[Purpose/significance] Fair use is one of the important mechanisms to keep the interests balance between copyright owner and the public. This is particularly crucial for the library bearing public cultural service function. However, in the practice, the fair use clauses of library do not give full play to the role of balancing interests, it is very necessary to find out its causes.[Method/process] Through the comparison with the extraterritorial legislation, as well as the case analysis in judicial practice, we could jump to conclusions:the main problem of library fair use in our country is that the current law and regulations are lag and unclear, resulting to its application range is very narrow. The narrow range is even more reduced by the license agreement and technical measures.[Result/conclusion] In order to dissolve those issues, we could perfect the law through the following aspects:add a principle regulation, define clearly its mandatory legal attribute, and emerge the application of some relevant clauses. Meanwhile, library also should strengthen its intellectual property management level, improve the quality of intellectual property rights, and strictly comply with laws and regulations to eliminate the infringement risk.
Wang Guo
,
Zhang Libin
. Chanllenges, Plight and Solutions: Further Discussion on Library Fair Use Clauses and Its Application Under the Digital Environment[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(10)
: 5
-11
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.10.001
[1] 肖燕.追寻著作权保护与权利限制的平衡——图书馆界对《著作权法》修改草案的建议与期盼.中国图书馆学报[J],2013(1):18-24.
[2] 谢尔曼, 本特利.现代知识产权法的演进:英国的历程(1760-1911)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:33-34,39.
[3] 陈传夫.图书馆发展中的知识产权问题研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015:30,78,89,93,418-420.
[4] 黄国彬.我国图书馆规避著作权侵权风险的对策建议——基于图书馆可适用的著作权例外[J].图书馆杂志,2012(10):12-17.
[5] 王根.中外版权制度中图书馆合理使用条款比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2010(23):39-42,127.
[6] 梅术文.著作权法上的传播权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:109.
[7] 张慧霞.《信息网络传播权保护条例》有关图书馆的规定解读[J].电子知识产权,2007(1):36-39.
[8] 梁欣.解读《信息网络传播权保护条例》对图书馆的影响[J].情报资料工作,2007(6):69-72.
[9] 肖燕.网络环境下的著作权法与图书馆:理论与实践研究[D].北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,2001.
[10] 程焕文,黄梦琪.在"纸张崇拜"与"数字拥戴"之间——高校图书馆信息资源建设的困境与出路[J],图书馆论坛,2015(4):1-8.
[11] 向林芳.外文电子期刊数据库捆绑纸本订购模式分析[J],图书馆学研究,2012(3):52-57.
[12] 朱理.著作权的边界——信息社会著作权的限制与例外研究[D].北京:北京大学,2006.
[13] 秦珂.图书馆在与数据库出版商博弈中的自我拯救[J].图书馆论坛,2015(8):62-68.
[14] 周玲玲,杨萌,马晴晴,等.网络时代图书馆相关公共利益的维护研究——以我国《著作权法》及第三次修法为例[J].图书情报工作,2015(23):5-10.
[15] 北京市高级人民法院民事判决书(2013)高民终字第1221号[EB/OL].[2018-12-09].http://www.pkulaw.cn/case/pfnl_a25051f3312b07f322015936987fbd6e1ddb1ae18f72b649bdfb.html?keywords=%E7%8E%8B%E8%8E%98%E4%B8%8E%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E8%B0%B7%E7%BF%94%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E6%9C%89%E9%99%90%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E7%AD%89&match=Exact.
[16] 柯平.公共图书馆的文化功能:在社会公共文化体系中的作用[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2010:81.
[17] 林鸥.美国版权滥用原则的演进与反思[J].科技与法律,2010(3):80-84.
[18] 梁志文.数字著作权论——以《信息网络传播权保护条例》为中心[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007:381.
[19] 马卫平,刘净净.对"本馆馆舍内服务对象"的理解——商榷《信息网络传播权保护条例》第七条[J].图书馆理论与实践,2011(9):40-42.
[20] 黄国彬.可适用于我国图书馆的著作权例外立法框架研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(3):69-77.
[21] 万勇.《著作权法》图书馆例外条款修改建议[J].中国图书馆学报,2014(2):13-18.
[22] 姚鹤徽.数字网络时代著作权保护模式研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018:165.
[23] 考特, 尤伦.法和经济学[M].上海:格列出版社·上海三联书店·上海人民出版社,2012:80,91.
