[Purpose/significance] It is crucial to describe the subject structure of highly cited papers in archival science in order to understand the competitiveness of archival disciplines and the overall competitiveness of library, information& archival disciplines under the background of promoting the open competition of disciplines by "double first-class".[Method/process] On the basis of reviewing the competitiveness of archival disciplines, this paper analyzes the highly cited papers in CSSCI source journals of archival science between 2012-2015 from the three aspects of subject, evolution and citation structure. Then, the paper depicts structure of archival disciplines and evaluates the overall competitiveness.[Result/conclusion] The research finds that the highly cited topics of archival science are concentrated in the field of archival work and discipline construction; the topics of archival theory, archival information security and information technology application are among the top three, but the overall scale is insufficient relatively. The above results show that the overall development of archival discipline is unbalanced, and the competitiveness of archival science mainly comes from the research of archival work, while the scale of the research on the new technological topics that have more competitive archival theory exploration and influence the development of the discipline is insufficient. In order to enhance the competitiveness of archives disciplines and increase the overall competitiveness of library, information and archives disciplines in the future, the archival discipline should implement overall division of disciplines, optimize the structure of disciplines, reconstruct the competitive advantages of core areas, and upgrade the theoretical level of archives based on the integration and opening strategy of disciplines.
Tao Jun
,
Huang Xinrong
. Subject Structure of Highly Cited Papers and Discipline Competitiveness in Archives[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(16)
: 14
-21
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.16.002
[1] 闫慧. 青年学者论图情档一级学科核心知识及发展方向[J].中国图书馆学报,2019(1):121-127.
[2] 冯惠玲. 改革开放40年中国档案高等教育的历史性跨越[J].档案学通讯,2018(6):4-9.
[3] PRAHALAD C K,HAMEL G. The core competence of the corporation[J].Harvard business review,1990(5/6):2-15.
[4] 冯惠玲. 从文献管理到基于信息资源的管理——图书情报与档案管理学科的创新发展[J].情报资料工作,2013(3):6-10.
[5] CURRY S. Let's move beyond the rhetoric:it's time to change how we judge research[J].Nature,2018, 554(7691):147.
[6] ALBERTS B. Impact factor distortions[J]. Science,2013, 340(6134):787.
[7] 陶俊. 体裁、社会效应与学术竞争力——图书情报学科高被引论文内容结构考察[J].图书情报工作,2016, 60(1):56-65.
[8] 叶鹰. 国际学术评价指标研究现状及发展综述[J].情报学报,2014, 33(2):215-224.
[9] 胡鸿杰. 档案学经典著作研究发凡[J].档案学通讯,2017(5):14-19.
[10] 加小双,杨建梁,陈可彦. 信息科学研究中档案研究的边缘化问题及其突破——基于对iConference2017的分析与思考[J].档案学通讯,2018(1):18-23.
[11] 谭必勇,袁晓川. 档案学研究的国际进展(2001-2010)——基于九种国际档案学期刊论文的计量分析[J].档案学研究,2013(2):80-84.
[12] 董克,韩宇姝. 基于Topic Model的我国档案学主题结构与演化研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2017,7(3):97-105.
[13] 卢小宾,高欢. 基于Web of Science的档案学研究热点分析[J].档案学通讯,2015(3):35-38.
[14] 马海群,姜鑫. 我国档案学研究热点与前沿演进的知识图谱分析[J].档案学研究,2013(4):16-22.
[15] 杜雯,李刚. SSCI档案学核心来源期刊高被引文献分析(1930-2009)[J].档案管理,2011(5):58-61.
[16] 隋鑫,樊如霞. 近十年我国档案学高被引论文热点分析[J].兰台世界,2015(32):10-12.
[17] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J].Science,1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[18] BORNMANN L,DANIEL H D. What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior[J].Journal of documentation,2008, 64(1):45-80.
[19] HO Y S,KAHN M. A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the science citation index expanded[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2014, 65(2):372-385.
[20] DING Y,CRONIN B. Popular and/or prestigious? measures of scholarly esteem[J].Information processing and management,2011, 47(1):80-96.
[21] 周晓英,董伟,朱小梅等. 图书馆学情报学高影响力论文特征及所反映的学科差异分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012, 38(4):99-109.
[22] ZHABG L, ROUSSEAU R, SIVERTSEN G. cience deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping:revisiting seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation[J].PLoS ONE,2017,12(3):e0174205
[23] BORNMANN L,LEYDESDORFF L. Does quality and content matter for citedness? a comparison with para-textual factors and over time[J].Journal of informetrics,2015, 9:419-429.
[24] LEYDESDORFF L,BORMANN I,COMINS I A, et al. Citations:indicators of quality? the impact fallacy[J].Frontiers in research metrics and analysis,2016, 1(1):1-15.
[25] 冯惠玲,张斌,桑域毓, 等. 档案学专业高等教育发展情况调查报告[R]//中国档案学会. 创新:档案与文化强国建设——2014年档案事业发展研究报告集.北京:中国文史出版社, 2014:215-232.
[26] 王春燕. 以奋发有为的精神高效务实的作风发挥学会的功能[N]. 中国档案报,2017-04-03(1).
[27] 中国档案学会档案学基础理论委员会. 多学科视角下的档案学理论研究进展[R]//中国档案学会. 创新:档案与文化强国建设——2014年档案事业发展研究报告集.北京:中国文史出版社, 2014:1-61.
[28] 冯惠玲,周晓英. 信息资源管理研究与教育:一个大有作为的领域[J].图书情报工作,2004, 48(9):24-27.
[29] 陶俊,王传清. 信息管理学科整合的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2014, 58(14):40-48.
[30] 陶俊. 信息管理一级学科的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2013, 57(9):5-12.
