[Purpose/significance] This paper explores how to apply the libcitation in the evaluation of scholarly books, to make suggestions for the evaluation of scholarly books.[Method/process] The paper discussed how libcitations be produced, be obtained and how to use libcitations in evaluation of scholarly books, taking WorldCat as an example to conduct an empirical analysis and discussion.[Result/conclusion] Libcitations can be got from library union catalogs. When obtaining the data, the appropriate retrieval method should be selected according to the selected source, so as to obtain the collection information of the works accurately. In the application of the libcitations, the features of the library should be considered to evaluate the influence of works more comprehensively and accurately.
Liu Xiaojuan
,
Ma Liang
,
Wei Yu
,
Zhao Zhuojing
. Research on Libcitation and the Evaluation of Scholarly Books[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(12)
: 29
-36
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.12.004
[1] GARFIELD E, EMERITUS C. Citation indexes for retrieval and research evaluation[EB/OL].[2018-10-15].http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/ciretreseval-capri.html.
[2] 何峻. 我国图书评价现状分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2012(3):106-110.
[3] SMITH R. Measuring the social impact of research[J]. BMJ, 2001, 323(7312):528.
[4] SARLI C C, DUBINSKY E K, HOLMES K L. Beyond citation analysis:a model for assessment of research impact[J]. Journal of the Medical Library Association Jmla, 2010, 98(1):17-23.
[5] WILBERTZ J. Evaluating societal relevance of research[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/14412466/Evaluatingsocietalrelevance.pdf.
[6] WHITE H D, BOELL S K, YU H, et al. Libcitations:a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2009, 60(6):1083-1096.
[7] HALEVI G, NICOLAS B, BAR-ILAN J. The complexity of measuring the impact of books[J]. Publishing research quarterly, 2016, 32(3):1-14.
[8] LINMANS A J M. Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(2):337-354.
[9] ZUCCALA A, GUNS R. Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings:Scholarly use versus ‘perceived cultural benefit’ (RIP)[C]//14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. Wien:Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG, 2013:353-360.
[10] ZUCCALA A. Correlating libcitations and citations in the humanities with worldcat and scopus data[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303286873_Correlating_libcitations_and_citations_in_the_humanities_with_WorldCat_and_Scopus_data.
[11] SHAW D. An analysis of the relationship between book reviews and fiction holdings in OCLC[J]. Library & information science research, 1991, 13(2):147-154.
[12] KOUSHA K, THELWALL M. Alternative metrics for book impact assessment:can choice reviews be a useful source?[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c69a/38d1ac5bafd750a3f54411452e8ac6d5f79d.pdf.
[13] 张玉,潘云涛,袁军鹏,等. 论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7):69-76.
[14] 余厚强,邱均平. 替代计量指标分层与聚合的理论研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2014, 33(10):13-19.
[15] WHITE H D, ZUCCALA A A. Libcitations, WorldCat, cultural Impact, and fame[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(12):1502-1512.
[16] American Library Association. Types of libraries[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/type.
[17] 鲜鹏. 论图书馆类型划分的本质属性——兼论党校图书馆应该向研究型专门图书馆发展[J]. 情报资料工作, 2002(6):48-50.
[18] 《中国图书海外馆藏影响力研究报告(2016版)》发布[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2016(5):10.
[19] A survey of collection development trends in academic libraries[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. https://www.ebsco.com/blog/article/collection-development-trends-in-academic-libraries.
