifecycle model[EB/OL].[2018-04-30]. https://www.beagrie.com/krds-i2s2/.
[18] Keeping research data safe2-a JISC-funded project[EB/OL].[2018-05-02]. https://www.beagrie.com/jisc/.
[19] UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. Research data management[EB/OL].[2018-05-01]. http://www.data.cam.ac.uk/repository.
[20] Southampton data survey:our experience and lessons learned[EB/OL].[2018-05-01]. http://www.disc-uk.org/docs/SouthamptonDAF.pdf.
[21] HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND. Transparent approach to costing an overview of TRAC[EB/OL].[2018-04-15]. http://www.jcpsg.ac.uk/guidance/downloads/Overview.pdf.
[22] KRDS user guide[EB/OL].[2018-04-17]. https://www.beagrie.com/static/resource/KeepingResearchDataSafe_UserGuide_v2.pdf.
[23] Detailed version of KRDS2 activity model[EB/OL].[2018-04-20]. https://www.beagrie.com/KRDS2_Activity_Model_detailed.doc.
[24] 刘霞, 饶艳. 高校图书馆科学数据管理与服务初探——武汉大学图书馆案例分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(6):33-38.
[25] 复旦大学社会科学数据平台[EB/OL].[2018-05-05]. https://dvn.fudan.edu.cn/home/index.jsp.
[26] 北京大学开放研究数据平台[EB/OL].[2018-05-05]. http://opendata.pku.edu.cn/.
[27] UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX. UK data archive[EB/OL].[2018-04-14]. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/.
[28] KRDS benefits framework worksheet[EB/OL].[2018-05-02]. https://www.beagrie.com/KRDS_BenefitsFramework_Worksheetv1word_July2011.doc.
[29] Benefits impact worksheet[EB/OL].[2018-05-03]. https://www.beagrie.com/Benefits%20Impact%20Worksheet_v1excel_July2011.xls.
[30] Value chain and benefits impact worksheet[EB/OL].[2018-05-03]. https://www.beagrie.com/KRDS-ValueChainImpactTool_%20Worksheet_v1excel_July2011.xls.
[31] 卫军朝, 蔚海燕. "数据资产框架(DAF)"视角下的机构数据资产审计调研与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(8):59-67, 92.
[32] WHEATLEY P, AYRIS P, DAVIES R, et al. LIFE:costing the digital preservation lifecycle[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2008(1):69-74.
[33] SMITH M K, BARTON M, BASS M, et al. DSpace:an open source dynamic digital repository[J] D-lib magazine, 2003, 9(1):10-17.
