[Purpose/significance] With the development of knowledge platforms, it has been an important issue to improve the function and design of knowledge platform through systems evaluation. The article is aimed at exploring the evaluation elements and criteria for the evaluation of knowledge platform.[Method/process] The article is start up with the evaluation of information retrieval. It reviews related studies on the evaluation of information retrieval systems and digital libraries, especially addressing the theoretical models, elements, and criteria of digital library evaluation.[Result/conclusion] Based on the review and discussion, the article identifies and addresses the elements and criteria for the evaluation of knowledge platforms.
Li Yuelin
,
Han Hongliang
. From the Evaluation for Information Retrieval Systems to the Evaluation for Knowledge Platform[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(1)
: 52
-59
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.01.008
[1] 郝梦.知识构建视角下的知识服务平台评价研究[D].天津:南开大学,2018.
[2] SPARCK J K. Information retrieval experiment[M].London:Butterworths.1981.
[3] LANCASTER F W. MEDLARS:report on the evaluation of its operating efficiency[J].American documentation, 1969,20(2):119-142.
[4] TSAKONAS G, MITRELIS A, PAPACHRISTOPOULOS L, et al. An exploration of the digital library evaluation literature based on an ontological representation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013,64(9):1914-1926.
[5] SARACEVIC T. Digital library evaluation:toward an evolution of concepts[J]. Library trends, 2000,49(3):350-369.
[6] FUHR N, HANSEN P, MABE M, et al. Digital libraries:a generic classification and evaluation scheme[C]//European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries. Berlin:Springer Press, 2001:187-199.
[7] TSAKONAS G, KAPIDAKIS S, PAPACHRISTOPOULOS C. Evaluation of user interaction in digital libraries[OL].[2018-10-27]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.101.9642&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[8] SARACEVIC T. Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR):a review and proposal[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1996,33(1):3-9.
[9] ZHANG Y. Developing a holistic for digital library evaluation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1):88-110.
[10] 李月琳, 梁娜, 齐雪. 从交互维度到交互功能:构建数字图书馆交互评估理论模型[J].中国图书馆学报, 2016,42(1):66-82.
[11] 张晓林. 走向知识服务:寻找新世纪图书情报工作的生长点[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2000,26(5):30-35.
[12] 李晨晖, 崔建明, 陈超泉. 大数据知识服务平台构建关键技术研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2013(2):29-34.
[13] 王知津, 于晓燕. 数字图书馆网格的资源发现方法及其分析评价[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2010,29(6):16-20.
[14] 谢晓阳. 基于网格的知识服务平台[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2006,29(3):374-375,348.
[15] 高东平, 方安, 李杨, 等. 知识服务平台的设计与应用——以重大传染病信息知识服务平台为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011,34(7):111-115.
[16] 姜永常. CNKI数字图书馆知识服务研究[J]. 情报学报, 2004,23(3):265-274.
[17] 马捷, 吴琼, 亓莉莉. 公共服务管理平台知识服务内容解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010,54(6):40-43,101.
[18] 吴赟, 孙梦如. 中国出版业发展知识服务的路径思考——从爱思唯尔ClinicalKey超级医学平台谈起[J]. 出版广角, 2017(13):13-16.
[19] 于彤, 张竹绿, 贾李蓉. 面向循证医学的知识服务平台概述[J]. 中国中医药图书情报杂志, 2014,38(4):55-57.
[20] BELKIN N J, MARCHETTI P G, ALBRECHT M, et al. User interfaces for information systems[J]. Journal of information science, 1991,17(6):327-344.
[21] 陈代春. 高校图书馆知识服务平台构建探析[J]. 情报科学, 2008,26(6):841-844.
[22] 何绍华, 王培林. 知识管理环境下的我国图书馆知识服务模式研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2007(5):619-621,637.
[23] 李芳慧, 王玲."互联网+"时代下的知识服务平台运营模式探究[J].图书馆学研究, 2018(12):63-67.
[24] 常红, 田野, 沙淑欣. 图书馆信息推送服务用户接受研究[J]. 图书馆论坛,2014,34(11):106-111.
[25] 刘明珠, 杨建林. 微博搜索、网页搜索对用户信息需求满足能力的对比分析——以新浪微博搜索、百度搜索为例[J]. 图书与情报, 2016(5):126-136.
[26] 王若佳, 李月琳. 基于用户体验的健康类搜索引擎可用性评估[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(7):92-102.
[27] 冯缨, 张瑞云. 基于用户体验的微博信息质量评估研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2014(9):62-67,101.
[28] 王璟璇, 杨道玲. 基于用户体验的政府网站绩效评估:探索与实践[J].电子政务, 2014(5):35-41.
[29] 陈丛聪. 面向用户体验的移动B2C界面可用性评估研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2014.
[30] 齐雪.数字图书馆交互功能评估研究[D]. 天津:南开大学,2014.
[31] BORLUND P, INGWERSEN P. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems[J]. Journal of documentation, 1997, 53(3):225-250.
[32] 李月琳, 肖雪, 胡蝶. 信息检索实验中的任务设计——真实与模拟仿真工作任务的比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(16):5-12.
[33] LI Y, HU D. Interactive retrieval using simulated versus real work task situations:differences in sub-facets of tasks and interaction performance[J/OL]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 50(1):1-10.[2018-12-06]. http://www.asis.org/asist2013/proceedings/openpage.html.
