Research on Users Reading Preferences Difference and Reading Promotion Strategy of Library Reading Pavilion

  • Wang Yongsheng ,
  • Xu Guxiong ,
  • Yin Xiaomin
Expand
  • 1. Library of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018;
    2. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018;
    3. Guangzhou Yougu Information Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510000

Received date: 2018-08-06

  Revised date: 2018-10-14

  Online published: 2019-05-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper explores the construction of reading pavilion in libraries from the perspective of reading promotion. Based on the analysis of big data, this paper analyzes the differences of reading preferences among users of reading pavilion in libraries and puts forward the strategies for reading promotion of reading pavilion in libraries.[Method/process] After defining reading pavilion as a new form of reading promotion, 105 496 pieces of reading data from 12 libraries were encoded, descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression model tests were conducted using SPSS 21.0, and qualitative research methods were used to explore the reading promotion strategies of reading pavilion.[Result/conclusion] The result of case analysis shows that there is a significant negative correlation between the length of reading works and the number of playback. There was a positive correlation between the number of views of the reading works and the number of plays of the audience. Classical literature material, leisure work material and theme education material have a significant positive effect on the number of playback; After viewing leisure segment works, audiences have the highest playback rate and education themed works have the highest standard deviation. Different library types have significant effects on the number of readings played. Therefore, this paper proposes that the reading promotion strategy for reading pavilion can be promoted from three aspects: the operator can review the online work classification and service optimization, the library can carry out a series of reading promotion activities and guide in-depth reading, the reading association and other organizations, and the reader can actively play the role of the reading promoter.

Cite this article

Wang Yongsheng , Xu Guxiong , Yin Xiaomin . Research on Users Reading Preferences Difference and Reading Promotion Strategy of Library Reading Pavilion[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019 , 63(9) : 38 -46 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.09.005

References

[1] 王尚文.走进语文教学之门[M].上海:上海教育出版社, 2007:394.
[2] 鲁景超."设立首都全民朗读日"断想[J].现代传播,2010(5):136-137.
[3] 屈明颖.数字阅读拐点及阅读趋势变迁问题研究——以历年"全国国民阅读调查"内容变化、数据分析为视角[J].出版广角,2016(23):10-13,17.
[4] 初景利,杨志刚.物竞天择,适者生存——图书馆新消亡论论辩[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(11):5-11.
[5] 范并思.阅读推广的服务自觉[J].图书与情报,2016(6):72-76.
[6] 范并思.阅读推广与图书馆学:基础理论问题分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(5):4-13.
[7] 麦克卢汉.麦克卢汉精粹[M].何道宽,译. 南京:南京大学出版社,2000:363-364.
[8] 肖芃.朗读类节目:从文字到影像的意义增值[J].现代传播,2017,39(8):81-84.
[9] 吴晞.图书馆阅读推广基础理论[M].北京:朝华出版社,2015:163-166.
[10] Library acts of culture:West Boulevard Library[EB/OL].[2017-06-15].http//www.knightarts.org/community/charlotte/library-acts-of-culture-west-boulevard-library.
[11] IFLA.图书馆员及其他信息工作者的伦理准则[EB/OL].[2017-09-08].http:/www.ifla.org/files/assets/faife/codesofethics/Chinese code of ethicsfull.pdf.
[12] 聂欣如.思考《朗读者》的朗读[J].中国电视,2017(10):85-90.
[13] 刘时容.传统文化电视节目运作形式在高校阅读推广中的应用研究[J].图书馆建设,2017(1):79-84.
[14] 王露莎.朗读类综艺节目对高校图书馆阅读推广工作的启示[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(14):94-98.
Outlines

/