Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2019 , Vol. 63 >Issue 9: 116 - 126

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.09.013

Research on the Organizational Management Mode of Library Consortium Abroad

  • Kuang Wanling ,
  • Gao Bo
Expand
  • 1. Library of Shunde Polytechnic, Foshan 528300;
    2. School of Economic & Management of South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006

Received date: 2018-08-22

  Revised date: 2018-12-09

  Online published: 2019-05-05

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Development of the organizational management mode of library consortium in China is not mature. Lack of standardized regulation and fixed administrative staff leads to low operating efficiency of the organization and makes it difficult to achieve target. In contrast, earlier development of foreign library consortium results in a more mature and fixed mode, and its excellent organizational management experience is helpful for reference.[Method/process] In this study, 100 foreign library consortium all over the continents were selected as the investigation object and their organizational management mode were explored by employing literature survey, online survey, inductive method and comparative approach.[Result/conclusion] After analysis and induce the settings of management structure, administration authority and discussion mechanism of each management mode, four main characteristics about the organizational management mode of foreign library consortium are revealed: the organizational management policy is complete; the alliance members have a high degree of participation; the administrative departments have well defined power and responsibility; efficient in managing and operating the consortium. Consequently, the suggestions are put forward that regime is the guarantee to standardize library consortium management; high participation is the key to cooperative management in library consortium, and clarified responsibility is the main point in refined management and a steady management team is the premise of effective management in library consortium.

Key words： library consortium; organizational management mode; management structure; council management mode

Cite this article

Kuang Wanling , Gao Bo . Research on the Organizational Management Mode of Library Consortium Abroad[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019 , 63(9) : 116 -126 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.09.013

