[Purpose/significance] Understanding the logical relationship and educational level of the threshold concept in ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education is the prerequisite and foundation of constructing a university’s information literacy education ecosystem. [Method/process] It studied the construction process of the ecological chain of the information literacy education in universities, by making a three-dimensional analysis of the logical architecture of information literacy in the framework and explained the educational framework of information literacy, based on combining the case of the "historical and cultural study of the lighthouse" in the library of City University Hong Kong. [Result/conclusion] The construction of the ecological system of information literacy education is a reliable and stable education system, which is based on cultivating students’ judgment, analytical power and research ability, including general education, skill education, expanding education, and the complete educational process of the cooperation of multiple personnel and organizations.
Wei Haiyan
. The Construction of Information Literacy Education Ecosystem in University from the Perspective of ACRL's Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: A Case Study of Library of City University of Hong Kong[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(6)
: 56
-63
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.06.008
[1] ACRL.Framework for information literacy for higher education(Chinese translation)[EB/OL].[2018-05-10].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/framework-chinese.pdf.
[2] SCHULTE S J, KNAPP M. Awareness, adoption, and application of the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) framework for information literacy in health sciences libraries[J]. J med libr assoc, 2017, 105(4):347-354.
[3] 刘彩娥,冯素洁.ACRL的《高等教育信息素养框架》解读与启示[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(5):143-147.
[4] 张蒂.基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的实践路径探讨——以南开大学图书馆为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(1):47-55.
[5] 李瞳,叶志锋.基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的我国高校信息素养教材质量评价与编写建议[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(8):54-59.
[6] 王春生.美国ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》简析[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(4):43-47.
[7] 温伯格.万物皆无序:新数字秩序的革命[M].李燕鸣,译.太原:山西人民出版社,2017.
[8] 陈德祥,曲扬,李锐.新信息环境下信息管理专业信息伦理课程设置的三种体系设计[J].图书馆学研究,2018(5):20-23.
[9] 徐路.新技术环境下高校图书馆发展趋势研究——基于ACRL《高校图书馆发展大趋势报告:2016版》分析[J].图书与情报,2017(4):83-90.
[10] 叶艳,代君.跨学科协同信息行为模式及特征研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017(4):68-73.
[11] CHING S H.Turning a service learning experience into a model of student engagement:the Heritage Research Connections (LHRC) project in Hong Kong[J].The journal of academic librarianship,2018(44):196-206.
