[Purpose/significance] The extensive development of scientific research cooperation will inevitably lead to the imbalance of regional scientific research output. In order to explore its distribution, the paper analyzed the causes of differences, and studied the spatial distribution of regional scientific research output.[Method/process] Based on the bibliographic data of the computer field from 1997-2016, the geographical location information of the organization is extracted, and the observation point was used to visualize the distribution, and the Gini index and the centrality index are measured to study the distribution concentration. By measuring the global Moran index and local autocorrelation index, the spatial autocorrelation law was studied. By measuring the Pearson correlation coefficient, the correlation between the number of colleges and universities, the gross national product, the research and experimental input, and the population was studied.[Result/conclusion] The output of journals in the computer field showed an uneven geographical distribution, a clear concentration, and spatial autocorrelation. Meanwhile, it had a high correlation with the number of regional universities and regional research and experimental funding.
Ma Chao
,
Li Gang
,
Mao Jin
,
Gu Yansong
. Research on the Spatial Distribution of Scientific Research Output: Taking the Computer Software and Application Field as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(15)
: 94
-102
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.15.011
[1] BORNMANN L, WALTMAN L. The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science-a visualization approach by using density maps[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(4):547-553.
[2] MATTHIESSEN C W, SCHWARZ A W. Scientific centres in Europe:an analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators[J]. Urban studies, 1999, 36(3):453-477.
[3] ZHOU P, THIJS B, GLÄNZEL W. Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3):839-857.
[4] MABE M. The growth and number of journals[J]. Serials, 2003, 16(2):191-197.
[5] 胡昌平,胡吉明.领域研究合作网络的地理可视化——以《中国图书馆学报》为案例数据[J].情报科学,2018,36(2):3-8.
[6] TOBLER W R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region[J]. Economic geography, 1970, 46(S1):234-240.
[7] DORMANN C F, MCPHERSON J M, ARAUJO M B, et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data:a review[J]. Ecography, 2007, 30(5):609-628.
[8] BOTTAZZI L, PERI G. Innovation and spillovers in regions:Evidence from European patent data[J]. European economic review, 2003, 47(4):687-710.
[9] FRENKEN K, HARDEMAN S, HOEKMAN J. Spatial scientometrics:towards a cumulative research program[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3(3):222-232.
[10] FELDMAN M P, AUDRETSCH D B. Innovation in cities:Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition[J]. European economic review, 1999, 43(2):409-429.
[11] 李惠芬. 城市创新力指标体系的建构及实证研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2010(7):15-20.
[12] 张协奎, 邬思怡. 基于"要素-结构-功能-环境"的城市创新力评价研究——以17个国家创新型试点城市为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(2):138-144.
[13] 曹勇, 曹轩祯, 罗楚珺, 等. 我国四大直辖城市创新能力及其影响因素的比较研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(6):162-170.
[14] 史欣向,冯莉,梁彤缨.中国现有的研发资源与科研产出的关系——基于第二次全国R&D资源清查数据的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(10):1-8.
[15] 杨军,伏琳,林艺文,等.浅析高等学校科研投入与产出[J].科技管理研究, 2013, 33(16):102-106.
[16] 吴杨,何光荣,何晋秋.高校科研投入与产出的相关性分析:1991-2008[J].清华大学教育研究, 2011, 32(4):104-112.
[17] 中国科学技术大学.中国科学技术大学官方网站[EB/OL].[2018-11-01]. https://www.ustc.edu.cn.
[18] AUDRETSCH D B, FELDMAN M P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. The American economic review, 1996, 86(3):630-640.
[19] WANG Y, HU R, LIU M. The geotemporal demographics of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 according to Ulrich's database[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(3):655-671.
[20] 胡祖光.基尼系数理论最佳值及其简易计算公式研究[J]. 经济研究, 2004, 9(1):60-69.
[21] ANSELIN L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA[J]. Geographical analysis, 1995, 27(2):93-115.
[22] 蔡翔,崔晓兰,熊静,等.我国地区R&D效率及其影响因素探究——基于"科研产出-成果转化"视角[J].软科学,2013,27(3):80-84.
[23] BOSCHMA R. Proximity and innovation:a critical assessment[J]. Regional studies, 2005, 39(1):61-74.
[24] 李佳哲,胡咏梅.国内高校科研效率和生产率研究述评及研究展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(01):54-61.