References

[1] 董琴娟.中国图书馆联盟发展研究[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2013:98-121.
[2] 杜杏叶,李亚峰,李贺,等.我国图书馆联盟管理与运行机制现状调查研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(9):37-45.
[3] 高凡.网络环境下的资源共享:图书馆联盟实现机制与策略研究[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2006:240.
[4] 刘丽萍.图书馆联盟治理的结构、机制及策略[J].图书馆,2015(6):48-51,76.
[5] 曾春春,詹庆东.区域性图书馆联盟的自组织治理[J].图书馆论坛,2017(2):83-91.
[6] NFILA R B,DARKO-AMPEM K.Developments in academic library consortia from the 1960s through to 2000:a review of the literature[J].Library management,2002,23(4/5):203-212.
[7] HIREMATH U.Electronic consortia:resource sharing in the digital age[J].Collection building,2001,20(2):80-88.
[8] PAYNE L.The Washington Research Library Consortium:a real organization for a virtual library[J].Information technology and libraries,1998,17(1):13-17.
[9] 孔令玉,高波.美国的图书馆信息资源共享模式[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(5):34-38.
[10] HULSE B,CHEVERIE J F,DYGERT C T.ALADIN research commons:a consortial institutional repository[J].OCLC systems & services,2007,23(2):158-169.
[11] 李国庆.世界图书馆联盟的典范:OhioLINK信息资源共享模式研究[J].图书情报工作, 2004,48(7):13-16.
[12] TREHUB A, WILSON T C. Keeping it simple:the Alabama Digital Preservation Network (ADPNet)[J].Library hi tech, 2010,28(2):245-258.
[13] 高波,孙琼.加拿大图书馆信息资源共享模式研究[J].图书馆论坛,2008,28(6):127-130.
[14] 严丹.加拿大安大略省学术门户Scholars Portal的资源建设模式及其启示[J].图书馆建设, 2012(5):26-29.
[15] 李朝阳,高波.英国图书馆信息资源共享模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(3):137-141.
[16] 朱前东,高波.德国的图书馆信息资源共享模式[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(5):43-48.
[17] 杨丽,高波.西欧四国的图书馆信息资源共享模式[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(5):39-42.
[18] ECHEVERRIA M,JIMENEZ S.Interlending and document supply in the context of Spanish library consortia[J].Interlending & document supply,2011,39(4):190-199.
[19] 钱丹丹,高波.北欧四国的图书馆信息资源共享模式[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(5):49-54.
[20] KARASOZEN B,LINDLEY J A.The impact of ANKOS:consortium development in Turkey[J].The journal of academic librarianship,2004,30(5):402-409.
[21] 李宝强,祝忠明,吴新年.AARLN的发展及其服务模式对我国科技型图书馆服务建设的启示[J].情报理论与实践,2005,28(4):383-387.
[22] 洪彤,王茜.日本JUSTICE对我国外语院校图书馆联盟建设的启示[J].图书馆工作与研究,2012(9):65-68.
[23] AHMED M H,SULEIMAN R J.Academic library consortium in Jordan:an evaluation study[J].The journal of academic librarianship,2013,39(2):138-143.
[24] 梁丽君,高波.印度图书馆信息资源共享模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(15):105-108.
[25] EDWARDS H M.South Africa's GAELIC:The Gauteng and Environs Library Consortium[J].Information technology and libraries,1999,18(3):123-28.
[26] HORMIA-POUTANEN K,XENIDOU-DERVOU C,KUPRYTE R,et al.Consortia in Europe:describing the various solutions through four country examples[J].Library trends,2006,54(3):359-381.
[27] 张学福.图书馆联盟共建共享机制研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2008,34(173):33-37.
[28] 白冰,高波.国外图书馆资源共享现状、特点及启示[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(205):108-121.
[29] 李振玲.基于社会网络的图书馆联盟治理机制研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2016(8):32-36.
[30] TAL.Board of directors[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://thealbertalibrary.ca/about-tal/board-and-committees/board_of_directors.
[31] CARLI.Board of directors[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].https://www.carli.illinois.edu/governance/committee-directory/comm?comm_id=1&constit=yes&dates=yes.
[32] LYRASIS.Bylaws[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Documents/LYRASIS-Amended-Bylaws-April-2017.pdf.
[33] CUUL.Functional committee[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://cuul.or.ug/index.php/about-cuul/cuul-organogram-2017.
[34] CUUL.Executive committee[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://cuul.or.ug/index.php/about-cuul/executive-committee.
[35] LMBA.Articles of association[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.lmba.lt/sites/default/files/Articles_of_Association-EN.pdf.
[36] TexShare.Advisory boards[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].https://www.tsl.texas.gov/agency/advisories.html.
[37] About the IC[EB/OL].[2018-05-18].http://hvar.is/index.php?page=information-page.
[38] NSLA E-Resources Consortium.Administration[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.nslaconsortium.org.au/sites/nslaconsortium.org.au/files/consortium_tor_2015.pdf.
[39] BTAA. Provosts[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.btaa.org/about/provosts.
[40] CRIStin's agreements[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.cristin.no/english/consortium/agreements/index.html.
[41] BIBSAM consortium[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.kb.se/bibliotek/centrala-avtal/BIBSAM-Consortium/.
[42] How IReL is managed[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.irelibrary.ie/about.aspx#linkManaged.
[43] PALNI groups and committees[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.palni.org/governance-organization/groups-committees/.
[44] RRLC.Bylaws[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].https://rrlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/RRLC-Bylaws-APPROVED-May-2017.pdf.
[45] 王丽华.图书馆联盟理论基础探寻[J].大学图书馆学报,2010(6):35-41.
[46] 孙波,刘万国,房玉琦.美国典型区域图书馆联盟对比分析及启示——以OHIOLINK和CARLI为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(24):45-54.
[47] 杜春光,陈伟.美国伊利诺伊州学术与研究图书馆联盟——CARLI研究与启示[J].图书馆学研究,2011(9):84-87.
[48] 张宏涛.美国科罗拉多研究图书馆联盟发展现状与启示[J].图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18):53-59.
[49] UALC.Council[EB/OL].[2018-05-18].http://www.ualc.net/Council.html#ROTATION.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.