[Purpose/significance] With the development of Web2.0, informal academic exchanges under social media have become a new field for scholarly academic exchanges. Therefore, analyzing interdisciplinary characteristics in the field of Library and Information Science can be used as a supplement and reference for the research of traditional academic exchanges.[Method/process] This paper takes ScienceNet.cn as the representative, and constructs discipline phylogenetic tree from three aspects, such as user friendship, review relationship and recommendation relationship. Then, the interdisciplinary characteristics of Library and Information Science are analyzed by using the diversity index of discipline phylogenetic tree.[Result/conclusion] Through this study, it was found that there is a strong correlation between the user's discipline phylogenetic tree and the friend's discipline phylogenetic tree, while the correlation between the review group and the recommend group is obvious. In addition, Computer Science, Management Science and Engineering, Macro Management and Policy are the most related disciplines of Library and Information Science.
Wu Xiaolan
,
Zhang Chengzhi
. Interdisciplinary Analysis of Library and Information Science Based on Social Media[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(13)
: 66
-74
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.13.007
[1] 孟祥保. 图书情报学交叉融合与发展——基于国外35种核心期刊的引文分析[J]. 图书情报知识,2012(5):50-58.
[2] 苏新宁. 提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2010,36(4):47-53.
[3] 李江. "跨学科性"的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014(3):87-93.
[4] ODELL J, GABBARD R. The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science 1996-2004:journal-to-journal citation analysis[J]. College & research libraries, 2008,69(6):546-564.
[5] MEYER T, SPENCER J. A citation analysis study of library science:who cites librarians?[J]. College & research libraries, 1996,57(1):23-33.
[6] CHANG Y W, HUANG M H. A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science:using three bibliometric methods[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,2012,63(1):22-33.
[7] CRONIN B, MEHO L I. The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2008,59(4):551-564.
[8] 邱均平, 瞿辉, 罗力. 基于期刊引证关系的学科知识扩散计量研究——以我国"图书馆、情报、档案学"为例[J]. 情报科学, 2012(4):481-485.
[9] 邱均平, 曹洁. 不同学科间知识扩散规律研究——以图书情报学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012,35(10):1-5.
[10] 杨建林, 孙明军. 利用引文索引数据挖掘学科交叉信息[J]. 情报学报, 2004,23(6):672-676.
[11] 张金柱. 利用参考文献的学科分类分析图书情报领域的学科交叉性[J]. 图书情报工作,2013,57(1):108-111.
[12] HURD J M. Models of scientific communications systems[J]. The transformation of scientific communication,1996(1):9-33.
[13] RAFOLS I. Knowledge integration and diffusion:measures and mapping of diversity and coherence[M]. New York:Springer, 2014:169-190.
[14] WAGNER C S, ROESSNER J D, BOBB K,et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR):a review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011,5(1):14-26.
[15] STIRLING A. On the economics and analysis of diversity[J]. Science policy research unit electronic working papers series,1998(1):1-156.
[16] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007,4(15):707-719.
[17] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社. 2011.
[18] HELMUS M R, BLAND T J, WILLIAMS C K,et al. Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity[J]. The American naturalist, 2007,169(3):E68-E83.
[19] BROMHAM L, DINNAGE R, XIA H. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016,534(7609):684-687.
