Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2019 , Vol. 63 >Issue 13: 5 - 15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.13.001

Reputation Association， Documentation Service Evolution and the Reform of Library Science Education

  • Tao Jun ,
  • Yang Jiulong
Expand
  • School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127

Received date: 2018-11-27

  Revised date: 2019-02-04

  Online published: 2019-07-05

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The pace of de-librarization has being accelerated at the global library and information circle in recent years. Revealing the above underlying mechanism is not only crucial to understand the crisis of library science education, but also significant to promote the reform of library science education.[Method/process] Based on the reputation theory of sociology, this paper constructs two models of college reputation association and a model of library reputation conduction. And then, it reveals the internal association mechanism between the change of library practice and information management disciplines as well as library science education.[Result/conclusion] The research finds that the lower reputation resulting from the continuous simplification of the library name and its core business will fundamentally restrict the attraction of library science education and the implementation of the connotation reform, and will further drag down the educational reputation of information management disciplines, thus damage the overall competitiveness. The study provides a new explanation for understanding the inefficiency of library science education, and provides an important reference for educational practitioners to evaluate the gains and losses of library science education objectively and further deepen the reform.

Key words： library science education; reputation association; de-librarization; document organization

Cite this article

Tao Jun , Yang Jiulong . Reputation Association， Documentation Service Evolution and the Reform of Library Science Education[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019 , 63(13) : 5 -15 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.13.001

References

[1] 霍国庆.信息管理与信息管理专业——记山西大学信息管理系[J].晋图学刊,1993(3):75.
[2] 谢阳群,邓以宁,吴昌合.关于设立信息管理专业的几个问题[J].情报科学,1994,15(2):34-39,59.
[3] 张晓林.关于信息管理学及其教育的思考[J].情报理论与实践,1995(2):37-42.
[4] 于良芝.图书馆学教育呼唤战略思维[J].图书与情报,2006(4):26-33.
[5] FINLAY C S,SUGIMOTO C R,LI D, et al. LIS Dissertation titles and abstracts (1930-2009):where have all the librar* gone?1[J].Library Quarterly Information Community Policy,2012, 82(1):29-46.
[6] 肖希明,李琪,刘巧园.iSchools"去图书馆化"的倾向值得警惕[J].图书情报知识,2017(1):19-25.
[7] 闫慧.中国大陆图书馆学教育中职业性缺失的环境分析[J].图书与情报,2006(4):44-48,84.
[8] 陶俊.体裁、社会效应与学术竞争力——图书情报学科高被引论文内容结构考察[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(1):56-65.
[9] VAN HOUSE N A,SUTTON S A. The panda syndrome:an ecology of LIS education[J]. Journal of education for library and information science 1996, 37(2):131-147.
[10] 陶俊.信息管理一级学科的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(9):5-12.
[11] 程焕文.高涨的事业与低落的教育——关于图书馆学教育逆向发展的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(1):67-70.
[12] 范并思.论图书馆学专业教育的改革[J].图书情报工作,1998(11):50-53.
[13] 初景利,杨沛超.国外三所大学图书馆与信息专业教育改革透视[J].大学图书馆学报,1996,14(5):47-50.
[14] ROY L,SIMONS R N. Tradition and transition:the journey of an iSchoolDeep in the heart of texas[J].Desidoc journal of library & information technology,2017, 37(1):3-8.
[15] GOLUB K,HANSSON J,SELDEN L. Cult of the "I":organizational symbolism and curricula in three Scandinavian iSchools with comparisons to three American[J].Journal of documentation,2017, 73(1):48-74.
[16] AI Y,FEATHER J. Education for information professionals in the UK.[J].International information & library review,2007, 39(3/4):260-268.
[17] WILSON C S,KENNANA M A,WILLARD P, et al. Fifty years of LIS education in Australia:academization of LIS educators in higher education institutions[J].Library & Information Science Research,2010, 32(4):246-257.
[18] BONNICI L J,SUBRAMANIAM M M,BURNETT K. Everything old is new again:the evolution of Library and Information Science Education from LIS to iField[J].Journal of education for library and information science,2009, 50(4):263-274.
[19] 张晓林.应该转变图书馆研究的方向[J].图书馆学通讯,1985,(3):57-65.
[20] 中华人民共和国.普通高等学校本科专业目录及简介:理工农林医药[M].北京:科学出版社,1989.
[21] 国家教育委员会高等教育司.普通高等学校本科专业目录和专业简介(1993年颁布)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1993.
[22] 中华人民共和国.普通高等学校本科专业目录和专业介绍(1998年颁布)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1998.
[23] 中华人民共和国教育部高等教育司.普通高等学校本科专业目录和专业介绍(2012)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
[24] 吴钢,张果果,肖艳琴,等.图书馆学本科教育的基础地位不应动摇——关于图书馆学本科教育存在问题的讨论[J].图书馆学研究,2006(4):5-10.
[25] 马费成.规范学科名称促进学科发展[J].图书情报工作,1996(3):8-10.
[26] 于鸣镝,初景利.试评图书馆学系更名[J].图书情报工作,1998(7):48-51.
[27] 李刚,倪波.20世纪中国图书馆学的现代性与学科建制[J].中国图书馆学报,2002(4):14-17.
[28] 于鸣镝.中国图书馆学的学科地位何以低下?[J].图书馆杂志,2003(11):16-18.
[29] 于良芝,梁思晨.iSchool的迷思:对iSchool运动有关LIS、iField及其关系的认知的反思[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(3):18-33.
[30] 邹永利.危机与选择——美国图书情报教育危机给我们的启示[J].图书情报工作,1993(5):46-49.
[31] 冯惠玲,周晓英.信息资源管理研究与教育:一个大有作为的领域[J].图书情报工作,2004(9):24-27.
[32] 唐明伟,苏新宁,肖连杰.面向大数据的情报分析框架[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):467-476.
[33] 陶俊,王传清.信息管理学科整合的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(14):40-48.
[34] 戴维.波普诺.社会学[M].李强,译.11版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[35] 古南辉.论专业认同感与图书馆学教育的关系[J].图书馆论坛,2010,30(1):161-163.
[36] 徐建华,王伟,俞碧飏.专业教育对未来职业者图书馆员刻板印象的影响分析[J].图书与情报,2013(2):53-57.
[37] 唐义,应鸣蕾,陈飞达.按照"图书情报与档案管理"一级学科培养本科生的需求现状——来自本科生的调查分析[J].图书馆论坛,2018(10):78-84.
[38] 苏新宁.提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010(4):47-53.
[39] 李强,刘海洋.变迁中的职业声望——2009年北京职业声望调查浅析[J].学术研究,2009(12):34-42.
[40] 李强.转型时期冲突性的职业声望评价[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):100-111,206.
[41] 王翩然,徐建华,李盛楠.我国图书馆员社会声望变迁研究[J].图书与情报,2018(2):74-81.
[42] 张晓林.与时俱进让学科之树常青[J].图书情报工作,2003(3):7-9.
[43] 叶继元,陈超美.坚守与拓展:中美图书馆学情报学教育科学定位的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2007,33(2):18-23.
[44] 张维迎.大学的逻辑[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:1-47.
[45] 戴维民.信息组织[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
[46] GARFIELD E. Citation indexes for science:a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas[J].Science,1955, 122:108-111.
[47] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J].Science,1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[48] GARFIELD E. Citation indexing-its theory and application in science, technology and humanities[M]. Philadelphia:ISI Press, 1983.
[49] SMALL H. Co-citation in the scientific literature:a new measure of the relationship between two documents[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1973, 24(4):265-269.
[50] 吴美美.关于网络时代知识组织的几个思考[J].图书资讯科学,2017,43(1):211-235.
[51] 沈迪飞.我所亲历的图书馆技术变革(1974-1998)[J].图书馆论坛,2016(9):52-61.
[52] 孟连生.中国科学引文数据库的建立及其应用前景[J].情报学报,1995,14(3):206-211.
[53] 张晓林.数字图书馆理论、方法与技术[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2007.
[54] 孙坦,刘细文.关于中国科学院文献情报系统业务组织模式创新的若干思考[J].图书情报工作,2003(2):110-112.
[55] 张智雄,宋文,孙坦,等.中国科学院文献情报系统数字图书馆资源组织体系研究[J].图书情报工作,2001(9):40-43.
[56] 祝忠明,马建霞,常宁,等.基于DSpace构建学科知识库系统的研究与实践[J].现代图书情报技术,2006(7):10-14.
[57] 初景利,孟连生.数字化参考咨询服务的发展与问题[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(2):14-17.
[58] 胡小菁.图书馆编目的衰落与转型[J].图家图书馆学刊,2015(6):12-15.
[59] 程焕文,姜瑞其.谈图书馆采编业务外包[J].图书情报工作,2006(1):6-9.
[60] ZAPOUNIDOU S,SFAKAKIS M,PAPATHEODOROU C. Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the semantic Web:a comparison of four conceptual models[J].Journal of information science,2017, 43(4):525-553.
[61] GODBY C J, DENENBERG R. Common ground:exploring compatibilities between the linked data models of the library of congress and OCLC[EB/OL].[2018-05-30].https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2015/oclcresearch-loc-linked-data-2015.pdf.
[62] BIBFRAME model, vocabulary, guidelines, examples, notes, analyses[EB/OL].[2018-05-30].http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html.
[63] BAEZA-YATES R,RBEIRO-NETO B. 现代信息检索[M].黄萱菁,张奇,邱锡鹏,译.北京:机械工业出版, 2012:1-15.
[64] 初景利,唐果媛.图书馆与智库[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(1):46-53.
[65] 里斯,特劳特.定位[M].王恩冕,译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002:21-34.
[66] 中国科学技术情报学会,中国社会科学情报学会.情报学与情报工作发展南京共识[J].图书情报知识,2017(6):126-127.
[67] 苏新宁.大数据时代情报学学科崛起之思考[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):451-459.
[68] 张晓林.数字图书馆机制的范式演变及其挑战[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(6):3-8,17.
[69] 张晓林.颠覆数字图书馆的大趋势[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(5):4-12.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.